News Archives - Altitude Accelerator https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/category/news/ Sun, 24 Nov 2024 05:59:58 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/altitude-favicon-45x45-1.png News Archives - Altitude Accelerator https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/category/news/ 32 32 Steering Growth Stage Founders Towards Sustainable Businesses https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/steering-growth-stage-founders-towards-sustainable-businesses/ Mon, 29 Apr 2024 19:08:13 +0000 https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/?p=136451 Transcript Hessie Jones So today we are talking about how close stage founders can effectively steer towards building a sustainable business. And I’m so pleased to have David Peterson, who… Continue reading Steering Growth Stage Founders Towards Sustainable Businesses

The post Steering Growth Stage Founders Towards Sustainable Businesses appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>

Transcript 

Hessie Jones 

So today we are talking about how close stage founders can effectively steer towards building a sustainable business. And I’m so pleased to have David Peterson, who is known as the optimization coach with me today. And so David actually assists. The closed stage companies. IN2X saying their revenue growth to achieve their their 10X goal. So he helps companies become much more appealing to investors or if they choose, they choose their status as a successful founder owned business. So welcome to tech uncensored. Hi everyone. My name is Jesse Jones at this juncture. Early stage founders are generating revenue and they may at this stage also aim to actually raise a successful series round A, but they have to also focus on revenue quality. They are selling a vision of the future, and they’re emphasizing some of the key qualities that investors want to buy into. And so they have to construct this compelling narrative that justifies whether or not their idea is sound. So they not only need to understand the network effects as they grow, but the market receptivity and more importantly how the Founders and their teams actually respond. To each one of these things is going to be crucial. So when founders are growing their business, they’ll also run into challenges when it comes to scaling, they’ll start to incur costs to support the growth of their company, and so do you. Risking some of these challenges as they grow lays some, some solid groundwork for the future. Of the company. So. Here are some of the questions of startups must ask themselves, as they grow. Do they truly understand the effort required to make an idea profitable? So this is not necessarily just about revenue. This is this is about making sure that they have the cash flow to sustain the business. How motivated are they to get out of their own way and do what’s right for the business? What impact will their decisions have on the culture of the business as they grow? Or if they have to downsize at some point in the future and are the goals that they’ve articulated at the five and 10 year mark, are they? Achievable. So remember that early stage success isn’t just about revenue. It’s about building a strong foundation for sustainable growth. And David has experienced this in his own journey and nurturing a company to actually create some kind of enduring organization is his sweet spot and he offers some some. Great advice, so I welcome David to the show today. 

David Peterson 

Thanks, Hessie Jones. Thanks for having me. 

Hessie Jones

No problem so. Let let’s start with you and your background. You tell me about your startup journey, where it all began, and how you actually came to this point in being an advisor and coach. For startup companies.

David Peterson

All right, I think I did a lot of different things. Even when I ended my much younger years, I actually built a Pasta 3 program back in the early 90s and when I and this was back in Dubai and I went. To pitch it and people like. What do you mean, no passwords? That’s not secure passwords. Aren’t really secure and I’m like no, but at he time I  realized that it was all way ahead of my time was it was hilarious. I’m like you. You can’t hack this. There’s no password here. And there’s, like, no, you know, it was just. It was just bizarre. So. So that kind of went. You know, just I guess wrong time, wrong place. Right. So that’s one of the few things I learned that that early on. Then I went into it. I really liked, you know, computers and hardware was, you know, how do I say it was, was really evolving and there was new stuff happening. I got into building computers for people selling it to different individuals providing support. So I sort of expanded there as you know, as a young entrepreneur. Selling computers and and tech support. So that’s how it actually all started. Then later on I went because I was in the tech support space when I was in Canada, I went to independent tech shops. This was prior to, you know, the the the best buys and the future shops that existed that were sort of eating up most of those independent businesses that were providing tech support. So I would. Like build an app to help them get customers and go through that. But you know, not realizing where the the bigger markets we’re playing. So I think that’s something I learned during that journey is like, yes, that works, it’s helping them. But at the end of the day. Their bigger players that are impacting their ability to business and so therefore it’s not a sustainable growth model for myself. As a business. Then later on I actually developed, you know, back to the whole password thing, but an identity management system that could use for payments, a very secure way to prevent fraud in those various aspects. That is when I actually joined altitude back in the heyday. Early on, part of Mars as well, and went all the way up to tech stars for Seattle. And the the biggest challenge that I encountered there was basically where. I had to. Drop out. Was it needed? A six month commitment where I had to get out of, you know, just a kid at the time. Just starting a new family. And I had to pay not only for my own family, but the developers that were there to come with me. So that was. Not having the finances at that time was something where I learned like, OK, you, you really have to have a budget to keep the idea going and be able to grab certain opportunities that come your way if you need. That was one part and the other part that I learned from. That one was, I should have patented because that is what Apple Pay is today. So if I had built that, we’d be talking about a whole different story.

Hessie jones

Oh my goodness. Yeah, 2020 vision. Right after the fact. That’s amazing. So. You you’ve actually. So you’ve done this before, and so you understand the pitfalls of what you know, a lot of the startups today go through. So when you first talk. To a startup founder, what are the first things that you want to learn about them to determine whether or not you? Could help them.

David Peterson

Well, I I think going. Through all of that, and now, like for me being in business for in Canada for the last 18 years, I think that has given me lots of different views and aspects of including the North American culture. And then if you’re working internationally, how? That all works. To me, the first thing is where do they see themselves right? Like 5/10/15, even 20 years from now, aspects of you know, why are they in the business? Are they looking to sell it and make, you know, build it grow, because that’s exciting for a lot of people build a business, grow it, make. Money. Build another business and and and that’s the exciting aspect for for some founders. For other founders, it’s like OK, I want this to. I want to live a life I want. To travel the world, I want to see different things I. Want to be on a beach? I want to work for a couple of hours. And. Then get back into the business. But I don’t want to be chained to my business, so it’s more like is this an? An early retirement kind of vehicle business model that you’re trying to build, that’s one aspect of it. The other thing is, is it a legacy that some people want to build a legacy that they? Say OK, I want this to fund me all the way through. I want to give it to my children so that they have a source of revenue they can grow. They can take what they. Want with it and build it so that. Those are all the the key aspects that kind of decide to create a strategy of how to build a business. Because do you? Then need investors because if you’re selling it off, yes, you need to build it where investors are like, Oh yeah, this money in this I want to. In. Estimate and if you’re doing it for other reasons then do you need investor support or do you want to run it and you know own a business privately owned as a founder, right? And have that. As a success story.

Hessie Jones

It’d be interesting to see when, let’s say you decided to take on that founder. If you had asked him the same question, let’s say five years or even 2 years into your relationship. Whether or not his answer changes. Have you done that?

David Peterson

I I did, and actually it it it does what I’ve seen for most owners as they start building a more profitable build business they go from. I just wanted to make make money to. I want to get some investors and I may want to say is this. Oh, hold on. This is generating enough money that. Why do I need a? Why do I need an investor? So like there’s a shift saying I if this is sustainable and this is where it becomes very interesting where it’s sustainable, why do I need a founder to? OK let me see how how much I can grow it and then OK, I do want to sit on the beach like some of them. Like. Yeah, I I do want to sit on the beach. I don’t want to own it, but I want to be like the chairperson of the organization. I just want to be a shareholder and getting the returns this and coming and seeing what the business is doing and therefore as long as it’s going. The right way I can hand it off to my family if they want. It or you know? Like you know, if I want to sell it it it just it opens doors and opportunities are different ways of doing business or even the aspect of I may want to start another business using the funds from this business, right? So there’s a lot of opportunities in terms of ideas that you know. I I see it as a founder. You. You never really stop with one great idea, right. There’s always other ideas that. Just keep flowing.

Hessie Jones

Absolutely. OK. So you have a mantra and you say everything is a project. And so as as companies grow like what, what does this mean in terms of how a company actually manages all their stuff?

David Peterson

Yeah. I mean, to me, everything I say everything. Is a project because the reality is everything is a project is there’s. There’s two main things that I look at. The first one being. There’s a time bound activity for something to happen. It’s going to stay here. It needs to finish by here and there’s always a budget as much as people say, OK, I don’t. If the one you don’t know how much I wanna spend on it, you gotta figure how much you really want to spend on it and. What’s your reserves cause cause cost really. Dictate what you can can. And why project? Why is we want to take that project? Approach is primarily because we need a plan. We need to know, OK, what do we need to do to get to where we need to get to? What’s the cost for it? What’s the real timeline for this? Would that work with all the other aspects that’s happening within the business? And you know, all the all the other projects that have been kicked off, maybe it’s marketing maybe to sales. Maybe it’s hiring people, right? Maybe it’s a new development, maybe it’s. The upgrade of the platform. From one version to another version. It’s a feature upgrade. Everything has a cost. Everything takes time. And projects the the primary purpose of projects working with people. A lot of everything, almost everything that needs to be developed to create it requires a person to interact with it. And that’s the key part, whether it’s your customer or you know, even building traction, right.

Hessie Jones

So it’s not only in in product development you’re saying to use some of those the the key approaches and actually let’s saying set up your accounting system for. Sample right?

David Peterson

100% exactly because like it’s like, OK, what accounting system do I want? What’s the benefits of this? Like it is a project where if you go to somebody and say, hey, I want this, they’ll go through that process. Here’s the evaluations. Here’s the here the different products you go through a discovery phase, then you go through OK, let me plan out. OK, once I select the tool, what’s my implementation phase? Who do I need to? Integrate other integrations that I need. Is it with, with the banking system? With the accounting. With my existing maybe maybe you have a SAS based app for example, is it going to integrate with that? How do I streamline and I wanna say like optimize that process so that if you start it off early enough, what ends up happening is you don’t end up being resource. Every and that’s where most organizations kind of, because the most expensive. Cost is people and you want to get the right people to make sure that you know you’ve got the systems doing the heavy lifting and the the people are providing you with that knowledge. That insight, that ability to make it even better because you know that’s why we have machines.

Hessie Jones

Is it? It’s interesting that you’re talking about this kind of approach because everybody talks about how founders in in the beginning have to be nimble. And hey, if I’m if I decide that I’m going to use that specific application, I I’m just going to buy it today. But but what you’re saying is that if you don’t do your homework, then you may realize that down the road there could be a potential integration, you know, obstacle that you run into with that specific app, that, that, that may not necessarily be, I don’t know, adaptable or configurable to your existing organizations. So doing your homework saves a lot of time and money later on.

David Peterson

100% because whether It’s the founder that’s doing a lot of like if a founder is, let’s say, a founder, you’re being nimble, you’re just starting out, right. And if you’re saying, OK, I want to put this accounting out, you could spend, you know, upwards of 10/15/20 years. Doing your research. Putting it in, setting it up and and what have you, and then only to and then as you start. Investing more time by putting more data into it. And as you’re growing and not realizing where your company needs. To be or. What where your five-year plan is this might have been a very quick fix, but once it grows up to two years, then you try to work with another, you need to you’ve outgrown it. What happens then? Now you gotta spend money to move it from 1 system to another system and then you you you create other problems that you’re now you’re solving problems. That you you know, if you it’s, you know, retrospect like, oh, I should have chosen that one. It would have was it was $5 more or maybe I should have held off right. Like those kind of things people retrospect would go back and then they feel like because you didn’t take a project approached. It because you didn’t evaluate the full site.

Hessie jones

And I guess sometimes there are aspects that that you can’t anticipate. But as long as you, I’d say not invest to the point that it’s almost more expensive to make the change over later on. I think that’s that’s key.

David Peterson

100% things need to you have to look at products and services and the organizations and vendors and partners that can support your growth. Right, because you want to grow into them if they’re going to tap out at that point, then you’re looking at shifting. There’s a cost to shift, right? And it disrupts business. But also sometimes it might be a great a great problem to have, like, oh, we’ve overgrown past what we expected. Like if that’s what you’re having that you were supposed to be here five years, but you got there. In year one or year 2 1/2. That’s a fantastic problem to have, right? Because you were expecting to be there and you’re here sooner. That’s not really a problem. That’s you’ve you’ve got, you’ve achieved something really great cause five years from now you were supposed to make that. Right. So to me those aren’t problems. Those are actually great opportunities to. To grow further.

Hessie Jones

OK, so let’s talk about like one of the questions that I I put up in the abstract as I as I talked. About this was do founders truly understand the effort to make an idea profitable? Because as you know, when you when you start to grow it, you know revenues came right and revenue to show the investors that you have an idea that’s that’s actually worth investing in. But at some point in time, profit becomes more king than revenue. Can you explain when that happens and what the founder when a founder needs to to understand that specific signal?

David Peterson

Sounds you know, that’s a that’s in some ways a touchy topic because it brings about the Excel sheet like I’ve been found. I’ve been there. I, you know, you create, you come up with a brilliant idea. You’re already sold into it, right. You you believe it’s going to make you know. Hundreds of millions of dollars. And then you create, you go to excel and you stop putting all the numbers and you’re like, wow, I could get this and this. And then it’s like you’ve you’ve created this evidence now numbers to justify how this is like. 100% profitable. It’s going to make a lot of money. What ends up happening is that the reality is between making the first sale the 2nd, the 3rd, and you know, basically doubling your your user base from one to two, two to four, four to you know, 4 to 8, eight to 16 and so forth. That’s your traction model and traction is basically the key. What everybody looks for, right. And as as a founder. The traction and the rate of traction on the pace of how your. Growth is will tell you. How how much of A growth you can sustain? Because if it’s a very long. Period to you know. Double let’s say you know you’ve gone from 1 customer. It takes you another two months to get the second customer. There’s cost that you’re having to once both the customer and to just BU business as usual. Keep the lights on in your in your company. Those costs need to be factored in and that’s where you have to develop. Different strategies to say. Here’s my cost of running my business. Here’s the cost of, you know, acquisition for for a client. Here’s the cost to support the client which I have. How fast do I need to really grow to make that model successful? Because if you, if you can’t sustain the business, you’re going to be putting a lot of money to keep it alive, but eventually if. That gap is. Too wide. That’s when you know startups. You know, why do startups fail? Is they just don’t have enough money to take them across the journey to cross the the the chasms, so to speak, and get to the other. Right. And that’s why sometimes if you if you do a project plan and This is why I always go by the factor part, the project panel tell you do you have the money to get to you across this site, it’s like saying you know I want to drive from one end of the country to the other gas stations. Do you have the money for gas? Sometimes people like you know I’ve got the first tank of. Gas. I’m going to go and then it’s like, OK, now you’re stuck. You know, and you’re missing opportunities because time is opportunity, right? So. That’s kind of my approach to that.

Hessie Jones

Now if you take that scenario and and compare assess business to let’s say a hardware. Business it’s it’s very different. Obviously SAS is is much much easier to to plan for in some cases, right. But you could you could explain why you don’t agree with that but but for hardware it’s much harder because because it’s a physical product it it takes time to develop. And so trying to forecast demand and and trying to and and also taking consideration how long it takes to build that thing and your reliance on let’s say the manufacturer to be able to get it to you within a specific amount of time, that’s hard.

David Peterson

Yes. So to me is the risk, right? So I I view it as both need development and if you’re building a fast based product, you’re you’re you’re building it, the risk for the SAS is you’re and same for the hardware. You always have this upfront part, but you you’re sort of testing the market and it’s it’s more cost effective as a SaaS business versus a hardware. Business, but in the hardware business, what you’re running is the risk of what are my, you know, like I I’m I’m building. What else is somebody else building that we don’t know about? Right. So you’ve got that you’ve got manufacturing, you got market opportunity, you have a window that tends to kind of shrink really fast as things move at a different pace. What are the other technology disruptors that you couldn’t factor in or are aware of? So all of those things need to be. You know, if you take the project plan approach again, it’s like there’s a whole risk strategy. You you do risk mitigation, how do I mitigate with these risk? Because do I need to order equipment? Do I just choose to have a smaller inventory? Those things help the founder realize, OK, I’m going to take this approach. I’m going to take that approach that will solve that problem that will solve that problem, because at the end of the day, all these risks are problems that a business has to have and that the problem that it creates is the financial problem. Most startups are self funded. They do get some investors and those investors normally have family and friends. I don’t really call them investors. Those are people that believe in the person more than the product that they’re building. Investors look at what’s the product is, their ability to market it and is the founder. You know, confident enough that they can sell it because then they buying the person at the end of the day, right? They’re investing in the person, but they’re. Also investing in. A product that has the ability.

Hessie Jones

To make money. OK, so you coach companies, both the founder and their teams. So as they grow. You know, the founder himself has to balance for growth. But also he’s starting to wear a couple of hats because now his team has is going from, let’s say, two people to now like 5 and then 10. So what, what do what do Council, the founder at this stage, especially when it comes to starting? To develop a culture that he wants people to look in.

David Peterson

You know, and almost it is tough, right? It’s tough for founders because most most founders didn’t get the opportunity to run their own business, right. They haven’t run a business. They didn’t fail. They didn’t get the opportunity to fail. They’ve got a brilliant idea that they’re working with, that they don’t want to fail, right. So they’re under by default under a lot of pressure. Some of them never even have the opportunities to manage large teams or people, motivate them, hire people. Right. They just that wasn’t something that they’ve ever had the opportunity to do. Now they’re and now they’re put into a position where they’re the become the CEO of a company they probably never worse. They had a CEO had before in their life, and now they’re the CEO. And now they’re dealing with marketing sales. HR, the lawyers, contracts vendors, procurement, right, all sorts of different things that it is just you know it, you know, you talk about drinking from a fire hose like they’re just being bombarded by somebody holding the fire hose because now you know it’s the company. And the shift is before it was a person and an idea. Now it’s the company that owns the idea, right? So once the company owns the idea. The CEO’s job. Is to lead the company and it’s no longer. It’s no longer. Yeah, the CEO. It’s no longer my idea. It’s the companies. I I sold at the. Moment I incorporated it. Right. The company owns that idea. They own that IP. Now. I did a trade. I’m running that company to become more successful. To sell that idea. That IP that, that company owned and is, you know, has bought from me and make that successful. So that transition. That letting go of that, you know, let’s call it, you know, your baby or the idea that you had and letting the company run it and and running a company with the CEO mindset.

Hessie Jones

You you actually touched on like my next point about about what this this CEO mindset looks like because as you say they haven’t done this before. So what that what is the critical realization that? That they come to or when do they come to it? Where they realize that this is not a hobby anymore, that this is this is something that could actually sustain and make money, and at what point do I have to just get out of my own way? For the for the benefit of the company.

David Peterson

Absolutely. And that comes down to what was their first intention, right? If their intention was, I want to do this cause it just brings. Me. Personal pleasure. It’s a hobby. I love it if I’m making some money out of it, great it it goes into my little Kitty and I, you know, I have some more money to invest in my hobby and then you’re developing that into a company. It’s a very different mindset. It’s a different growth pattern. It’s a different shift from what a person has to. There’s a lot of passion in it involved in it. It isn’t about making money, it’s about providing service to somebody that can benefit from their own passion, which they’re enjoying by themselves. When someone comes in as a founder as well hear something that I want to build. I want to. Create, but the purpose of it is to. Make money. The the purpose of any business is to make money. If it’s not making money, then that’s a hobby, and that’s that’s the biggest difference differentiated that I want to make out is if it, if it’s not making money. It’s a hobby that you’re investing in. Yeah, it might. You know, it it it’s. It’s nice to do and nice to have, but the the intention is important and a lot of people may have the intention of making. Money, but not a lot of ideas, may not, right? It could be like you know me person as well. It could be just, you know, market opportunity timing might be off, it might be a brilliant idea that just you wait a year, you need to build it and wait, wait for it or it just might be that there’s just not enough consumers there to help you grow and sustain the business cause it needs you know you need a lot of money to grow. The business to get to 1 point and then if you look at the Bell curve or however you want to look at it, but there is a sustainment aspect of it and is there enough customers that can keep engaging it or stay on long enough for you to sustain that business for you to look at? Having your next idea or you know selling it or moving it and doing whatever you want to. Do with it.

Hessie Jones

So at what point does does a founder or do you see in in instances where the founder just throws up his hands and he said that’s it? I can’t. I can’t do it anymore because obviously the journey is hard and they may not necessarily. That that they’re funding and they’re bootstrapping to the point where they say, OK, I can’t throw any more money at this like how when does that typically happen and how do you how do you counsel them on it?

David Peterson

Well, that normally happens towards the end and we’re just we’re just normally the sad part because they’ve they’ve sort of burned a lot and and they’re coming for help at the point where it’s very difficult to provide help unless this financial funds to support the, you know the fix right, because it it caught everything costs money. And that’s why if you look at the project. That aspect of. It there’s time, so it’s going to take. Time to fix. It but it also. It’s going to require money to to fix it. What I you know, I always tell people and that’s what they learn. You know, sometimes through the hard way, you know, even myself. You learn by getting people on early enough, getting the right counsel, understanding the difference between first between a coach and an advisor because the advisor is going to tell you based on their experiences or known knowledge of other people that have gone through it. The coach kind of works with the individual’s strengths, right? So it’s like, what do you have as your strength? How do I work with what you’ve got so that you can then take it and and and grow your company, right. That’s that’s the slight. That means always getting people on early enough, because the earlier you get it, you prevent yourself from getting in that situation. Sometimes you can work with people to say, OK, fine. Yeah, OK. You don’t know. What to do? Let’s create a plan. Let’s see what other options are out there. Maybe some other types of investors. Maybe it’s repackaging it. Maybe it’s bringing it down slower to something that’s, you know, more manageable. More cost effective in terms of what you can, what you can sustain to keep it alive, to to end up with the dream or the idea that you initially had, you know you had and. The journey might be different. But. If at the end goal is still achievable, then I think that’s that’s part of the process. That’s right.

Hessie Jones

They’re almost giving founders the tools in a way to. To stop them from making the wrong decisions. And I think I think from what I hear you say is that if if I’m going to do this right, then I can’t have this knee jerk effect or in in making some of these decisions. Because for example, like hiring right you can hire. They’re your best friend. You can. Your mom says. You know what? Can you give your brother a job? Get get them started in your company. A lot of those, a lot of those decisions earlier on don’t have a huge impact, but may may have a bigger impact later on in the company. So you’re you’re trying to get them started. Early to to be more, I would say mature about how they make decisions. Is that fair?

David Peterson

Yeah, it’s it’s understanding. The consequences of decisions, like every decision you make, has a consequence. What are those consequences? Are those consequences that are good consequences all those consequences that, oh crap, I don’t really want to have. Those because sometimes you don’t think about it right, like. Everybody. Everybody starts off with good intentions. No one really stops off like in hiring family. Whatever it is like, it’s a good intention of the the there’s a person that wants to get in or if I’m giving them some, you know, a percentage of the equity. All that stuff works out because it’s like, OK, I’m, I’m bringing something, but then you go to an investor and the investors like, OK. Want to buy X? These people own that much amount of equity. What are they doing? What are they contributing with? That person can’t get me to where it’s like. Well, I I’m only getting this portion in and you want X millions of dollars or hundreds of thousands of dollars, but no one’s put in the same dollar value or, you know, even sweat. Equity wise, they don’t have that. It creates problems in in. In the final, you know financial model because at the end of the day, if you look at any business and I and I, you know, I say if anyone’s invested in the stock or an equity fund or whatever it is, you’re only going to invest in a company that’s making money. No one’s going to invest in a company that’s not making money. No one would say, hey, that company is struggling, might reach bankruptcy. Let me buy a lot of their. Stock, right, you’re. Not going to do. That right, so. It’s the same thing like you’re as a company. Are you building a company that people are going to say, hey, you’re making money, I’m going to invest in you. And this is how I’m, you know, and this is where you’ve. Structured it well enough that you can. Allow investment to come in if you need it. Maybe it’s private funding. Maybe you know. Like there’s so many. Options. There’s options for everything. It all comes down to what do you want your company to be. You know, 5-10 years. Is it something for your retirement? Something is a legacy. Something that you want to sell. Those things always anchored. The decisions that you’re making cause the goal for. You know the the founders. I wanted that because I I want to sell on the beach. I wanted that because I want to get money and retire early. I want that because I want to sell it off. You know, after about 1010 years, if I reach or if I reach this dollar value, that’s when I want. To exit, those are goals that you build. Within the company as part of. The strategy for the founder. Because that’s really how you play the game. Because you’re playing a different game, right? And that’s the most important thing is, which game are you playing? Right. Because sometimes people say, OK, I’m going to stop the journey. Me and I’ll figure out what I’m going to do, but it’s like you. You’ve changed the game that you’ve played every time you’ve changed the strategy, your customer base, the approaches, everything changes, right? Everything is anchored to which game you’re playing.

Hessie Jones

OK, so I don’t know if you have an example of a company that you’ve done business with for a while and you’ve you’ve counseled them and they they’re they’re they actually take your advice. And they’re ready to fly on their own. Like, how would you? How would you define or determine what characteristics they actually have that acknowledge whether or not in themselves or within their business that they don’t need you anymore?

David Peterson

When I so to me, when they need to talk less and less right when they have less problems too, that they need to resolve. When they’ve got the support system within the organization and the people that can solve the problems that they need, right? So it’s no longer ohh we need to solve for these problems. I’ve got the team, I’ve got the people that can do it, OK. I’ve got an HR. Issue I’ve I’ve got the right person in HR. They can handle that. I’m not. I don’t need to do that. I I need to increase revenue. I’ve got the right sales. Person heading sales on the sales team. They’ll increase the revenue and if they need support from marketing, I got. Marketing, business development lawyers. OK, I already have lawyers. I know it and and the people within the company know who to talk to to get that done. I know I don’t need to be involved in it. I can, you know, as the CEO, I can lead without being involved in the day-to-day businesses of the organization. And there’s people that. Look at the day. To day and I’m there to keep them to their North star and say, OK, this is still where we’re going. How are we going towards that? And you’re tracking their ability and keeping everybody In Sync towards achieving that, that not sound goal. So that’s when they really then it’s a different kind of aspect of. It’s people management kind of coaching versus, you know, business, business coaching.

Hessie Jones

Are there companies that you have that that you’re particularly proud of in in helping them achieve what they’ve set out to achieve?

David Peterson

I am. There are a few that have been, you know that I’m very happy with what they’ve managed to achieve in such a short period of time, and they’ve helped me even refine my model. Right does it. It is I. I do have a specific business model that I use for. Companies and working with the different players that helps me up, you know I say optimization but it helps me keep refining continuous improvement and optimize that model even further for other startups. I want to come up on. To the same thing and so. Every it’s a win win for everybody. Everyone’s benefiting through that whole process and it’s. It’s it’s great.

Hessie Jones

You were to have just like like one. One piece of advice for founders in the growth stage and how they could help. I don’t know. Achieve this mindset that you that you speak of. What should they? be open to or what should they be? What should they look for?

David Peterson

Do you have a plan? And what does that plan look like? Is it written down because that’s the first thing? If you don’t have that, you don’t have that written down. You’re kind of I want to say you’re winning it and then you have no way to measure your success and you have no way to figure out when you need to pivot or what do you need to go to do to get back on track. Right? So it just comes down. Do you have a plan? And if you have a plan, you’ll have a budget and you’ll know you know how that’s all going to work out. I think if they have that there. They’re 80% successful and then it’s 20% of the effort because that’s really all it is. A lot of. The work is really a mind exercise that needs to be done, and once you do that, 80% of the mind exercise, then the 20% is the effort that they just need to be successful where it says putting 80% of the effort and then. Saying, oh crap, I need to.

Hessie Jones

It’s it’s amazing. Everything that you talked about, it’s like, oh, my God, I I remember doing all that and also feeling the pain of having to go to, to make some of those tough decisions. Right. So I thank you. Thank you for spending the time with me today, David.

David Peterson

OH thanks for having me. It was a lovely conversation.

Hessie Jones

It was. And so that’s all we have time for today. And if our audience, if any of you have topics that you want us to cover, please don’t hesitate to e-mail us at communications and altitude accelerator.ca.

Tech Uncensored is powered by altitude accelerator and is produced by Bluemex and Transistor radio. My name is Hesse Jones and until next time have fun and stay safe.

Host Information

Hessie Jones is an Author, Strategist, Investor and Data Privacy Practitioner, advocating for human-centred AI, education and the ethical distribution of AI in this era of transformation.

She currently serves as the Innovations Manager at Altitude Accelerator. She provides the necessary support for Altitude Accelerator’s programs including Incubator and Investor Readiness. She will be the liaison among key stakeholders to provide operational support and ultimately drive founder success.

LinkedIn

You can also listen to this podcast on Spotify.

Please subscribe to our weekly LinkedIn Live newsletters.

The post Steering Growth Stage Founders Towards Sustainable Businesses appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>
Make or Break – Establishing Product Market Fit is Crucial to Success https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/make-or-break-establishing-product-market-fit-is-crucial-to-success/ Mon, 15 Apr 2024 22:25:37 +0000 https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/?p=134313 Transcript Hessie Jones So product market fit is a make or break factor for startups. Even the best products can fail without market demand, while an average product can actually… Continue reading Make or Break – Establishing Product Market Fit is Crucial to Success

The post Make or Break – Establishing Product Market Fit is Crucial to Success appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>

Transcript

Hessie Jones

So product market fit is a make or break factor for startups. Even the best products can fail without market demand, while an average product can actually succeed if there is demand that exists. So what does it look like? Once companies reach this critical milestone. The product resonates with the market and that means that customers buy actively. They use the product they recommend the product to others in sufficient numbers. So there’s enough to sustain growth and profitability when there is product market fit. So welcome to tech consensus. My name is Hessie Jones. Investors often demand. Evidence of this product market that before they’re investing in a company. So it demonstrates that your product has real demand and a viable market, especially at the early stages of growth. So here’s some examples of notable companies that have pivoted and achieved this product market fit. So Apple is a big one. If everybody remembers, they initially focused on personal computers, but then they had this game changing pivot to the iPhone, which combined. And and a phone, a music player, Internet access. And they revolutionized the mobile phone industry. So Uber is another one. They actually started as a luxury black car service. But they realized the real opportunity actually resided in ride sharing. It was more accessible. It was more convenient, and it disrupted the traditional taxi industry. I don’t know if people remember Airbnb, what they actually went into the market for, but they aim to provide mattresses. For travelers during COVID. That they soon focused on vacation rentals, and they connected travelers with unique accommodations, and they tapped into a market need that disrupted the hotel industry forever. So the final one is slack. They were initially a gaming company, and they pivoted. To create a team collaborations platform and this platform, from what I read was that was something that they actually built for themselves to improve collaboration, to sync conversations among their team and to improve productivity overall. So all these companies had a couple of things in common. When they recognize market shifts, they adapted to change and they stayed tuned to many of the market needs they demonstrated. There is this flexible flexibility they demonstrated, sorry, their flexibility and strategic adjustments that were essential to actually achieving. Product market fit. So having said all that, I’d like to welcome Abhishek Mathur to the. Page he is the VP of Product Management at Pipe at which is a secure data collaboration solutions provider. He’s also one of our advisors at altitude Accelerator and he is seasoned in digital media, ICT financial services. He has experience in B2BB2C strategies. He knows he has done product development, has also done business development and he knows how to scale businesses to drive sustainable growth. That means that you’re going. To be awesome on this conversation.

Abhishek Mathur

Thanks a lot for having me here. Excited to have this conversation on honestly. One of my favorite topics of product management.

Hessie Jones

OK, awesome. So this is going to be really good. OK, so let’s start with you telling us a little bit about yourself and your entrepreneurial experience and specifically from these experiences, what were the challenges and or I’d say processes that got your companies? Or your the companies that you managed to product market fit.

Abhishek Mathur

Yeah, absolutely. So over the course of the most of the last 10 years, I’ve worked at a very small stage. Companies all venture backed startups and effectively been the product manager, lead product manager for each one of them. The startups have been anywhere from seed. Stage two series Z. So I’ve seen something very, very small as in like 7 people companies, and I’ve also seen companies as large as 300 people, essay series E and of course I’ve done some enterprise work as well, but starts like what? We’ll keep the focus for today. On and I’ve also built a couple of strips as well. Personally, I just enjoy the whole company building process, so I’ve ventured on that side as. Well, so when we talk about actually product market fit, I think it’s a a term that a lot of startups, a lot of founders. Think deeply about, but it’s one also those topics that is not as well defined. It ends up being quite nebulous in terms of what does that actually mean? How do you actually know you have achieved it? And frankly, the way to really kind of simplify the definition for founders and startups is to really build a product for the right user or company segment that really, really has like a core problem that your product can solve for in a good way or a good enough way for your target customers. To say yes, it’s solve a problem and I I wanna use it. I wanna buy it. I wanna keep coming back. Right. So that’s like in a very, very simplistic terms like talking about product market fit, what does that mean for your business? What does that mean for your customers? Customers have a problem they’re looking to solve that problem as long as your product can solve that in a good way and you can distribute that that product over to your target customers well. Then that effectively helps you say whether you’ve. Got product market fit or?

Hessie Jones

Not OK so. That that’s like. Ways into to the next question, which is you’re basically saying your customer is core to everything that you do. It helps. Do you risk a lot of the things that you end up doing or spending within your company like hiring new people in sales and marketing? It’s going to determine? Many of your cultural decisions, so it’s crucial when you you you start to really understand to your customers. So what’s steps do you take to to really understand your customer?

Abhishek Mathur

Yeah, absolutely. So effectively starts it can be in a pre product market fit stage and a post post product market fit stage. And in the pre product market fit stage, founders need to work actually quite hard. Just speaking with their customers and prospects on a regular basis to form some level of hypothesis. We’ll dive into this a little bit more as well. But effective we’re talking about like sales hiring market like all of that needs to happen, but it’s it’s good to kind of. Focus on those fronts. Once you’ve kind of figured out or have a good signal for product market fit. So once again let’s dive into pre product market fit and what can you actually do for. So customer discovery is like the core of it and customers are the center of you trying to figure out your product market. Fit journey. So how do you actually go about doing that? First thing is to really kind of identify your target customer segment. So if you’re a B2B customer or sorry a B2B company, then you want to identify within what vertical. Or within what function are you solving that? For for example, you look at any of the enterprise companies these days, a bunch of AI stores that are popping up, they know that they need to target data scientists at, say, enterprise companies, 10,000 people or larger companies, or if it’s like a mid market, then it’s like 5 to 10,000. So we’re kind of defining what is that company persona look like. That is going to have or experience that problem that your company is looking to solve. The startup is looking to solve for. And then within that company, who is that actual person who is going to experience that problem the most? Or call them the users they’re going to use your product into solving for their problem and then basically speak with them over and over and over across many, many different organizations to try to validate some of the core. Hypothesis that you have on the problem that you’re looking to sow. So if you say solve a problem in the HR space, you want to speak to as many HR managers as you can in different companies and validate that hey, if payroll is a problem that you’re going to. Solve within HR. Talk about payroll and make sure that that problem that you’re going to solve for using your product that actually exists. Once you can validate that the problem actually exists and this is like the whole point of customer discovery. That allows you to kind of move forward and figure out, hey, the problem actually exists. Then I can figure out how do I build my. Product around that.

Hessie Jones

Is there a point where when you validate the problem exists like how many? How much of the research do you need to do? I guess across how many different companies to actually say, OK, this is an overriding problem, we’re going to go after that.

Abhishek Mathur

Yeah, it’s it’s a really good question and unfortunately no simple answer towards this. If you are starting off and you are. Getting signal very quickly from people that you’re speaking with, then the discovery process could be relatively short, but from what I’ve seen it’s very in the B2B world. It’s very valuable to speak to at least 50 to 100 companies or 50 to 100 people to try to get that level of volume. If you’re saying speaking with only 5-10 people. Then there could be biases that are introduced. There could be, like overlooking. Like might you might not catch. It’s just like when you are getting to that 50 to 100 number of people that you’re speaking with, that’s when you start to get that critical mass and inform more of like a stronger signal on the problem that you’re actually solving for. And it’s so much better to actually validate this at an earlier stage before you’ve actually gone ahead. And I built out a full on product. I know we’re gonna talk about that a little bit later on as well, but doing this at the early stage at the beginning is so important because what you don’t want to do is build something for a market that doesn’t exist or for a problem that doesn’t exist.

Hessie Jones

OK, so now you’ve gotten to the point where you’ve identified this is the problem that we’re going to try to solve against this ideal customer profile. So what does that look like that I that ICP?

Abhishek Mathur

Yeah, that’s ICP is honestly one of the most important things to kind of define. And it’s not necessarily needed for founders to have that concrete like at the beginning, and make sure that kind of sticks throughout. There are basically at the beginning you are driving it or writing a hypothesis on this. You can have a hypothesis of in a. Small bank, which has less than 5000 employees with some level of assets under management. I’m going to speak with the. Tech team over there. Because they probably experience problems AB and C. Right. So you can have that as like an initial level of hypothesis you go and try to validate some of the problems around that and it could very well be true that, hey, it’s actually not a small bank. It’s actually thin text that you want to work with. So it’s completely fine to kind of modify that hypothesis that you have around the ICP. So the way you can, like modify the OR. Sorry, segment ICP or ideal customer profile, it can be around. The company size it could be around the person who’s actually working at the company and their function. It could be around how frequently they experience a particular problem, their day-to-day behavior, who they who they interact with. Geolocation regulations are subject to. There’s so many ways to kind of define that actual criteria, which is actually. Quite fun as a founder to work on on your side, to define that that ends up becoming your hypothesis. Then you go ahead and speak with folks so you can validate the hypothesis or invalidate the hypothesis, which is equally as valuable because you’re trying to figure out you’re getting to. The ground truth. And no matter if it validates or invalidates that both answers are great. You just trying to figure out what you have in mind. Is that going to work or is that not going to work? You need to get to a ground truth of an answer.

Hessie Jones

OK, so when when you’re actually in the process of getting this ground truth and you’re talking to to people to solidify that, how much and this is something that I always consider have? You read the book the mom test.

Abhishek Mathur

I have. Yeah, I would highly recommend it.

Hessie Jones

OK so. Yeah. OK. So that, that, that’s something I I look to a lot to to validate that there is really a. Problem, but especially when you try to determine I want to go after small banks that have this many employees that have this particular problem that that’s already at what point is that defined within within the ICP because now you’re you’re getting to a point where. It’s now granular and it’s very focused on a specific type of customer. What does that look like in this process?

Abhishek Mathur

Yeah, absolutely. So depending on where a founder is in their overall. Journey if they are all about kind of like discovering what kind of problem they want to solve, then it makes sense to cast a net really wide and be like hey, I just want to talk to anyone in financial services and figure out if. There’s an actual problem. And start like kind of hone in a little bit on the problem. You’re kind of validating that or creating that more refined hypothesis for yourself. That’s when you start to speak with very specific people at very specific types of company. Because it is likely that, say someone in mid sized bank a in function, HR and mid size bank B someone function, function, HR they operate in a somewhat similar way and might experience the same problem and the goal is to always kind of find that consistency. Across different customs. Because the best thing you want to do as a founder is to build something that you can sell in a repeated way over and over. Again to a large number. Of customers. And so if you are saying once again kind of if you’re starting off and you want to cast a net wide, just kind of do a lot of discovery completely fine, but once you start to kind of build on that hypothesis. That refined you want to speak to more refined people. I know, as you mentioned the mom test as well.

Hessie Jones

Yes, please if you could give a high level for everyone that that don’t know about this book please.

Abhishek Mathur

Yeah. Honestly, one of the best books on customer discovery, which I recommend founders to absolutely. Read and then use some of the principles for effectively the thesis of the book is if you were to build anything and you were to take that anything to your mother and say hey, mom, look, I built this thing. Your mom is very likely going to say it’s wonderful. So what you don’t want to do as a founder is to go to folks and lead with questions that will have them agree with you because they want to be nice. Naturally, everyone wants to be nice to people they’re speaking. And the the series of questions that you end up asking and the way you phrase it, the way you are positioning it, it needs to be in a way that you are getting the ground truth answer from the people you’re speaking with and not them just agreeing with you because they’re a nice person. You are a nice person because that doesn’t help you get to. The validation that you need for your problem and get to your hypothesis on product market fit.

Hessie Jones

OK. While other people would argue that, like mothers are more truthful than anything else, as much as they want their kids to succeed, some of them are are not necessarily that nice all the time. So OK, so let’s move to the product side. So when you’re defining your product, take me through the process that now integrates. These customer pain points that you value.

Abhishek Mathur

Absolutely. So the first thing like the way I like to kind of position this as a problem validation, which is kind of speaking with customers and getting validation on the problem that actually exists and who is that problem for. Then the next phase after that is really solution validation. That’s where the product that you’re talking about really kind of awesome, right? So within solution validation. This is where the whole concept of MVP comes in. And this is effectively defining a product and building something that you can start to get a signal from your ICP or your prospective customers that yes, I can use something like this to solve my problem so. There are a wide variety of like ways to actually go ahead and do this, like there’s many techniques around MVPS. There’s. Concepts called like a Wizard of Oz, which means you can build like a website and have everything in the back end done manually so it ends up being like a Wizard of fall. So there’s like many many techniques around building MVP’s that I think our founders should look out for. But effectively what you want to do at that point is as you’re building the product building. The VP you actually really want to build like the minimum set of features, minimum set of components that you can to get validation that the solution that you are providing actually solved for the problem that is that has been valid. Because if you are not doing that, if you’re building for much more than that, the timeline and the feedback loop is going to be much, much longer. And once again, like at this point again you are trying to maximize for learning. Just like in problem validation, you are maximizing for learning and solution validation. You are also maximizing for learning and you want to be able to run as many of these cycles you. Can to be able to validate that the solution that you’re thinking of the. Product that you’re. Building can actually solve for the problem that the ICP experiences.

Hessie Jones

OK. So that leads us to the next question, because it segues from what you just said and you have indicated that a lot of companies even during the MVP stage may over engineer their solution. So what did you mean by that?

Abhishek Mathur

Yeah. So I think a lot of people that love technology, that love products or have built products in the past, they end up wanting to become founders because they just love building. And I think that’s a that’s a fantastic thing like builders should keep building. But one thing that every founder should be careful of is not to get into that rhythm of building so much that you are not. You don’t know what the purpose of that build actually is. And in the earlier stage of the company. The purpose of building something is to actually validate that something is actually going to solve for the customer. So for example, like I’ve advised a bunch of startups, I’ve spoken with a bunch of founders and they tend to want to Polish their product, make that product feature rich, have say data or user sharing capabilities within their product, all built out, only to find out that the core problem that they wanted to solve for. At the beginning. Is actually not being solved for the for the users, so at that point you kind of go back and like re engineer a bunch of things and work on that and bring it back, which takes often months to actually come back and cycle for, but rather what I recommend to the folks that I work with, the founders that I work with is. Build something that solves for the core user problem. If say once again like going back to HR and like payroll example, if there’s a problem with payroll, don’t worry about a multi organization or like a fifty person HR organization. How will HR information be shared from one person to the other? That will all come in afterwards. Those are those. And to become table stakes at a later point. But you want to make sure is that the payroll problem that you’re focusing on that you’re solving for is that is being done really, really well such that the one or two HR people that you’re working with at the company, they love the product and they are getting value from it once you get that kind of a signal, then you can dedicate enough resources to build out the other features and functionality. These you can build for scale and you can see hey, if 1000 people are using my SAS product at one time, is this not going to break like those are absolutely things that you should be looking thinking about at a later point after you have figured out that the two HR people in that company are solving for that peer world problem that you have.

Hessie Jones

I guess I guess it’s really important at this stage to to make sure that that feedback loop is continue. This because if you, as you say, start building out features and you just say, well, a month from now we’re going to ship these features to you and you’re going to try it and then you realize that you wasted the whole month because they didn’t really care about them then that’s a problem, right?

Abhishek Mathur

Absolutely. And that that happens way too frequently in pretty much every single startup. So and that ends up being like one of the biggest time spans and engineering spends, which frankly I didn’t even have to be. So that’s why I like speaking with customers and being in a tight loop with them in that feedback cycle is just so important in every single stage problem, validation, solution validation and then scale as well.

Hessie Jones

OK, so let’s talk about building for scale. Are there specific, I say metrics or or things that you look for to determine? When is the right time to do it?

Abhishek Mathur

Yeah. So say that there’s no specific metric, but. When you think about the overall concept of like quote UN quote growth, growth can happen on the sales and marketing side when you are ready to kind of like pump fuel into fire and you wanna see that explode, there’s also growth on the engineering side and scale in terms like what you’re building, the infrastructure you’re able to kind of handle and the. Volume you’re able to handle on your side. And I think both of those should be happening after product market fit has been validated and has been achieved, which means that the startup is able to provide a core service to your ICP in a way that solves for their problem really, really well and love it, right. So after that point, you know who your ICP is, what the problem is. What’s the key functionality? You can at that point. So on the business. Side start to bring in more sales folks and more marketers to sell the same product out to more and more companies and scale revenue from there. And then on the engineering side, on the technology side, you can hire more engineers, Dev OPS and for our folks to actually scale the infrastructure because as you grow from your first five customers to 50 to 500. Your engineering is going to need to be up leveled to that point, but. The core of this is if you don’t have your first five customers, they’ll be happy. You don’t need to worry about how are you going to get to 5. 100.

Hessie Jones

OK.

Abhishek Mathur

You don’t need to worry about the sales marketing, the engineering side of getting to 500. If your first five is not.

Hessie Jones

Working OK, so talk about some of the mistakes that that founders make at the at at this stage, when they’re the rate of scale, one of them you mentioned was a feature bloat.

Abhishek Mathur

Yeah. So one of them is absolutely future blow just like kind of building for things that are not needed at that moment. And just I think the terminology that end up using is we should have this. The shirts are just like such a killer for companies. They waste so much time, energy of all the employees that are over there because it’s one of those things that, yes, like every you you can justify a should for any product or feature into any company. But you don’t know if it’s needed or it’s a must have at that moment. So I think that’s one of the biggest questions kind of asked for. It’s like when when do you actually need something versus when should or like something that should be built at some point? In the. Future. Yeah, so. Future bloat is absolutely one of those things that I love chatting with founders about as well, and it’s just that you need to be very critical. To assess every item that’s on your road map and see what is actually going to move that business metric forward. So like we’re talking about metrics now a little bit for startups, they should have that goal that they’re looking for. So if your early stage, you’re. Looking at week over. Week growth. If you’re like, growing a little bit, then you’re looking at month over month or quarter or quarter. And what does that growth metric actually need to look like? So for example, it could like consumer app and the users you’re looking at onboarding that needs to grow to a certain degree, then you effectively to build anything and everything on the engineering side and product side that supports that user growth. So if you’re going from 1000 to 10,000 users on your platform in the consumer application, then you gotta look at, hey, what does the next 9000 users? What do they need? They probably need like a better onboarding experience. They probably need a few more functionalities because they’re not the early adopters anymore. So we’re building out those features at that point. On the infra side, you’re looking at onboarding more customers so you get more volume on to your platform. So those are things that you got to end up looking at at that point. So that’s once again like if you start to think, uh if. You start to do. These things, before they need to be done, you’re going to bloat yourself and not get to the critical item that you need to. It’s just how do you do the right things at the right time to allow for all the scale to happen?

Speaker 1

So I used to work at a startup and. One of one of the engineers always told me about this issue. I think they call it squirrelling, but it’s it’s the same thing as this shiny object syndrome. Can you? Speak about that.

Abhishek Mathur

Yeah, effectively the shiny object syndrome is when you’re when you’re in the building mode, you’re looking at, hey, this is like a an awesome thing to actually build out, whether it could be a new feature functionality, it could be new technologies like everyone’s just like, hey, how do I get AI into my business now, right? That’s one of those shiny objects as well these days. A few years ago it was blockchain. And web 3. And then for the engineers, it was like, hey, I want to build for something that can handle 100 million, you know, interactions or queries, right? So this shiny object can mean different things to different functions and different teams. But I think that like you’ve as a founder, you’ve always got to drive it back down to the fundamentals of the business. What is really going to be driving that business value forward at this stage for you? And there’s going to be. Ton of distraction. You’re gonna get on a weekly basis. New tech, new products, new features. Investors will ask for something. Your customers will ask for something. But just like, how do you remain focused on solving for that core pain pain point? That core problem that your company and your product exists to solve?

Hessie Jones

I think it’s almost like every founder needs a good co-founder to bring them back to basics. Because yeah, yeah.

Abhishek Mathur

I think it’s very different for solo founders because you don’t have that other person to kind of have that conversation with ideas off of. And I think as just humans, right, you. Tend to get swayed into various areas you hear news about various like ASR, raising hundreds of $1,000,000. Say hey, I should do something as well, but having that co-founder with you, that partner in crime with you that is able to really pull you back together, keep that. Keep that right level in your head going to make sure that the business that you’re out to build out that you’re building is actually that the core focus and to keep you from getting distracted at all times.

Hessie Jones

I think the other thing to add, especially on that point, is that what tends to make founders derail from that. Focus is the business development side and then they end up talking to potential clients who think this is a great idea, but they want something built a little bit differently for themselves. And so talk about a little bit about technical debt and how how that could actually play. Into into this as you as you build and grow.

Abhishek Mathur

Yeah. Yeah. And I think technical debt ends up being actually one of the potentially nicer things I’ve seen startups where some custom. Worked at large customers have asked for has completely kind of derailed companies off their actual road map, so something that I think is quite. Fast and it’s it’s a bit of a art and a science for founders. It’s how do you balance out customer requests are actually coming in and how do you actually end up hearing them for the core problem that actually exists? Getting like feedback from customers, but also like making sure that you’re getting enough volume of signal from different. Types of customers. To make sure that that is resonating over multiple areas that will actually help you scale your product and scale your company, I’ve been at companies in the past where the biggest customer says, hey, I want to build this. And founders at that point have said, OK, cool, let’s do this, which the Rosa Road map. It is only useful for one customer and not for other customers at that point. So what you don’t want to be is like in that situation where you’re doing custom custom development work. Work because that’s not gonna help you as a tech venture backed startup to scale. Rather, what you wanna do is really kind of peel the onion a little bit more as your customers are saying, hey, I want this, you try to figure out hey, like what is the core fundamental problem? And if that problem the fundamental problem exists across many of my customers, then I should actually build it in a way. That solves for each one of those problems, not just for one customer. So quite important and how you actually do that, how much noise you should, how much of this feedback is noise versus how much of is like actual valuable signal you’re getting for your company. So yeah, you have to really kind of balance all that out. For yourself as a founder.

Hessie Jones

OK, so I want to get into this thing about pivoting because I I mentioned some really big companies that at the start of the show and there are a lot of companies that have pivoted to survive. But you know you either capture the market or you don’t, and it’s a big risk. So how do you know when it’s time to change direction? And what are the common impacts that or challenges that that companies face within their teams within their culture, you know, within their operations? When they decide to do this.

Abhishek Mathur

Yeah, I think pivot is pivoting is very difficult and it’s quite taxing on the founding team. The overall team basically companies should consider pivoting when they have tried. To work in a market that they’re not able to just get any kind of traction on, pivoting can happen on building a slightly different product to a completely different product that’s on the product side of pivoting. Pivot could also be changing the go to market focus as well. So you can initially say work in financial services, you want to move to like healthcare or government. Or telecom, like any of those or retail, right. So that’s like a go to market pivot. So people can come in like different types, different types in different. Areas, or does it completely separate different pivot as you’re talking about? For what Slack did at the beginning of conversation starting off as a gaming company, realizing that. Internal communications is broken, so building out a tool for that purpose, so when to pivot is, I think one of the hardest questions that founders have to answer for themself. If you feel like you have tried a lot to get significant or some level of traction, some level of consistent response from your ICP and you’re just not able to figure that out. And if you’re seeing something else on the side that is starting to resonate with your customers. Seems like something you can build your company off of, then that ends up being effectively a signal that you should consider pivoting. But obviously pivoting is difficult. So when you are actually going through the pivot itself, it’s quite important to kind of as a founder manage the full team around that. So communicating with the team around why this actually happening, what wasn’t working, being transparent with that and what are some of the things that you see. Potentially working in this new space, new vertical new product area that you might want to move into. The team, whether it’s like on the business side or the technical side, they’ve put their heart and soul into the company as is and they’re gonna see kind of a lot of that effort gone out the door. But like the way our position that is that effectively help the company learn, learn what is not working and. Learning what’s not working is almost as good as learning what’s working so super valuable in that sense in terms of what the company’s journey has been so. And yeah, really kind of just being transparent around experimenting on something new that they think is going to be working, making sure that team realizes they’re so kind of valued across all of that. And yeah, taking the company along with that overall journey.

Hessie Jones

Yeah, I think it, I I remember I was at one of the one start up and there was a lot of dissension when the founder came down and said I think we’re as of this date, we’re going to start doing. And he thought a lot about it and he was able to answer a lot of questions about what? What does this mean for my job? Because it it meant that there are some developers that would be that that wouldn’t be needed in this new order. He didn’t want a platform to be built. He wanted. An app to be built instead, right? So that was going to impact their operations. But also the question that when you when you try to I guess involve your staff, there’s always always going to going to be the impact on revenue and the impact on on cost and infrastructure like how much more does the company have to spend to do this and will it start to disrupt the revenue that’s already coming in? How many? Customers will I lose?

Abhishek Mathur

Yeah, I think. Once there’s some level of revenue that’s coming in, it’s very, very difficult to kind of stop that. But I have seen companies do that. It takes a lot of courage to do that, saying that, hey, we have some level of revenue kind of coming in from. I product idea, customer idea A and we want to move that into B. So shutting some of that off. I think there’s like way to kind of a ways to transition that as well. You can say that those service is going to run for X amount of time and start to like channel that revenue into the new product build not doing any more additional build into the original concept. So yeah, it’s one of those very difficult things for founders to say or a kind of pivot B. Manage their kind of company and their staff around it and see working with customers to a make sure they kind of understand what’s actually happening and why is the pivot happening. And then with that route the revenue or try to route the revenue and the new development new area as the.

Abhishek Mathur

And sometimes, sometimes it doesn’t work, and sometimes you gotta say no to that revenue as well. So yeah, it’s one of those challenging things.

Hessie Jones

One last question. So let’s assume that you’ve hit that stage, so now you you’re starting to get a lot of customers or prospective customers. In the funnel. The ones that you have, they’re very happy. And that you’ve reduced churn over time that you’re bringing in lots of revenue. So this this picture is your, I guess your panacea for product market fit. So how do you continue to maintain, I guess a delighted base of customers and and in this? In this growing revenue situation, do you have best practices?

Abhishek Mathur

Yeah. So one of the things one of my previous companies I realized and I saw was that. They’re almost any startup that you speak with any founder you speak with. They will say they’re customer obsessed and almost none of them. Actually are. So being customer obsessed is actually super valuable. Super helpful. I’ve seen that in one of the startups that I worked in the past and it works wonders. And that means making sure you are working with the customer. To make sure they are successful. And if you can make your customer successful using our product that they will continue using it and you’ll have the revenue coming in. So I think one of the most important things is just kind of being in touch with your customer base even as you are scaling yourself as a founder, the company is scaling being in touch with them. I think one of the biggest jobs. The CEO, the founding team actually has is to kind of. Be there have the relationship with customers and being able to get that feedback and signal that you wouldn’t get through your employees necessarily who are managing their relationship after a certain point. Right. So I think one of. The biggest. To maintain that delighted amount of customer base, you do need to continue having that touch point. With your customers regularly.

Hessie Jones

You know the one thing that you’ve said like over and over throughout this is, is, is this thing called signal and it would be great. Not you have to create an AI for that. But I mean a lot of what you’re saying is also intuition and just I guess your intent to to make sure that in order to succeed. You have to be always looking at for validation on the customer side and not just assume that as long as they stay as long as they keep paying that they’re actually happy.

Abhishek Mathur

I’ve been in companies where we have signed multi year contracts with the enterprise customer. They end up using the product for about four or five months and then after that, like there’s no communication from the team to the customer, the customer goes back to the team. And then after two years, we actually go back to them. Hey, let’s renew. What do you think the? Answer is going. To be at. That point it’s not going to happen, right? So it’s just like just because the initial contract sign? I absolutely urge all founders to not kind of step away from the conversation at that point and make sure that they are continually kind of happy using their product. Speak to the users, speak to the buyers in the organization and champions with the organization you want to make sure you are getting that retained use. Image if, say it’s a workplace product, you want your users to use the product almost on a daily basis. You look at slack, the frequency of slack getting used in organizations. I think it’s like it’s very rare for a company to actually leave Slack. And move elsewhere. Right. So that’s the kind of usage you’re trying to attain or strive towards? For your startup, as you’re building this out in the B2B setting or B2C. Setting and once you realize that people are using your product on a. Regular basis they. Will a give you feedback on how the product can be improved and also be like stick around and because they’re just happy using the product and the value they’re. Getting from it.

Hessie Jones

Yeah, yeah. I have a feeling like, especially you, you’re not big enough to be a Google to be basically automate. Sorry, automate your customer service. And **** *** customers in in the meantime, right?

Abhishek Mathur

Yeah. And I think that’s the whole thing, right? Like too many people, too many founders feel like, hey, the company’s scaling. So I need to, like, put some scaling mechanisms into, to speak with my customers. Like, yes, you should be thinking about that. But that that’s not end up becoming customer centricity. Yeah. And speaking with the users of the products speaking with the buyers and the Champions at the organizations, that just goes a long way and just meeting with them like face to face in person every so often is going to be adding tremendous amount of value in the overall relationship relationship, building their customers and getting feedback from them on what’s working and what’s not working. So you can.

Hessie Jones

Go ahead, go ahead.

Abhishek Mathur

Improve that yourself.

Hessie Jones

I have to say that Apple continues to be like at the forefront of customer success. I mean, regardless of their size, they always show up with someone, a human being who is willing to talk to you. And I think that that a lot of big tech companies have gotten away from that and and customer service tends to be more of a that they’re trying to remove it as a call center. When in in fact, it’s an essential cost that you need to actually maintain. OK.

Abhishek Mathur

Yeah, absolutely. And you look at some of the vertical, some of the organizations that do try to automate some of their customer service experiences, they end up being like one of the worst rated in terms of NPS or Net Promoter score. I just really just like working with them, think about when was the last good experience you had working with your telecom provider? Right. It’s like one of those industries that just. They’ll get your money in and they will let you be for two years until you have to renew and then they’ll be like, hey, time for renewal. Give me your money again.

Hessie Jones

Yeah, exactly. Exactly. I I’ve gone through that and unfortunately in Canada, if you live in Canada, you know that if you want to get rid of your telecom provider, you only have two other choices. So they know that they’re going to recycle your business among the three of them. At some point, your lifetime. So.

Abhishek Mathur

Yeah, which is unfortunate. We do see more competition, but like, yeah, I think there’s an opportunity here, a massive opportunity to kind of improve the experience. And I think startups should absolutely put on that mindset. And once again, like I mentioned a couple of times already, this is exactly what customer centricity is. A lot of people talk about it. Not a lot of people show it, and when there’s an opportunity to show it, I think. Founders should actually take on that.

Hessie Jones

I like your other word customer obsession that I absolutely think that that that’s essential for startups. When they’re at the early stages and as they grow and when they’ve already gotten there because sometimes they they forget, right?

Abhishek Mathur

They forget and releases start from the top. If the founders are not doing it, it’s not going to resonate down with the. Rest of the team.

Hessie Jones

OK, I am so happy that we spoke about this. Abhishek and I believe this is going to be of real value not only to start up spot. To to a lot of emerging founders. So thank you for your time today.

Abhishek Mathur

Absolutely. Thanks a lot, Hessie.

Hessie Jones

No problem so. For our audience, if you have topics that you want us to cover, please e-mail us. The communications at altitudeaccelerator.ca Tech Tech Uncensored is powered by altitude accelerated. We are produced by Bluemix and we’re available wherever you get your podcasts. So until next time. Everyone have fun and stay safe.

Host Information

Hessie Jones is an Author, Strategist, Investor and Data Privacy Practitioner, advocating for human-centred AI, education and the ethical distribution of AI in this era of transformation.

She currently serves as the Innovations Manager at Altitude Accelerator. She provides the necessary support for Altitude Accelerator’s programs including Incubator and Investor Readiness. She will be the liaison among key stakeholders to provide operational support and ultimately drive founder success.

LinkedIn

You can also listen to this podcast on Spotify.

Please subscribe to our weekly LinkedIn Live newsletters.

The post Make or Break – Establishing Product Market Fit is Crucial to Success appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>
Demand Generation is Broken; There is a Better Way to Improve Win Rates https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/demand-generation-is-broken-there-is-a-better-way-to-improve-win-rates/ Tue, 02 Apr 2024 15:15:23 +0000 https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/?p=134218 Transcript Hessie Jones So today we’re talking sales. More specifically, we’re going to be talking about demand generation. So just some broad definitions about demand generation. It is a marketing… Continue reading Demand Generation is Broken; There is a Better Way to Improve Win Rates

The post Demand Generation is Broken; There is a Better Way to Improve Win Rates appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>
Transcript

Hessie Jones

So today we’re talking sales. More specifically, we’re going to be talking about demand generation. So just some broad definitions about demand generation. It is a marketing practice. It’s also a sales practice aimed at creating awareness and interest in a companies products and services. It involves various techniques across numerous channels such as content marketing. Social media, etcetera, it’s been around for a. On time and, but it’s existed in in I guess more of an evolving form in the last few decades. Welcome to tech uncensored, everyone. My name is Jesse Jones. And so one of the catalysts for for this changing sales landscape since the advent of digital has been this decentralization of information. So in the past. A lot of companies. Who are primarily the holders of information about a company’s products and services. They actually use traditional marketing methods, methods to actually promote them. So the Internet and digital came along and now these materials and information were more widely available and so. This decentralization gave rise to more platforms and channels of communication, and we’ve seen this in B2C but also in B2B where communities have have risen. And micro influencers, we see podcasts such as this one. We we see more digital slack groups. Companies had to adjust their marketing and demand generation to rely more on and engaged customer base that in the way that was a lot more interactive and. Personalized as opposed to the one. Way it’s also evolved to include more things like marketing automation, predictive analytics, customer intelligence to refine this process to make things a lot more targeted and efficient within this demand generation environment.

Hessie Jones (contd)

So my guest is Matthew Trotter and he says now things are shifting. Again, the buyer journey is evolving and 80% of what is happening of that is happening digitally. And he says that much of it is prior to the engagement. With the sales team, so that’s going to end. And you as a as a as an organization thinking rethinking your ideal customer profile. So what is this order of new demand generation? What do sales teams need to do to improve their win rates, especially with this evolving buyer journey so? Matthew, thank you for coming. I’ll give you a little bit of background on Matthew. He has 25 years of experience in technology, sales and consulting. He’s an expert in data AI cloud solutions with a proven track record in designing, positioning, selling and delivering large scale and complex IT programs for some of the biggest enterprises. So he’s a high performance sales coach as well. And Co founder of Signal, LED sales groundbreaking sales framework to help a lot of go to market teams address some of these challenges with selling and this digital buyer journey. So welcome. With you. So OK, so. Let’s get into it. You’ve been you. You’ve had a seasoned career in sales. So tell me about your perspective on demand generation, how it evolved over time. What did it look like 20 years ago? And I guess when you started? I wouldn’t say 20 years ago when you started.

 

Matthew Trotter

Yeah, it’s been. It’s been a while for sure. And I mean I think you you hit the nail on the head earlier, which is this idea that you know, it’s there’s a function of marketing. There’s a function of sales. It’s ultimately about how do we find opportunity, right? How do we find leads? How do we find deals and then subsequently, you know, work those deals through the. So I think in the traditional sense what we’ve seen over the last 20 years and. It really it really. Hasn’t evolved much more in terms of a process is you’ve got marketing, who’s out there, you know, advertising, you know, the advertising models have changed, right? Maybe not. Billboards on the side of the highway and, you know. Call it, you know, pamphlets dropped at your door, but you know that was. That was definitely a model and a system that was used for for many, many years. And then you know, seeing that continue, it’s just paper click, it’s advertising, it’s banner ads on websites, right, it’s it’s brand awareness when we really think of the the marketing element and it’s trying to make sure that everybody who’s a potential customer understands who you are as a business. And then understands the value you can drive for them, right? So that’s one funnel of. In and then the other is this this traditional kind of sales side, which is where you’ve got a sales team that’s responsible for dealing with some of that inbound marketing, you know, leads. But then there’s also the outbound element of sales, which is now as a salesperson, I have to go and actually create my own opportunity. Where I have to look for customers, I have to go hunting, so to speak. Prospecting. Trying to identify who my customer, my best customers are going to be. I’m going to go, you know, pursue those customers and then you know, bring them into. The business and that’s still. Almost functioning in exactly the same way it always has, so we typically in that that outside sales world we would have someone in the, you know call it sales development or SDR role. And this person is typically making cold calls all day. They’re sending emails and creating sequences where you’re set up for, you know, 15 days of e-mail, and you’re going to get one e-mail every three. Days or they’re going to call you on, you know the phone, and then they’re going to reach out to you on social. And so this persons job is really to go out and just generate leads, which then subsequently get passed to the sales team, right? So an account executive or someone else in the company would take that. And then once that lead’s been called, it qualified. We now have a a deal. The sales team can can chase and this has existed for 20 years, right? And it’s still very, very much the case.

 

Hessie Jones

Today. OK. So but you said that this traditional, I guess the traditional demand generation is broken and so you said you you won’t be able to buy your way out of this problem with tools. So what? Did you mean by that?

 

Matthew Trotter

It’s the way I like to think of demand Gen. being broken is that that the journey that the customer is taking today is an inherently digital journey. And you mentioned at the beginning this idea that 80% of buyers are going through this journey or the the journey, 80% of that journey is happening. Prior to engagement with the sales team, so the customer through digital means is able to do their own research, right? You’ve got all these great websites, ability to review software. So the customer is self educating. Most of the time, right. And they’re going through the process of even getting pricing and quoting can all be done for the most part without engagement from sales and the one to that statistic that you brought up that journey, right, that’s where Gartner expects the buyers journey to be by 2025. 80% of it is happening prior to sales. What’s interesting is the number of customers who don’t want to talk to a salesperson. And those statistics range and vary. But they’re in and around 50%. So you figure half of your customers don’t want to talk to someone from. They want to do all of this research on their own. They want to get their answers on their own and make their decision generally on their own. So how we think about generating demand has to shift in order to address this change.

 

Hessie Jones

So was there. I’m not sure if it was a moment, but over time when you’re looking at, let’s say, your sales performance. Sorts how much of it became a visible problem that things needed to change. Like what? What? Were there any kind of outstanding metrics that identified that, that things were that your sales were not keeping up with the, the amount of information that, let’s say customers were getting prior to making their decision? Prior to even engaging with one year sales reps.

 

Matthew Trotter

Yeah, I think there’s there’s always metrics. Sales is probably the most metric driven, you know company and when you think of the sales development element which is you know cold calls and emails, what conversion rates and so on. You know, we’re always looking at, you know, how are the emails getting opened? If they’re opening, are they clicking on the e-mail? Are they following through with what’s there? How many of those are converting into meetings? And I mean hyper successful reps, right are able like it’s not necessarily dead right. The idea of cold calling a customer is still a very great way of being able to kind of find these leads and and generate leads. But I think the big difference was. Is starting to look at some of these particular incident that happened and so Google for instance, said they were going to clamp down on spam sending. And this just rippled through the sales community, and there was panic. There was mass panic, and they’re saying wait, they’re going to shut off if we send more than 5000 messages to a domain, we’re going to get shut off. And this is it. It it created such a huge concern. And that is just kind of like the a small tip of the spear of what’s wrong. Because the answer that most sales people are looking at when they see that is I I send that much unsolicited mail to people that I’m worried about being shut off. By my mail servers, which is always a concern, right? There’s so many tactics sales teams use to make sure they like. They spin up new mail domains. They do all sorts of things to just keep this volume of messaging.

So we’ve all known this is inherently broken and how we’ve solved it typically is quantity and capacity. So so just produce enough output and it will subsequently convert into opportunities. And So what we’re not doing is using our resources as effectively as we could be. Right. And it’s that conversion rate and what you saw at 2023 was one of those years that I think was a wake up call. Especially for venture backed companies that had tons of funding because the the solution when you have a lot of funding is we can throw people at this problem. And so you end up with a bunch of money. You throw some people at the problem and 2020-2021, 2022, these were years where it was just we saw the huge advent, some of these sales, you know, organizations were just growing and growing and scaling and all of a sudden 23 hits and. There’s this massive kind of downturn in economy. You know, challenges with companies and kind of taking their budgets and what do we do with this giant pool of people who are here trying to cold call and e-mail everyone and it just didn’t produce any results. And some of the best performing startups and companies and growth companies that were doing great in 2020 to 2022. Saw 2% growth in 2020. And they couldn’t sustain those teams. So all of a sudden it was OK we’ve got a we’ve got a cut and it just became this massive kind of layoff structure within within sales of how do we reduce this team and now so they. Have less people. And they still have to deliver growth and output. How to get smarter? So how we’re using those resources.

 

Hessie Jones

So was it, was it? Do you think the the amount of layoffs that kind of forced people to figure out a different way to become more efficient because you said. But throwing people have a problem and sales traditionally has been, you know, the more, the more people, more seasoned sales reps, the higher the sales probability, right. And you’re saying not necessarily.

 

Matthew Trotter

No, and it’s, you know, sales is an expensive organization. We are you know, ultimately the most costly organization and. Business. So it it became typically what happens when you see budgets clamping down and you start, you know seeing some of those economic wins, those organizations tend to shift instead of trying to find net new customers, they tend to focus on how do we maximize the revenue we have with existing customers. Right. So there’s this kind of this? Readjust internally. But you can’t just stop finding new customers, you still need. To continue growing your new logos, right and so the the shift is how they retain, right? So they can cut their churn rates by having better focus on customers, right. So the whole organization just kind of focuses on let’s retain the base what we’ve got. And then we still have this outside sales team that’s here and the idea was OK, we’ve got less people, we still have the same number of customers potential. How do we focus on who we should be calling? Because we have 1/3 the number of people to do it and this is where the evolution kind of had to happen almost organically where, you know the smartest sales reps and this wasn’t necessarily something done from the leadership level where it was just mandated. Is the sales reps going? How can I be smarter about what I do every day? Because I this is not sustainable and so you saw almost this like groundswell change of reps trying to find ways to be successful. And it was like, well, I have to be ruthless about not talking to customers that aren’t going to produce an A result I need. And I really have to focus on. The ones who are.

 

Hessie Jones

So OK, so tell me about that. You say the buyer journey has changed. So this this is a, it’s almost like this new variable that starts to surface. That actually now addresses something that could be more effective in the sales process.

 

Matthew Trotter

Yeah. So with the buyer doing a lot of that research and not really wanting to talk to sales, I think there’s a lot of folks who inherently think, OK, well then this is. A marketing problem. Right? As a salesperson, you never want to just sit back and be like, OK, I’m just gonna wait for marketing to solve all of my issues, right? So you get creative and you have to. You have to think about this. And so the the magic word that kind of came to light was this idea of intent. Right. So, you know, I can sell my product to millions of different. Types of customers. But if I have a limited. Resource which is time and I can only focus on the ones I need to focus on. How can I refine this and and so this is where the the idea of the ideal customer profile came in right? So we started, you know, and this again has been pretty similar for the last decade and it’s creating a firmographic. View of who your ideal customer is, right? So you make a product. Maybe it’s ideally targeted in healthcare institutions who are between 1000 and 5000 users and you know they make $500 million A or a billion. Dollars in revenue. Whatever the case, maybe you’ve created, you know, some guardrails for your sales team to say. These are the customers you want to go after and that’s kind of removed the chaff from your your prospecting goal and that’s great. But that’s still very wide and there’s a huge number of those customers that aren’t able to buy. Are in no position to be able to buy. You know, perhaps there’s no budget, there’s nothing going on in their business that potentially would justify. Maybe they’ve got a competitive product and they’re perfectly happy with it they’ve. Got through your contract all. Of that information is completely irrelevant in when you use just the firm data and the the particular person or buyer, you would be speaking to. So that’s where it started that evolved over the last couple of years and moved into this. What I like to call is CPV 2, which is where now sales teams wised up and said, hey, is there some sort of? Compelling event that can happen. That we can use to layer on top of all of this firm data that we have to again narrow the guardrails and say who can we who can we talk to and that started with the big one was around things like job changes or what we would call like second buyer revenue. So somebody worked at a company that had your product. And they ended up moving to a different. Money that doesn’t have your product? Well, if they’ve had good experience with your product and they’ve gone to another company, that’s a that’s a compelling event, we can potentially capitalize on to get them to buy your product again. So second order revenue, right, that idea or movement into a role, right? A person goes from being a VP of marketing into a CMO. Right. They want to make some waves. They’ve got this new job. Great. How can I help empower that. You know, you being successful in this, this job change. So they’re starting adding these compelling events and that’s where it’s sad. Historically, that’s kind of where it where it’s been and then what I’m, you know, essentially proposing is this idea of moving now the ICP to include buyer intent, right. And this is where we want to get those guardrails down even further because 80% of that journey is happening without us. Why aren’t we just focusing? On the fraction of customers within our account books who actually have intent. To buy right, and I think about conserving my time which is limited to focus on customers who actually are going to be of the higher propensity to purchase.

 

Hessie Jones

So when you talk about the customers with the highest propensity, are there existing customers, I would assume, right, so or how do how do you apply that to to a prospect? Because they have to go down the funnel at.

 

Matthew Trotter

Yeah. So. Some point. Yeah, it’s it can be both, right. And I mean how, you know, we’ve tried to look at this is very much from the sense of net new customer acquisition. So ignoring the existing customer base so to speak and we think of this as new logo. Acquisition. So how do we find this right? And this is the idea that intent can exist in a number of different ways. So we’ve had to kind of classify the different types of. Intent and we’re starting to see, I think 2023 was that big year where you started to see a number of software companies spin up that were like, hey, we need to help solve this tent problem in sales because this is going to help, you know, refine focus and get people, you know, you know, targeting the right customers. And so we saw this big spin up. Of of intent focus. And the idea behind intent is that there’s kind of three real core types of intent, and we, you know, call that zero party intent data, first party intent data and 3rd party intent data and 3rd party intent data has existed for years. There’s tons of different types of competitive intelligence. Solutions that can, you know, talk to you about what a customer currently owns. You know if they’ve got investment or if that customer has been attending certain types of events or webinars or things, you can buy that data right. You can get that from a third party that’s able to kind of educate you on that customer’s intent. First party intent data is really what you’re capable of leveraging as an institution yourself. So if you’re a product company and you make a piece of software AC customer who’s using a free trial of your application for 14 days is potentially going to be doing things within that application. Which can be sign. That, hey, they’re they’re actually showing intent in certain areas and you know this is what we need to be focusing on. And there’s interaction with your existing website and how they browse and use that content, right or they’re downloading white papers and what type of white papers are they using? And then so that’s your first party side and then you go to the zero party, which is social media has really enabled this and it’s now starting to look at the individual within your buyers committee because. For the most part. It’s not just a single person who’s buying. There’s usually a few people who are involved in that, depending on how complex your solution or product is, there could be 10 people involved in that purchasing decision, or it could be a very small transactional product where you only have one or two people, but it’s starting to look across all of those different personas and being able to identify individual action. That has happened signals to be able to say, OK, they’re showing intent. So this person has participated in a webinar that we host. Listed that was available or this person posted on social media about this article that they read on, you know, cyber security challenges within the industry and we’re starting to use all of those signals that are happening across individual. So now we combine these, these different types of intent and we can create a picture. Of you know, essentially who within our account set actually has interest and intent in. Buying our product.

 

Hessie Jones

OK, so so now you have all these signals and you have all these different data sources. How do you get them all into one dashboard so it makes it easy for the for your sales reps to to do all this?

 

Matthew Trotter

Yeah. So that today has been a historically challenging problem because you have 100 different places, to your point of where this data can reside. Sales reps and just speaking from experience, we’re inherently lazy when it comes to where I want to get my data from, so it would be great if they could all be in one place. We are starting to see solutions existing in the marketplace that are designed to collect all of this information and pool it. Startups that are being built. Around this because they’re realizing that this disconnected data ecosystem is a problem. So you know, this is where the evolution of of sales tooling is essentially going like, how can we collect all this information? But it really is only kind of addressing the first part of this, which we talked about which? Is intent right? So. Great, we have intent, but as sales organizations, how they’re handling intent is kind of the way we’ve been doing it for the last 20 years in terms of customer interaction and engagement is as soon as a customer shows intent, we haven’t done any sort of evaluation on what that intent. Means or why they’re showing this intent. We don’t have that information yet. We haven’t done that digging and we reaction. Instead we we immediately say. The intent has created a reaction and our reaction is called the customer or e-mail the customer, and that’s the limited amount of direction we provide. So as a sales organization or a sales maker, I’m basically told this customer has intent, go call them. And it’s a very generic answer. Right. And it’s it’s, it’s leaving so much on the table, especially when you think. The customer would. Prefer to probably not talk to you, so you’re calling out of left field and saying hey, I noticed you’ve, you know been. Clicking around the website and you’ve done all these. Any chance you? Want to get up on a call? Probably not. I’m more than happy to continue hopping on the call. What value are you adding to this conversation and that’s?

 

Hessie Jones

So yeah, I just. Want to add in there just because I’ve been on the other side from a marketing perspective is like what are the the different incentives that you as a marketer can do to try to get people to take action, right? And so everything from my direct marketing days has always been about attribution. What specific thing did you do that made them go to the conversion page? They may not have converted, but they got there. So what other things can you do to actually get get them to go further right. And so things like clicks or impressions. We’re so far away from the conversion. Mark that you know, downloading a White paper seemed to be seemed to get closer to it, because if they’re interested in downloading the White Paper, then obviously there was some kind of relevancy that was attributed to that specific act. But now you’re going further and you’re saying, you know, it’s not really all that stuff because they they may want to download that white paper, but they do not want to hear from you at all. So what are the specific signals that you’re looking for when when you’re trying to discern like, the the? Best path forward for customers?

 

Matthew Trotter

Yeah, I think there’s one thing you said there that I really want to kind of touch on, which is this idea that they don’t want to. Talk to you. Right. And it’s when they don’t want to talk to you. How are you? How are you able to even get in here? And I want just everybody to just remind themselves of why you don’t want to talk to a salesperson. And it’s it’s having been someone who’s been in this for a long time. It it comes playing back to a very simple thing. It’s like. I am not adding value. Right. If I’m capable of adding value to a customer, a customer will happily have a conversation with me. But more often than not, and I mean, just open your inbox. There’s a lot of completely irrelevant, valueless conversations that are trying to be started which says I’m going to just ignore this so you know it’s getting ourselves back in this head of how can I, as a salesperson in this new world. Add value and it’s not. Oh, they’ve shown intent. Call the customer. Oh, they’ve shown intent. They’ve done this. Call the customer. It’s being able now to say. They’ve shown intent. This is the intent that they’ve shown. Why? Like, let’s understand what it is that’s caused that. Why? That’s happened, but let’s then subsequently create and this is what we call within the system, an intercept which is relevant to the type of intent or signal that we see, right? So you know a person to the point of downloading a white paper, that white paper. Says something specific, right? There’s a particular outcome. It’s aligned to a particular industry. There’s some piece within that white paper that makes it intent based and relevant to your potential customer. The answer is not go call the customer. It could be that could be through your evaluation that the very next step, the correct next step. Is called customer. But for the most part, it might not be. It might actually be. If this is the thing that’s of interest to the customer, the correct next step could be. Here’s an invitation to a webinar we have that’s talking about these exact things, right? Because that is of value. Right. And it’s understanding that if you can continue to add value, the customer will be way more receptive to wanting to interact. With you as a salesperson.

 

Hessie Jones

You’re actually trying to remove that. That whole old adage about the used car sales guy who is willing to talk to anyone to try to improve his sales. Sales close rate but for from this perspective it looks like you know if you identify the right customer at the right time from the beginning, then it probably will make you more effective, right and efficient. I would say, right.

 

Matthew Trotter

Yeah, 100%. It plays back to just this idea of the Pareto principle of if I have 500 a thousand 3000 accounts, especially in that sales development type role where you are handed lists of customers, it’s very rare that as a sales development Rep, you’d end up with 30 customers. All this you’re going to end up hundreds if not thousands of customers to call and dial. Every day. Three months, the question becomes, OK, great. How do I reduce this narrow my guardrails so I can actually tier all of these customers into these are high priority because we can filter for intent and we know that these customers are the ones we need to actually curate the journey for. And be able to have an actual plan of attack. Right, so there’s. Kind of the two elements. The 1st is the planning side, which is. How can I be better focused with my time? Reduce who I’m trying to reach out to because my time is protected and limited. And then the second element is once I know that these are the people I’m reaching out to, what are the actions and steps that I take in response to each of these types of signals? And that’s what’s missing today. That’s what’s broken. So we have all sorts of sales companies who’ve gotten on the wagon of intent intent’s important. We got to do intent, right? OK, cool. Now, there’s all sorts of intent systems and people are starting to build all of these tools and. Frameworks around intent, but what they haven’t addressed is the generic response of the signal or the intent, right? They’re not actually coming up with a real what is the next step in this journey? How curating this journey? It is a very action reaction type of approach. Versus we’ve created the journeys appropriately based on the types of actions and intent. Signals that customers are showing us.

 

Hessie Jones

OK, so I. I would assume that that’s going to be like a test on a case by case basis until you figure out like what are the best practices when it comes to like these specific intents. Is that right?

 

Matthew Trotter

Yeah, there’s, there’s no hard and fast rule on what equals what right each company and product team, each marketing team they your product is unique, right? How it works, right? The people who consume your product, right? The people who sell products to security teams versus people who sell products to marketing teams. Completely different person. And so the exercise is really going through taking your ideal customer profile and starting to now map intent, both the zero first- and third-party layer and understand when we have these signals. So this is how we’re going to filter our account list down to the customers that. We really need to focus on and then. Throughout the quarter and whenever we’re pursuing these customers, what are the exact actions that we take based on the types of signals and intent that we see, very specific journey and marketing as a piece of this right they potentially can, you know overlay and you know they’re doing their own kind of cover cover fire on these accounts and they’re still doing the thing that the sales team. Really needs to make sure they’re. Time is focused in the area it. Needs to be focused.

 

Hessie Jones

Yeah. And I I would think it would go back to first principles like being really a good listener and once you have them now, it’s like just validating that through conversation, right?

 

Matthew Trotter

Yeah, it’s think of like being a good listener now as being we kind of talked about this idea of the. SDR role has to evolve. Into an intent analyst. A person who can look at this intent. And then subsequently identify what we need to do with it to be able to say, OK, here’s our focus area, this is how we’re going to respond to this customer. We’re curating this journey so we can create a better buyer. Right. Because remember the buyer self educating. So if if I just leave buyers to their own, you know thing the the company with the best marketing website and you know all the best reviews on the. Internet is going to be the one. Wins and so I can’t do that as a salesperson, right? I have to be able to try to, you know, shift that conversation, but do so in a way that’s actually, you know, aligned with these different types of signals and intent. So that building a better buyer is really that, that idea that we’re trying to embrace here.

 

Hessie Jones

It seems to be obviously a lot more dynamic these days, so you have to keep on top of the customer. OK, so last question, so your, the your company is developing this method through signal led sales. So what’s been your experience so far in in applying this framework? And what has been the outcome compared to not using it before?

 

Matthew Trotter

Yeah. So it’s had a massive change in terms of amount of outreach, right. So what we’re seeing is just this reduction in amount of outreach and that I think for a lot of organizations is a big, it’s a scary topic, right? They’re always worried about, hey, if I go into my HubSpot. And I’m sending. Thing you know, 10s of thousands of unsolicited messages, there’s a very real possibility hotspot might jump me off or, you know, I’m violating the terms of use of of these mass mailing solutions, because I really don’t have the customers now consent to be, you know, doing all of this cold outreach so. Seeing a massive reduction in that is is kind of step one right and then the focus area really makes sure that we’re having more informed and intelligent. Discussions with the. You’re still going to always find situations where you know this information is available, but the Rep who’s potentially engaging with the customer hasn’t, you know, taken the time to really consider that information. But the reps, who are in tune with kind of the approach and why it makes sense, are definitely seeing a higher outcome in terms of, you know, more informed conversation with the customer, better understanding what the customer is looking for, which is leading to one faster opportunity like faster opportunity conversion rate. So from the time the opportunity shows up until the time the opportunity closes, seeing that time horizon reduced because there’s way better understanding. Of exactly what’s? Happening and then being able to actually increase, you know wins within the account because you have actually influenced that customers buying journey? Before any other vendor had the opportunity to potentially do it because they were in the same boat and this is the thing you have to remember, if everyone’s using intent. Because these tools are, if you’re using the intent data your competitors are using the intent data, everybody’s apparently educated on intent. How are you differentiating your sales motion versus someone else? And it’s really on the intercept. Aspect of this. Which is what are we doing? In reaction to the sin. Right.

 

Hessie Jones

It almost like you need an AI to actually beat them at their own game. If you all have the same data. But I mean that I. I think that’s learning right and that’s it’s it’s being able to have access to that information as it becomes available.

 

Matthew Trotter

Yeah, access is one piece right like and again it’s it really does play back when you think of a sales organization you are trying to find your way to have a leg up and when everyone has access to the same tools, right, you look. At the. Sales tooling world right? This is why you can’t buy yourself out of this problem. Everyone can buy the. But it’s not actually the answer, it’s really only one component and the 2nd component is having an accurate and effective strategy for. What does this mean and how can I subsequently then guide the customer without them feeling like sales is adding no value to this right and all of a sudden myself team is actually highly valuable and they’re actually influencing this?

 

Hessie Jones

OK, perfect. That was a great closing remark, Matthew. Thank you so much. This is this is going to be valuable because we have a lot of startup organizations that are getting to a point where they do have to scale right and that they’re trying to do it in ways that that is less tools based. But more I would say. I don’t know if if they if they could use the gut to define when’s the right time to talk to somebody. It is really intent and if you think about it, it’s more intuitive than you think. But now we’re trying to somehow operationalize it right in our systems so that we can be effective and create. Maybe a standard or process overall within the organization?

 

Matthew Trotter

Yeah. And I mean this is the playbook model, right? Like a sales leader who has a playbook and says this is how I do things. The interesting thing that you know, I see. Is that you’ve got sales leaders who saw great success in 2019-2020, 2021, built these playbooks around this model that was really built on scale and having a lot of money being pumped in the organization. It’s like, oh, we’ll solve this problem. You want to go from 10 million to 100 million, awesome, we just throw. 30 SDR’s at this they go. Cold, cold people we bring on. And the reality is, is that funding vehicle doesn’t exist. That money’s not there, and it’s work smarter, not harder, which is kind of the new the new world. And so those playbooks that were built aren’t exactly relevant in a lot of cases like, yeah, there’s some good stuff in there, but we really do have to shift. To efficiency and how we do help out.

 

Hessie Jones

That’s awesome. OK, so intent intent based selling the new order for demand generation. Thank you so much Matthew for for taking the time to providing some of these really, really helpful tips to for for our founders to increase their sales effectiveness. I’d love to. I’d love to connect you with some of them if they’re if they’re interested in learning about the the the most efficient ways to to become more effective in closing deals. So for our audience, thank you. If you have any topics that you want us to cover, please e-mail us at communications@altitudeaccelerator.ca in the meantime, everyone have fun. And stay safe.

 

Matthew Trotter

Thanks Hessie.

 

Hessie Jones

Thank you.

Host Information

Hessie Jones is an Author, Strategist, Investor and Data Privacy Practitioner, advocating for human-centred AI, education and the ethical distribution of AI in this era of transformation. 

She currently serves as the Innovations Manager at Altitude Accelerator. She provides the necessary support for Altitude Accelerator’s programs including Incubator and Investor Readiness. She will be the liaison among key stakeholders to provide operational support and ultimately drive founder success. 

LinkedIn

You can also listen to this podcast on Spotify.

Please subscribe to our weekly LinkedIn Live newsletters.

The post Demand Generation is Broken; There is a Better Way to Improve Win Rates appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>
AI and the Future of Passwords with 1Password CEO Jeff Shiner https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/ai-and-the-future-of-passwords-with-1password-ceo-jeff-shiner/ Wed, 27 Mar 2024 19:24:33 +0000 https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/?p=134166 Transcript Afternoon, everyone. My name is Hessie Jones, and I’m happy to be joined by Jeff Shiner at one password. And today we’re going to be talking about AI and… Continue reading AI and the Future of Passwords with 1Password CEO Jeff Shiner

The post AI and the Future of Passwords with 1Password CEO Jeff Shiner appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>
Transcript

Afternoon, everyone. My name is Hessie Jones, and I’m happy to be joined by Jeff Shiner at one password. And today we’re going to be talking about AI and the future of passwords. So what are the implications? Everybody’s talking about AI in this conference, but what are the implications of generative AI on cybersecurity and will to change the threat landscape for better or worse? And more important than that, what is passwordless technology and how will it actually combat some of these threats? So I’m here to speak to Jeff about this and talk about One Password technology. So welcome, Jeff. Thank you. Thank you. 

Okay, so before we get into this topic, let’s delve a little bit into your background and your journey to one pass through. Tell me what that was like. So I’m an engineer. I’ve been an engineer since I graduated at Waterloo in 92. So quite a while ago, spent a decade at IBM working on compilers left, went to a startup, was called back to IBM to build their ecommerce platform. From there, I moved, actually. Well, I lived in Canada still, but I did the Road Warrior thing in the US. 

 

For about six and a half years as an ecommerce consultant and then came back to run One Password in 2012. Okay, awesome. So everybody here knows that data has value. I don’t think that’s actually going away, especially with what we’re seeing today. So the rise of generative AI has actually exacerbated this massive collection of information on the Web, and it’s created by all of us. 

 

So now we’re seeing a much more advanced market demand for personal information, and now there’s even more risks to individuals. At this nascent stage, do you actually see a larger threat and whether or not these large language models can be trusted? Yeah, so I think when we look at it, there’s a term I like to use which is online first, identity. If you think of the last, let’s say decade or so of the Internet, it started off where you would browse sites but not provide data. And then over time, you would start to take action, say, for instance, purchase on sites, and you would provide a small amount of data, important data, but a small amount of data. And as that progressed, you provide far more information online now than you’ve ever done before. Not just logging on and providing credentials or providing your address or your credit card, but also the reviews you leave, the reviews you read, the shopping patterns you have, the social interactions that you have. And all of that data is tremendously valuable to the large language models and is ultimately used to make decisions. 

 

And when you think of a large language model or you think of Chat GPT or any of these, they will take all of that information and they will formulate an opinion, be it about a business or be about any of us, the old way or still the current way. But the short lived way is if I want to Google something, say I want to Google one password, I’ll see a list of results. And as a human, I can choose. Do I click on the onePassword.com link and learn about what onepassword says about onepassword? Do I click on a review site, do I click on a newsletter? But in the world of AI, it’s going to give you an opinion of that topic and it’s going to state it as fact. And that can be incorrect. It’s interesting because if anybody has ever played with Chat BT, this is the reason why a lot of people are moving away from Google, not on math, but in particular is because you can get much more granular with your search props. And from this perspective you could actually now I think they’re starting to find surface much more new risks when it comes to people. 

 

Bad actors actually asking Chat GPT to do specific things that could actually harm people in manipulation, in impersonation. We’re seeing ad tech data brokers that are aggregating and profiling information. But if you think about generative AI, are you looking at this as being able to create much more sophisticated attacks against not only groups, but now individuals? Yeah, absolutely. Now again, AI has many, many very useful, positive uses, but it can be used for ill as well. So a good example is the recent move it breach that’s affected a large number of companies and governments. And there’s been a lot of personal information that’s been taken as a part of that breach. And when we look at things like generative AI, what it can do is it can use that information to understand and then target attacks against individuals, either those specific individuals or others that they may know using that information. 

 

So whereas today phishing is a great example I actually got, which I’m sure many of you probably got, I got one a couple of days ago. It was a text message from the Canada Revenue Agency saying, we have a refund for you if you would just log in, provide your bank information, we can give you money. Not at all suspicious, right? But imagine a much more sophisticated, targeted attack where it’s giving me information about myself, giving me information like my social insurance number, it’s giving me information about when I had submitted my taxes and that it can become a lot more believable. And this is what generative AI has the power to do, is to change it from sort of a splatter paint attack into a very targeted, very believable attack. And I think more and more we need to look for ways that we can combat those sophisticated attacks. Okay, so let’s look at this from a password perspective. If there’s so much information out there based on every individual, is there a probability that generative AI can even guess my logins and passwords? Yeah, it’s a question that I’ve gotten before. 

 

I think it’s a fascinating question. Does Generative AI know enough about me as a person to guess my password? Right. And it’s not unreasonable to assume because a lot of people use passwords. Again, I like to say somewhat jokingly, like fluffy cat. Right? If I have a fluffy cat, that’s going to be my password. I don’t think it’s going to get to where it can guess your specific password. But we did some research. 

 

It’s two years ago now, so it’s probably even worse. But two years ago, we did research with the hacking community, the ethical hacking community, on what it would cost for guesses. And so how many guesses can they get for a certain amount of money? And through that research, we found that it takes $100. And it’s like crypto mining. It’s electricity costs for $100. They can get 10 billion guesses at your password. So then the question becomes, do you have more than $100 worth of information behind whether it’s PayPal Amazon, whatever the account is, and can chat GPT? Well, not chat GPT, but can AI in general help narrow it down or give algorithms so that they can guess it in that first 10 billion guesses? And I think the answer in most people’s cases is, yeah, it can. 

 

That’s kind of scary. So let’s move into data hacks, because those seem to be a little bit more sophisticated in being able to extract a lot of that information. So you have a system that’s supposed to protect people’s passwords. It’s also a way for people not to reuse the same password over and over again. Tell me about the benefit of putting all your people’s passwords, my password, into your system. And how does that help me and give me some kind of security that my information is safe? Yeah, again, I think people have heard this before. In general, it’s strong, unique passwords have a strong password that’s been machine generated for every different site or app that you use. 

 

And then the question which I think you very reasonably ask is, well, what about one password? Right? There’s an account password or a master password to one password. What happens if we get breached? All of my information is in one place, and I think that’s where what we do is meaningfully different. So when you sign up for one password, two things happen. One, you choose an account password that you as a person are going to remember and use to log into one password. But secondly, we generate a secret key, which is a machine generated password that stays local on your device. We never get it as well and is a big 128 bits of gobbledygook. And what that prevents is if we ever were to be breached, and of course we haven’t, we’re going to kill ourselves. 

 

Not to be. But if that happened, it’s not guessable. And those 10 billion guesses are irrelevant because even if you chose Fluffy Cat as your account password. That machine generated strong, unique password that we generate for you gets added to that and makes it essentially unguesable. And so all of this is tremendously important. And then the next step is how do we go beyond that and remove the actual password and replace it by something new in technology, right? Okay. So I think beyond that, you’ve secured people’s password and their information, but at the same time, people need to be accountable, I would say. 

 

So how are the resources out there that give people the information that they need to actually navigate at the speed of generative AI? If there are a lot of phishing attacks that are out there, what do people need to know in order to protect themselves? I think the most important thing for people to know is there are simple things you can do that will lower your risk of being caught in a breach and significantly lower your risk of a breach impacting you on more than one site. I think they’re the simple things we’ve all heard, but it’s surprising how many people don’t do it. I would say, number one, keep your devices up to date. Apply the patches. So many of the breaches we see are patches that have been out for a while and people just haven’t applied them. So keep your machines up to date. Strong, unique passwords, I think, is another key. 

 

And then the one thing that I think people are somewhat afraid to do, which is talk about security, especially at businesses, make it a safe place to talk about people are going to make mistakes. You’re going to click on a link you shouldn’t have. You’re going to go and say, oh, I think I filled in my credentials on a website that I’m now worried about. And if we’re afraid to talk about that, like I say, especially within your families or your businesses, then there’s no opportunity to remediate that. So from your perspective, because you’re a little bit more of an established company right now, but there’s a lot of startups that are developing great products and technology, but cybersecurity safety of information is not necessarily top of mind. What would you say to them? There’s simple tools that each company can use. There’s a huge and I mean, we’ve seen it at collision this year. 

 

There’s a huge number of cybersecurity companies who are working really hard so that it’s easy for people to stay safe. That’s what we focused on from day one. How do we make it easy for people to stay safe online? A good example of that now is pass keys. So pass keys are here in most part to replace passwords, and you may have heard about them over the last, say, four or five months in particular, and things like that that are step changes in not only security, but convenience. So from a people point of view, if I can replace a password, something that a human has to know and remember with a pass key, which is just more secure technology, but from an end user point of view is leveraging the biometrics on your device, then all of a sudden we can make it simple for a human to stay secure. Okay, perfect. 

 

If we’re going to evolve with generative AI, I would assume that one password also has to evolve. And so can an AI based password system actually adapt quickly to some emerging threats? That where somebody may try to breach a one password. Yeah, so I think there’s a lot of tools. So when I look at it with one password, it was a few months ago, I went to my team and I said to each and every one of my execs, I want to plan on how we’re going to leverage AI in your particular. And that’s true of customer support, it’s true of finance, it’s true of engineering, it’s true of product. Because at its core, I think AI is going to make all of our businesses a lot more productive. And I don’t think it’s going to replace humans. 

 

And that’s something that I think a lot of people fear. And a friend of mine used to saying, which is, AI won’t replace humans, but humans that leverage AI may replace humans that don’t leverage AI. And I think that’s an interesting statement. And so when we look at it from a security point of view now, of course, we don’t get to see anybody’s information that’s in their vaults. For us, it’s an encrypted blob. So when we look at AI and we look at it from a protection point of view, it’s again, a lot of the tools that are leveraged to say, are there attacks on the service? Are there things that are looking incorrect from a security point of view? We look at it in terms of leveraging AI for penetration tests, for a lot of the threat modeling that we do so that we can continue to constantly be aware of the opportunities that are out there for us to improve security and also be aware of the new and evolving types of targets and threats that are out there. It seems like you’re going to be playing whack a mole with this technology as you move. 

 

Okay, so one last question. What is the future of one password look like? So we know that probably in the next five years, we’re going to see a lot more sensor technology IoT we’ll be instrumenting our homes. We’ll have AR, VR, maybe blockchain decentralized ledger come on board. What specific role will your company play when all this starts to emerge? I think the most important role for us to play is we believe strongly that privacy is a right. People deserve their privacy. And when you look at it in terms of a connected world, and more and more things are connected, we’ve seen that over the last few years, your data gets out there and your data gets into the models and eventually is used to form opinions. And I think the role one password has to play is, can we give you the end user, the choice as to where and how your data goes? So if we look at pass keys, a pass key takes something that you know today, which is a password, a credential. 

 

That’s what the Fishers are trying to get at. They want my banking information. They want my passwords. Can we replace that with a token, which is what a pass key is, which says, I have the right to enter this, but that token can’t be used by anybody bad to do anything bad with it. And yet we have many more opportunities like that. You still go to a retailer and type in 4500 and the rest of your credit card. Why? Why aren’t we just providing a token in its place? You still go and you provide your address information if you want something shipped to you. 

 

Why? Why can’t we replace that with a token that the shipping services know but is meaningless to anybody else? So I think more and more, when we look at it from a privacy point of view, can we turn the PII data, the information that we as humans have and and should own and understand where it goes and replace that with things that aren’t personal but still allow us, as humans, to do the business and the shopping and the things that we need to do. That’s amazing. Thank you. Thank you so much, Jeff, for coming today. And that’s it for us. Thank you, everyone, for coming out. Thank you. 

Host Information

Hessie Jones is an Author, Strategist, Investor and Data Privacy Practitioner, advocating for human-centred AI, education and the ethical distribution of AI in this era of transformation. 

She currently serves as the Innovations Manager at Altitude Accelerator. She provides the necessary support for Altitude Accelerator’s programs including Incubator and Investor Readiness. She will be the liaison among key stakeholders to provide operational support and ultimately drive founder success. 

LinkedIn

You can also listen to this podcast on Spotify.

Please subscribe to our weekly LinkedIn Live newsletters.

The post AI and the Future of Passwords with 1Password CEO Jeff Shiner appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>
Evolving DEI within Venture Capital with Gayatri Sarkar of Advaita Capital https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/evolving-dei-within-venture-capital-with-gayatri-sarkar-of-advaita-capital/ Wed, 27 Mar 2024 19:04:19 +0000 https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/?p=134159 Transcript Hessie Jones So today we’re facing several headwinds in this fast-paced tech economy. This is global race to actually win in the advancement of artificial intelligence between the east… Continue reading Evolving DEI within Venture Capital with Gayatri Sarkar of Advaita Capital

The post Evolving DEI within Venture Capital with Gayatri Sarkar of Advaita Capital appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>
Transcript

Hessie Jones

So today we’re facing several headwinds in this fast-paced tech economy. This is global race to actually win in the advancement of artificial intelligence between the east and the West. However, what we’re finding is that there are these clear. Impediments that persist to drive change in our current technologies. That are hampering this speed to win. So there’s this realization of how brittle our systems are because of the homes that we’re seeing, whether or not it’s bias, whether or not it’s deep fakes or the pervasive scraping of data, this has actually permeated a lot of our platforms and communication systems, and it’s creating this increased risk. That we’re starting to see, that’s now resulting in a lot more regulatory attention, public awareness of the things that could potentially happen to ourselves individually. And this is in lock space with the pace at which technology is advancing. So welcome to tech uncensored, everyone. My name is Jesse Jones. Things like ethics, safety are now synonymous with diversity, equity and inclusion, and this has taken. A step front and center when it comes to AI because the technology is so pervasive across sectors, across culture, across society, it’s more important that we ensure that this technology works for everyone. And so this increasing awareness has bled into venture capital and companies that that continue to get funded are dominated by many of these large VC institutions that have historically not been diverse. So I’m just going to give you throw you a few stats on how DI has evolved. Within venture capital female representation, women represented 26% of the VC workforce in 2023. That’s actually increased from 50% from 2016. The good news is that the percentage of firms that actually reported they do not have female investment partners has actually decreased 257% and that’s down from 65% in in 2018. We’re also seeing an increase in in black employees within the VC space. But at the senior levels, black professionals. Only totaled 4%, which is slightly up from 2018 at 3%. What we’re also seeing is that nearly 50% of VC firms surveyed are actually incorporating DI Strategies in their organizations, and that is up significantly. From 50% in 2016. So these statistics start to highlight the ongoing efforts and challenges on improving DEI within the BC sector. I am pleased to have with me today Gayatri Sarkar. And she is the owner of at the at the ETA capital. I hope I’m pronouncing that right. One of the only growth VC funds in the US, and Gayatri is one of the few women LED POC, LED venture capital companies in an already. Tight industry. So we’re going to talk to Gayatri to talk about the state of the VC space, especially when it comes to disproportionate investment for underrepresented. Founders and and also the state of, I guess representation of women and women of color within within the VC space. We’ll talk about DI. Is it working? We’ll talk about our views on on AI, the AI industry where it’s headed, especially since her company is also investing in in. In AI, we’ll talk about her. Her company at the Etha capital, which is a series B fund. She has so many things going on. She has CVC, which is an organization that wants to level the playing field when it comes to curating women, diverse GP’s and LP’s to drive change within within the DEI. So, and we’re also going to talk about her most recent appointment to the Princess Grace Foundation of Monaco. So that’s going to be a lot welcome, Gayatri. 

Gayatri Sarkar 

Thank you so much. I know you for such a long time, but I’m in awe of the amazing work that you’re doing in AI and DI space and I’m so thankful that you have invited me to speak about it and I have not spoken to a podcast for a long time. I think the last one I spoken to. One of the aim podcasts for the Asian American LP GP community, and I’m excited to be here speaking with a friend and we have a lot to discuss. 

Hessie Jones 

We do. We have tons to discuss and I’m in all of the any woman, VC, especially at GP who has started a fund at a time when you know it seems like an uphill battle. So let let’s start with that. Let’s start about your journey to venture capital. How. How did you get here? What was your interest early on to move you towards where? You are today. 

Gayatri Sarkar 

Oh, wow, that’s quite a story. So I never wanted to be a venture capitalist as such or an entrepreneur, because I’m not only a VC, I’m also an entrepreneur. I I this is my fund, so I’m I’m an immigrant. I was doing my PhD in physics and got a job and then moved here. I worked in Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Goldman Sachs. Federal Reserve Bank guys to manage U.S. Treasuries assets for U.S. military Navy also a couple of large banks there, JP Morgan, PNC, GND visa after Federal Reserve Bank I was requested by a couple of large some of the largest hedge funds to join in US in London. And London was a separate, different conversation for my husband and and I decided at that point of time and I think. This was 2015 and I and I do believe there was some kind of a shift that happened cosmic shift because when you when you’re an immigrant and you. Moved to US. Your number one focus is that you want to make sure you maintain your status. Your status quo is your steady check and. So for me. After Federal Reserve, I realized that, you know, I don’t want to be. In the in the hedge fund world, I wanted to be more focused towards technology, but if there is an interest that I can do in technology advancement or finance and that’s when coming from the asset management background to help me a lot that I want to more focus towards venture capital. So I definitely think it’s a it’s a cost make shift. That told me. Like maybe I should think about venture capital. And because as I said, I was not growing up, so I want to be a VC or even while working in asset management, I never had that interest. So I worked in a few VC funds and then we had a small minority TMT fund which we sold it. Then I was working with a $40 billion. PE firm we were looking at a a $1 billion EI fund. Unfortunately, that didn’t go anywhere and that’s when I was thinking. You know, maybe I still have some mileage because I’m. I’m still pretty young for a GP to start their own farm and and one of the biggest catalyst of that decision maker was CVC. So when I was running my other funds, I started a podcast. And in those days, there were the concept of video podcast was not there, so podcast means it is very high profile like SiriusXM and all these things, people go to somebody’s office to do a podcast. And the concept of Zoom Video podcast did not. And this was before Black Lives Matter movement became such a big thing. My question was more like, you know, I come from a different background in tech, and I was a database architect. I was sometimes one of the few women in the room. And I was like, where are the woman ships and women? For peace. That was my first question and I was like why obviously there are many, but why don’t we hear from them and that’s when I started the CVC podcast and I used to invite all the GP’s. Uh women owned funds that have closed their funds and or woman LP’s that are running. Pension funds. So we had OMERS, we had a state Wisconsin board, we had you know some of the largest pension funds. We also had some great representations from as small as fun like Glasswing. It’s from Boston. To fund the funds like Cross Week from Utah to we have representations from General Catalyst and others. So I was very much focused on understanding. It’s like OK, representation matters and that’s how you start the conversation of capital. Deployment and capital liquids to power. As we all know and I wanted to hear from them, their journey and while going through that, I kind of realized that ohh wow, there are not many women. We’re working in the growth phase on the growth side of the venture and that’s when that stuck with me that maybe I want to do something in that space. I come from a tech background. So we talked internally and my husband was like this is what I was afraid of. I was kind of mini retired, had a young child. And I was thinking of much more focusing on raising a baby because I in my life at the time I kind of has done whatever I wanted to, and this is a something I should tell you while growing up, I never had a role model. Because my mom was a house maker and she’s amazing. But when I see my mother-in-law, she’s a Wall Street banker. She has worked in an area in a completely different time, but I wanted to grow up to be a receptionist or something like that or an astronaut. Astronaut did not work. I’m obsessed with space, but I was like, OK, being a reception. So I always see this Pretty Woman sitting at a corporate job, and I was like, that’s amazing. And this is where the problem in the society is that we don’t see much representations. So coming back. Yeah. And that’s how we started that Veda capital, the name Advaita means it’s I I come from an atheist family. But I found my own spirituality it it it came from. Of philosophy in the philosophy which means non duality. And if you think about quantum physics or Schrodinger’s cat, the Observer is deciding in which state we are, and that’s where it’s like. I cannot think about a better name that points towards the entire cosmic spiritual that exists, and the quantum physics of it all. Which is non duality. So I do believe you know space-time and other things work very differently some. Times and whether we live in a simulation or where we are, we just don’t know. But at the same time, I wanted to choose a name which was very unique and also most of the tiger. So quite other names are taken. So I named my farmer devera capital. So we invest from series C onwards. Our thesis is deep tech. We invest in technology that is advancing human race and decarbonization, focus and energy transition. So we invest in companies with 25,000,000 AR. We have invested in Canada also in one of the top generative I name. Our checks are 10 million. Onwards. But we can write 50 million plus checks as well. I’m based in Boston. We have some team members based in West Coast. We primarily invest in us little bit in Europe and Israel and we are hoping that down the road we can do a little bit of early growth of series. And be so that we can write further checks on the decarbonization focus that we have because there are not many companies to write checks who has 25,000,000 ARR in the decarbonization. 

Hessie Jones 

So. So you you had said something earlier about being one of the few funds that was actually in the growth stage of that venture capital? What were you? What were you seeing with the I I guess the other women GP’s were they more early stage and? What was? I would say, what was your foray into into the into the venture capital space? How was your firm received by those had been there for quite a long time? And you are now kind of stumbling into this community of this tightly knit group of I would assume a lot of them are Silicon Valley lead, you know, VC institutions. Tell me what that. Was like. 

Gayatri Sarkar 

  1. So that’s a that’s a lot. Of questions. So I think we. Are one of the few women. Person of color LED venture capital firm in the industry and in the growth side, not in the early stage side. There are some amazing women doing early stage venture capital. We decided as I said decided to focus on growth because of our background the team is. Very private equity. And we have a lot of Harvard, MIT PHD’s, Yale, under my CFO, she’s Yale undergrad Wharton. MBA’s 20 plus years of venture capital experience. So we come from a little bit of a large asset management background and we and also the deep tech background having that experience, we felt we are much more suited. To do what we can do. Plus there’s a black hole there and I think the main focus was like can we invest in more women and unfortunately there not. Woman out there in the growth stage and our main focus is investing in extreme outliers. The companies that are actually creating major growth and it’s going to be major outliers in the industry. So obviously, Jerry Vehi is one of the space ship designing again. Circular economy, but not in software SaaS space, but more in the heart deep tech. Please. And what was your other question? I forgot. Oh, fundraising. That so? I want to be mindful because I know my compliance don’t like to us to talk about fundraising. But we are a growth fund, so obviously fundraising is all institutional LP. It was very tough. It was very difficult. In order to have that conversation, but you know one thing I’ll tell you, I have a I’m a single child. I always say I have a single single child syndrome. If you want it, you go for it. And someone who studied physics and math, physics, math and economics, it’s like you need to understand the first principle thinking. Of how money moves, and one of the first decision we made is like we cannot take money from Ultra High net worth individuals. Or a smaller family offices because it’s a good fund. We need larger sum of capital. We need larger sum of capital for separately managed accounts for follow on for Co investment. So our thankfully all our LP’s are large institution. It took a long time to convince but one of the things I never compromised was our deals. We only invest in extreme. Outliers the best of the best and obviously some of the people we are competing on. The CAP tables are Sequoia, thrive and others. There are big existing firms, but you know, Once Upon a time, they also have started. So we think there is a new world order that is coming in venture capital space and we are happy to be a part of this right now because we believe that as you will see more changes will be coming in venture capital space. Some of the. Older farms are winding out. We are seeing it and newer farms are coming. Thing and they will establish themselves and that’s where we think we need to work really hard because the number one focus and you know in any asset management firm we we are a venture capital firm but we learn like an asset management firm is you know returning money for your limited partners and. And we don’t want to sway away from that because we are not doing any charity and we are investing. We are very much focused on what can we give back on our limited partner side and. We want to keep that goal, but also at the same time, we want to invest in the areas that we understand taking the risk. Mitigated approach is very important for us and we are extremely thankful. Sometimes I cannot believe that. We have support from so many institutional. From all around the world, but also the fact that they believed in us that we said that we are going to do it and we did it and they believed in us. One of the thing about success I’ve I’ve seen is just showing up. If you show up and you continuously. Deliver what you said you will. I think sometimes the limited part is like OK, you know, she said she’s gonna deliver and she’s delivering. It takes time. It takes a long effort because you’re talking about institution. One of the things that helps us that we all came from institutional background. But at the same time. You know, we said we’re going to deliver and we will deliver sometimes. Takes two to three years of conversion. Any part limited partners, but begin these are institution once. That’s. Yes, that’s a long term. Yes. And it’s a lot of capital that we can manage. But our focus is that we continue to stay in the lane where we think we will do the best also understanding the entire. Macro part that what works, what doesn’t work like we nowadays don’t invest in software and SaaS because we know there’s a big infrastructure shift is coming and that’s why we were at the right time. And and the right place to invest in infrastructure and the team coming from the deep tech background also helped.

Hessie Jones 

  1. I wanna touch on something about the fact that there are fewer women LED startup companies in the growth space in the growth. Side I’m I’m going to throw some some stats at you, would that that talks about this funding gap between males and females, white versus people of color. I want you to respond to it so. A few of. These few female founded companies represented 25% of the total VC deal count in the US. The proportion of the total deal like year over year remained flat at about 17%. These are women LED founders who are funded in Europe. Only 16% of general partners in the VC and VC firm. Well, women. So this is and. And here’s the other thing. Women LED startups still receive less than 3% of all VC investments. How do you respond to this? Like, it’s especially, I know DI is very I still I’d I’d say still nascent in the full scheme of things but do you think it’s working? Even incrementally.

Gayatri Sarkar 

So I’ll say the very first thing that we are talking about it it’s working that people see that there is a gap, but at the same time there’s a lot needs to be done. There’s so many women who had to IPO their companies after Series A and. B Racing because they could not raise. Series C series D Because there is no woman writing larger. Checks for them. This is a major issue. You look at. Stitch Fix. You look at others. Venture capital itself was a very nascent. Asset class. It was not even an asset class and I feel like it was more like, you know, the Silicon Valley, some of the funds that were writing checks and it was also very network based, it still it is, it is very hard to get into cap tables of certain companies somebody. Is advocating for you. Somebody is saying that no, this is a great company. Please take a check and we are still like we are a growth fund. So when we’re writing a check, it needs a lot of board approvals. You know, founder approvals and all these things. But I feel like. There are multiple issues associated with it, and it’s a systemic problem. One of the issue is that I’ll I’ll say is that there not many women running growth Fund is a big issue. When I started my firm and I will not name the consulting firm but we are on major consulting firms platform and one of them said that you know, why don’t you go and raise an early stage fund like raise a $20 million fund. Or like raise. A $50 million fund. And I was like. Our focus is to do growth. Why? Should I raise a $50 million fund? And and how many checks I can write and those checks will not even make any sense. Similarly, a lot of people said Ohh why don’t you raise a $10 million fund and then think about raising something bigger. But I was. Like, OK, We’re talking about completely different set of investments and one thing that you need to understand that the reason. I’m so glad we are having this conversation. Growth investment is completely different than early stage investments. We don’t as such invest in power under unless we have SoftBank kind of a money or tiger kind of money. But then we we’re seeing now what is happening when it’s have too much of money and you have this deployment push that you have to deploy in a certain period of time and you’re like, you know I don’t care. I will build an index fund that doesn’t work. That’s not how venture capital boards venture capital is all about ingenuity of the people. The founder. You cannot invest in a B team and and a product you have to invest in a team. If the product is a, that’s great. If the product is not a, it’s a B product. They can still make it as an A product. So it’s a continuous iterations. And we as an investor are big supporters of that iteration. Is that all I can say now? So many women that are in the early stage, they’re raising money and. I feel like. There’s a lot of support that is needed. For these women to come in the growth stage. But we are. I think seeing many women running early stage successful fund it means that we are doing something good and we will see a lot of these early stage funds, you know. Down the road. We’ll be raising series AB type funds as well. Done. There’s a lot of work that needs to be done, a lot of education that needs to be done, and also the idea is like if you’re a woman, that means you’re only doing fashion or some kind of a woman related stuff. I think that idea also needs to change, you know, whether it is our DNA. Sequence or various other things. Those are all done by woman. My favorite model is Mary Curie, the only person who has won Nobel Prize in physics and chemistry. So. I feel there’s a lot of work that has happened in the past. We need to keep continuously push this. To have seen more capital coming in the hands of women and also the institutionals to open up one thing I can say is that I received zero DI funding 0. And a lot of people expect ohh I I might be having a lot of dei money because I’m a woman person of color running a. Growth fund no. Most of my LP’s, or all of my LP’s, they don’t have as such. DI agenda, who invested in us, but did they back us because we’re a woman on fun? No, they back us because we have the best of the deals, but the reason I’m coming to the point is that I feel like there’s a lot of work that needs to be done at the systemic level. To see we. Give women more support. A lot of women, when they start their company like I had to startups of my own. I had a successful consulting startup. Then I was studying at Harvard. I did a tech startup that did not work out. And those were very, very early days. We are at Harvard Innovation Lab and some of the best pieces used to come and give us advice. We had some of those VC’s who are now, you know, very well known funds and they were like building their fund at that time, who came and gave us some great advices. But. It’s a it’s a long continuous journey. It’s not a Sprint and that’s why one of the thing what I can say is that even to see more women coming in the growth. Which we need to support that. The reason venture capital is where it is today, especially the Silicon Valley culture. The culture is all about even. If you fail, it’s OK. Because even if you fail, the idea is like you might be successful in your second startup. Third startup, 5th startup, 10th startup. The penalties vary less unless you’re doing some money laundering and other things, but. This is where the importance lies that the penalty of failure is less, but the reward for ingenuity is very, very high. And that’s where I think our mindset needs to be. I think for women, they also come up with. Like when our amazing, talented woman we see, we also like, OK. If you’re fundraising, so when are you planning to get married? Are you going to have your kids? Who’s going to look after your kids? This is the questions we get. And. If someone is asking you that question, remember they’re not gonna give you any money. Not a single help. He asked me who takes care of my child? You know, what does my husband do? Or if I am? Out there. Busy, who was managing my kit, who was managing my household. Those LP’s are not giving you a check because nobody’s asking that question to a man. I I think that there’s a lot needs to be done, but there’s a lot happening. There’s there’s check Warner. Car fund and there’s card line. Her fund. I think a lot of them GP’s that I’m naming their funds and now they’re supporting daycare. System to their founders. You know, I have a small child, my CFO. She has a nine month old and a two year old lot of women. Nowadays they have late children at late stage and because we were so busy with our career and I think just making that career changes. Or career flow to be sustainable, making sure that they have that support. We live in a very ludicrous time where I live in Massachusetts, Massachusetts. That’s have unpaid leave, maternity leave for unpaid for a month. I’m so glad I’m not poor and living in Massachusetts. I don’t know what I’ll do with the. One month on. Payment. So I think a woman body needs at least six months, you know, to get back to normal, giving birth to a child. And I think that’s what needs to be ingrained in lot of venture capital. Funds or corporates like how to support this talented, amazing woman who are coming back. Back into the field, I can go on and on on so much of about that. Yeah, but I need that support. Yeah. 

Hessie Jones 

I think so and this is me talking as a Canadian and we’ve we’ve evolved to the point where women now have one year of maternity leave and. 

Gayatri Sarkar 

Amazing. That’s a huge success than we Americans have. 

Hessie Jones 

My mom? Yeah. But there there, there’s a different mindset and Europe is even much more progressive than everyone else. When I was growing up, my mom had. Had six weeks. That’s almost equivalent to what the US has today. Is it not, or have? You got, you’ve. Gotten further than six weeks maternity leave. 

Gayatri Sarkar 

So Massachusetts has one month unpaid Med and Italy. So in my farm, if somebody’s working in my farm, we have unlimited sick leave and unlimited vacation. But again, venture capital is not work. It’s a lifestyle. So people are always working, but at the same time, we have given that unlimited option for somebody to take a break. I have such horror stories from Wall Street days. I was working with a limited partner and there’s a woman with whom I’m working and she was. She’s like gayatri. I need to tell you I’m pregnant. So I’m leaving the company. And I was like. What are you talking about? She’s like, yeah, I’m leaving the company. She’s one of the most talented woman I’ve seen. And she said because it is. I I spoke with my boss and he’s thought that this is much. This is obviously the firm has a very hedge fund style background. And there’s like, my boss said, this is. Much beneficial for me and for my career if I leave the fund instead of taking a long maternity leave, and I was. That is the most regressive, you know. Outlook I have heard and that’s where the things needs to change, you know. And I actually did not take money from that limited partner. I said I’m not gonna take your money because this is the kind of attitude you have. And she was the only woman in their work field. And she’s amazing. She was literally working travel. San Francisco to New York being six months pregnant. She was ready to. Do everything but her farm was not so. You know, so. Yeah, Harvard, MIT educated bosses, you know, right? 

Hessie Jones 

That really saddens. But I mean. That that to me is it’s it’s almost emblematic of like what women go through today. And I think I think that the mindset of a woman is always do things in the utmost. And and with men and. And I think from that perspective there’s there’s a bit of, I’d say confidence level that that that’s diminished compared to men because women have to always step up and be a certain level of perfection beyond what a man. Is proceed to be like the the one thing and I I just went came off a meeting and. We have a lot of founders that come to our accelerate. Better, but for the most part, we’re we’re still heavily weighted male and like it’s very difficult to get women to to say, hey, I need some help. Can I come and they, they are just as qualified, but they will wait until a certain point where they say I need help. But by that point. They’re so far along far beyond what some of these founders are at that they may not necessarily need as much help as as everyone else, but I think that’s the that’s what I find find with women in general. Is that they will have they have the higher threshold of pain and a lower confidence level to to be able to even ask for funding. What’s been your experience with that? I think. 

Gayatri Sarkar 

First of all, one thing I’ll say is that I think woman has imposter syndrome. That’s for sure. But one. There’s another thing I’ll say. I think this is an example given to a friend given to me by a friend that. A tree that bears most fruit. Is also bending a lot then a tree that has less fruit. So am women who are talented and has seen men who are also talented. They suffer from this whether. We are doing it right. I I have team of PHD’s from Harvard, MIT. They ask the maximum amount of questions and like am I doing right? Is this wrong? Is this right? And I think when you see talented women at Workspace asking those questions or having self doubts because they have, you know, more information data among themselves and making sure that they are at their best. But I feel. There is a obviously different way the society is judging us, and many of us, including me, are standing. Over the amazing work that is done by women, I mean I I I was telling you, like, my mother-in-law. She’s a Wall Street banker. She is one of the few person of color she she does not look much Indian but she’s one of the few person of color in the 70s and 80s working in the bank. People and she has a very. Normal name. Her name is Maya, and nobody used to even take her name properly. That was the easiest name and people used to confuse her. Whether she’s Mexican or, you know, or Middle Eastern. And then she the biggest issue with with her is that she was told multiple times. Bring a male coworker so that we can have a conversation with you. Whether it’s a closing of a deal or other, so or people will use profanity in front of her face. That was Wall Street, you know, and we have come a long way. She was all put into accent training. I. And and and. This is the funniest thing I want to say is that my mother-in-law, even if I say that. And she’s like. But you know they. Paid for it. 

Hessie Jones 

Oh my goodness. I I think it’s. 

Gayatri Sarkar 

It’s a different world, you know, and think about people like us now. Nowadays I don’t have to worry about, hey, where is your male coworker? And then I’m going to invest in your fund. So. So that’s why I said like, there are progress that is happening, but it is going to take some time. And and I feel and I’m very optimistic about it, it is not going to happen at a. Super fast pace. Because at the end of the day, we are dealing with not AI, but human beings. And I think there are more mind shift that needs to be changed and this change needs to come organically. I think the biggest change that we see and we were discussing like. As a millennial parent, my as I was saying, my husband is more involved in raising my child. He has done more diaper changes than me where our parents, my dad, was never involved. His father was never involved and my mother-in-law managing Wall Street and raising a kid. So it’s a different time that we are living right now there are. Being just happy and I’m very optimistic about it. That’s all I can say. 

Hessie jones 

  1. No, that’s good. I don’t want to beat that to death because. I know I understand, like even in today’s. Stats it’s very, very. Difficult to for a woman to to raise money, especially if they only have, let’s say, a female female investor that that invested with them in the first round to to get to a second round is almost less likely unless there’s a man. Sorry, a male involved in the first investment round. That’s a stat that I I’ll put out there and I know things will get better, but I wanted to. I want to shift a little bit and talk about technology because. You have this passion for for that these types of technologies that we’re investing in, in the future and I want you to talk about it. Generated AI, there’s there’s been the launch of Sora most recently with open AI and now the ability for to. Develop video from. And you know, you’ve seen the growth of Gemini. You’ve seen a lot of some of the innovations that that are taking place like crazy when it comes to natural language processing that did within general today, where do you think it’s all going and what are? You excited about?

Gayatri Sarkar 

  1. So I come back to our thesis, which is our infrastructure thesis that we believe that we are living in the time of 60s and 70s. The changes that happen and led to the huge growth of Internet, we’re living right now. So this is the next 2530 years. We are going to see the growth of not only just computing power through. The AI but also this will lead to changes in you know opportunistic growth in quantum physics. I mean quantum computing, because we know the laws of physics is kind of a hindrance when it comes to quantum. Putting lot of growth in chip designing, we might see finally, you know, interplanetary travel or something like that or flying cars. And I hope that happens because I feel we are living in a time of a huge infrastructure growth and a lot of infrastructure tech investment is going to happen. The real Silicon Valley. And we were like, OK, where is the Silicon Valley because everybody is investing in app and I think that change is coming right now that we will see, you know, the rise of silicon valleys again. That is right now with open AI X AI or other companies that we are seeing. So I’m definitely positive and that we are living in a time and I’m so glad I’m living in a time where I’m an investor in this space that we get to see so many things. Somebody who studied physics and we have a team of engineers. For us, this is like a huge playground to learn, go through things like yesterday I had more than an hour long session with my team and you know, these are the people we have also former Google, Deep brain scientist in our team. And we were all brainstorming on certain ideas, like OK, for our next investments. Where do you think see the movements coming because for us it’s like when we look at an investment, we just don’t look at a product. Oh, this is a great product. Let’s invest. We want to understand from a macro scale how the changes are happening in the infrastructure AI space. And we want to understand where this fits and there are different thesis they’re different analogy. So I think generative AI. Is at a very, very early phase. We are we are at a phase where it is more crawling and that’s why we are like just like kids, we are like, oh, wow, we can transfer. We can literally translate text into video, text into picture. So. So definitely at a very early stage. And then as when I wear an investor hat, I want to understand where we can actually make money and how. Which are the companies that are sustainable and which are the companies that have some kind of corporate governance to make things sustainable. And obviously there is this. A focus towards open source, closed source and we want to make sure that as an investor where we can make sure have the good return.

Hessie Jones 

So how much of your LP’s, by the way, how much of them care about a portfolio that has? Some kind of, let’s say DEI measurement. Around it like did it is there. Is that going to be injected as one one of the things that your your LP’s will be looking for in terms of how you invest your money? 

Gayatri Sarkar 

Great question. So one of the thing I want to say is that you don’t want to. Be the GP. Where your mission, your ethos, and your thesis is driven by LP’s, my LP’s don’t care, but. One of the reason they chose us also, they know that we care. I’m not going to invest in a company where there’s they could not find a single woman in their team. One of the biggest example is that we were looking at a company and they were serial entrepreneurs. They were kind of billionaires. They had a huge successful. And not they named the company they came out of that company and started. Not a generative AI company, but an AI company that has some defense tech alongside it. And and I asked them I it’s like I love your team, but you could not find a single talented woman in your team. And and he said that. Yeah. Actually we are in part of a country. The which happens to be Connecticut, not very far from where I’m living right now. There are not many talented women, you know we couldn’t find and that’s why we couldn’t hire. But we do have a. Receptionist or I think executive assistant and and I feel like that was not the right answer. It’s OK that you can say that you know. We did not do a good job. In searching for great talent who also happens to be a woman, I run a farm where my entire team is diverse and we all come from great schools and great experiences, and you don’t have to go and say, oh, it’s time to go and look out for. A woman or a person of color, and this is where I think the diversity is failing you. Just like, OK, let me have talented people in my team, but they also happen to. Be a woman so and and and I feel like his answer should have been like, you know, we didn’t do a good job. But I think we will try to find more great talents but not. But the answer is like Oh no, there’s no talent. You know where we’re living and where we’re finding that’s not the right answer. Decided not to invest in that company also. That company was also because it was not an extreme liar outlier. We don’t invest in a company because the company needs to have a diverse diversity mandate. But when we talk to the founders, we try to understand how they look. The world because 50% of the. Population is female, so how you’re looking at your consumers and we are enterprise focused venture capital firm. So we try to understand if we have the similar ethos, the mentality. I know nowadays the IT gets a lot of bashing but I think there should not be dearth of meritocracy and there are some amazing woman. That are coming out of every field. It should not be like you remove two women from your board and the company is working perfect. So we are seeing a lot of such examples and but I hope that. There are changes coming and there will be further changes, but yes, the mandate is not coming from our LP’s. This is our own personal ethos. When we ask questions, we also ask questions like what’s your data privacy. You know, we have invested in one of the top generative AI company because they have a strong focus to generate data privacy. We also ask questions like, what’s your carbon footprint? You know, what are you doing in terms of carbon footprint tracking? And these are the questions that I think every VC should ask, but this is part of our ethos, our operational excellence and I think we cannot keep injecting money in companies who will keep on training models. God knows how long so. We are trying to understand the space from a scientist standpoint of view and also from an investor standpoint of view and also from macro analysis, how the market is going to evolve. So we are in a disruption phase, so anything can happen. There might be a lot of change. Just, but I just don’t want the law of large numbers to prevail, so that money is only accumulated to Microsoft, Amazon, Google and Facebook. And then there’s a trouble because they have, you know, not only lot of capital, they also have the consumer base, clients, customer base to gather. So much of data, so it will be interesting to see how the generative AI prevails, because it’s also. Training data. Having access to this raw data is very important and I think which founder has access to those raw data, so it will be interesting to see and one thing that I want to highlight is that this is we were discussing last year. I mean yes, last night is that. The disruption that’s gonna happen, we don’t know whether it’s an AGI or some other way, but whatever it is and we I can go extremely technical about it. But. We need to give time to this space. I know there’s too much focus. Hey, let’s go to the market. And also there is this focus or let’s inflate our valuation because we also need to keep on raising money to train our Elms. So we will see like who has the first mover advantage, who is making this smart move because if you’re not the best. Then you cannot play in this space and also as an investor you need a lot of capital to in order. To invest in this space as well. So yeah, we are trying to take various game theory approach and various standpoint view to understand that who will be the winners. I’m glad I’m in this space as an investor as an audience. Just trying to make sure we take very risk mitigated. Approach so that you know there’s not much of a loss for us and there’s more betting on good founders and we can be a good supporter to those founders and be rightly their, you know, partners in making. Assure that when it comes to building great products, right mindset is set. Not what we’re seeing with few other things that we were discussing before. 

Hessie Jones 

Yeah, I’m glad that you’re. You’re actually kind of stepping out of the, I guess the the common fold and asking questions. That maybe some VC’s may not be asking right because it it is a balance between. I mean, how how fast can you grow? How fast can you actually deliver this? What is your revenue stream? But now can we do this in a way that’s not going to harm this type of population or etcetera, right? There is a responsibility from that perspective. OK. So I know we’re kind of running out of time. I do want to get to 1. Questions about your most recent appointment as a Crown crown patron for the Princess Grace Foundation of Monaco. So can you tell me about about? That that sounds so. 

Gayatri Sarkar 

Fascinating. Yeah. Thank you. So we have been working with Prince Williams Foundation because we are an official nominator of a short prize and then Prince Albert of Monaco has a similar ethos when it comes to climate change. He’s a big he has a big focus towards ocean tech. And we as a growth investor, we are keenly looking at the blue text space to understand there’s a lot of R&D. That goes into it, and as we understand the space, it was a great opportunity for us for me to be a Crown patron of Princess Grace Foundation, which is Prince Albert’s mother. But the main focus of the foundation is that how can we enable, you know? Underserved communities in the artist space. Who can be the next Oscar winners, Grammy winners and some of the other Crown patrons are John Paulson, Leslie Odom Junior, Chuck Royce, Lady Tina Green, John Chu who is the. Director of Crazy Rich Asians. He’s also one of the actually previous winners of the scholarship from the foundation. So one of the thing that interested me into this, as you know, general. Right. It’s going to disrupt many spaces, but the very first. Space is the. The Hollywood industry, the films and others, so we want to see that what we can do to make sure we can be much more, you know, mindful of the disruption that is happening in the world, but also at the same time. Understand how the AI space is moving me as an investor looking at this opportunistic world. But you know we are looking at this more of philanthropic approach for us and also working with Prince Albert’s Foundation on many of his climate change space. 

Hessie Jones 

Yeah, I’m looking forward to seeing like, how how that’s going to be deployed and the and the types of I guess, artists and projects that that are going to come out of it and how they’re going to thrive in. The coming years. So thank you. Thank you so much. 

Gayatri Sarkar 

Can I just add one more thing that the few things that I wanna touch base on? That when we talk about diversity, equity, inclusion and that has been the theme of our discussion, I want to say that it’s a long, it’s going to take a long time and a long process, but we also need to be making sure when we are deploying capital in the diversity, equity inclusion. Space, where is the accountability? If somebody is giving you the dei money? Is there an accountability towards it? The reason I’m talking this about because we just saw Goldman Sachs JP Morgan coming away from the climate action 100 and again they raised a lot of climate fund and currently them coming out of it. There is no accountability. Similarly, Goldman Sachs also had a launch. Platform, which was also a DI focus. So one of the thing I want to highlight is. That to a lot of institutions where the pensions are others, if you are focusing on investing money in a diverse GP, go and do that, invest in a fund that is owned by a diverse GP rather than allocating the capital to thousand other middle layers, then that gets dedicated to you have no accountability for. And then the output looks bad. It’s the same situation where Black Rock and others said that you know I’m going to invest in ESG, but actually it ended up investing in oil and gas, but in a better scenario. So I what I want to highlight most in this today’s world, it’s like we need to be mindful. Everything starts with good intention. Investing in climate, investing in diverse founders, investing in diverse funds. But in the process we get lost like we have seen. There’s so much of backlash coming out of, you know, whether it’s charging PT or Gemini. I’m sure they started with a good intention that. I want to have a very diverse, inclusive thing, but diversity also means that you are including everybody you know, so you’re not also giving non accurate pictures of historical representations, because I think that is where I. Like we need a lot of work and that’s why there’s so much of backlash. It’s not a binary state. This is I want to highlight, is that like, I know the government is suing SpaceX and others for them not having, you know, immigrant workers. But again, that’s a very high end space. Where you need to, everything needs to be tight lipped so somebody who has worked at Federal Reserve Bank, I can totally understand that. So that’s why I want to highlight is that we live in a space where it is our continuous journey. So we should not feel like we have reached that journey or we have deployed the capital I am. Going to deploy 1 billion capital to DI Space, 1 billion capital to climate takes. But that’s where my accountability stops. No, you should go and check it out. What is the output? The output should not be what is happening with Jamie 91.5. Where there’s a complete misrepresentation of history. So I think we need to make sure we there’s a proper. Accountability of what you are doing. There is a meritocracy attached to it, and it’s a long process. It’s a long journey and it will take us a long time to reach there. 

 

Hessie Jones 

It will. It will. I mean, let let’s let’s just say that you live in the United States of America, which is a capitalistic. Country and there there is still very much the value to appeal to the shareholders, right and shareholders. You know what they care about. So it’s that balance that you talked about. And so for for me as someone who also invests in company but also. In in companies that early stage startups it it’s about the value that you bring. And when people say that whose values are attached to to that output, there needs to be a there needs to be one that actually represents humanity. That means they need to have a vote and then whether or not that that’s part of that vote is with the VC company or with the technology or the company who’s actually building the technology. It has to be there. So thank you so much for for providing your insights, because I think what you said today. Shows that there’s at least one company that’s thinking about all of this from a collective perspective. And and there needs to be. I think you need to influence a lot more of the VC community to think to think this way because yes, there is, there is the ROI behind it. But there is definitely a human aspect that, that, that is going to impact all of us. So thank you. Thank you. 

Gayatri Sarkar 

Once, say, before I go is that don’t take a binary approach to this. It’s not. So this is what I hear from this. The polarized binary approach. It will take a long time and it will take a lot of learn. And feedback. 

Hessie Jones 

Absolutely on that note. Thank you Gayatri for your time. I think there there is going to be a lot of hope. I Ihave a lot of hope in the technology that that is advancing today, but it’s going to be in lockstep with the critical oversight with the responsibility that comes with investment. And so that means this in that this sector actually has to evolve with the times. And I know that will happen. So thank you. So for our audience, if you have any topics that you want us to cover in the future like this one, please, please e-mail us at communications@altitudeaccelerator.ca. That’s all we have time for today. And I think again, my guest guy Teresa, our car in the meantime. Everyone have fun, have fun and stay safe. 

Host Information

Hessie Jones is an Author, Strategist, Investor and Data Privacy Practitioner, advocating for human-centred AI, education and the ethical distribution of AI in this era of transformation. 

She currently serves as the Innovations Manager at Altitude Accelerator. She provides the necessary support for Altitude Accelerator’s programs including Incubator and Investor Readiness. She will be the liaison among key stakeholders to provide operational support and ultimately drive founder success. 

LinkedIn

You can also listen to this podcast on Spotify.

Please subscribe to our weekly LinkedIn Live newsletters.

The post Evolving DEI within Venture Capital with Gayatri Sarkar of Advaita Capital appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>
Empowering Change: Shaping the Future of Venture Capital through Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/empowering-change-shaping-the-future-of-venture-capital-through-diversity-equity-and-inclusion/ Tue, 19 Mar 2024 15:15:41 +0000 https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/?p=134117 by Chhata Gupta In the rapidly advancing tech economy, a critical challenge persists with the underrepresentation of diverse voices within the venture capital (VC) ecosystem. This gap not only curtails… Continue reading Empowering Change: Shaping the Future of Venture Capital through Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

The post Empowering Change: Shaping the Future of Venture Capital through Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>
by Chhata Gupta

In the rapidly advancing tech economy, a critical challenge persists with the underrepresentation of diverse voices within the venture capital (VC) ecosystem. This gap not only curtails technological innovation but also overlooks a vast pool of innovation and diversity that is crucial for shaping an inclusive future. The evolution of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in venture capital is marked by progress, setbacks, and unyielding optimism for much-needed change.

Women and People of Colour in Venture Capital

The venture capital industry has long been criticized for its lack of diversity. Recent statistics shed light on the slow yet encouraging progress towards gender parity within the sector. According to a VC Human Capital Survey by Deloitte, as of 2022, women constituted 26% of the VC workforce, marking a significant increase from 15% in 2016. This growth, while noteworthy, barely scratches the surface of the entrenched systemic barriers that continue to stifle female talent and ambition. The fact that female entrepreneurs receive a fraction of total venture capital funding is a glaring testament to the economic and societal oversight plaguing the industry.  

In recent years, the venture capital (VC) industry has begun acknowledging the critical importance of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in driving innovation and economic growth. This acknowledgement has led to a modest increase in the presence of Black professionals in investment roles within the VC ecosystem. However, despite this progress, according to a report highlighted by Girlboss, the number of women of colour in the venture capital space is approximately 7%, while, Asian women make up 6%; and Black women, 1%, facing even more pronounced barriers to entry and success within the industry.

Silent Struggles and Systemic Barriers

Entrepreneurs like Stephanie Lipp — who is leading the charge at MycoFutures North Atlantic by creating sustainable mycelium (root system of fungi) leather—and Azar Azad epitomize the overlooked potential stifled by systemic barriers. Azad is the founder of AI VALI, a company that enhances diagnostic accuracy and efficiency through advanced AI technology for endoscopic and medical imaging. Their experiences not only exemplify the urgency for a paradigm shift in VC funding but also highlights the rich tapestry of innovation that is at risk of being marginalized.  

As per Lipp, “A lot of people just assume there’s equity, that there’s accessibility for all types of founders”, however, once she entered the startup world herself, she realized it was blatantly obvious the number of barriers that exist.   

Azad agreed and mentioned how “social groups that are supporting also get tricky when it comes to standing by a startup company”.     

Both realize the blurring lines in the funding decisions that affect startup founders like them. As per Lipp,  

“…it does make me nervous about how we’re going to move forward with a start-up that has a really long runway, a long time to revenue, even longer time to profitability. It’s really hard in the beginning to determine if our early stage is the reason for our struggles, or if an individual with a different background would have had the opportunity to secure funding at these initial, high-risk stages.”  

 

Bryan Duarte, founder of Black Tech Capital, and EIR at Altitude Accelerator is committed to diversity, continues to challenge the status quo, to ensure that Black and diverse tech entrepreneurs receive the recognition and funding they deserve. Emerging fund manager, Giselle Melo, also an EIR with Altitude Accelerator, and Managing Director of MATR Ventures is taking bold steps to champion underestimated founders. Melo brings her journey of overcoming adversity and her deep understanding of the systemic barriers facing underestimated founders to spearhead initiatives that level the playing field in venture capital. Her personal journey led her to found MATR Ventures: 

 

“… if anybody knows Kobe’s [Kobe Bryant] mindset around having a mamba mentality, these are founders that have likely spent their entire lives experiencing setbacks, but just ultimately decided that success is their only option. And so that’s the reason I started MATR Ventures. I was in their shoes, at one point, experiencing [these setbacks]. But you just decide that it is not the game that you’re here to play, you’re here to win. And I figured out a way, even though I didn’t get the capital and you have setbacks and people that will judge you before a word comes out of your mouth. And the numbers sometimes speak for themselves, but they don’t even get to that point. Because as you walk in the door, they’ve made their decision.” 

 

When discussing systemic obstacles, it’s worth noting the Kapor study highlighted a significant difference in how investors engage with founders based on their gender. The study found that male founders are often asked about growth and market opportunities, which are promotion-oriented questions. In contrast, female founders are more likely to be asked about potential risks, market fit, or loss prevention, which are prevention-oriented questions. Interestingly, those who are asked promotion-oriented questions, predominantly males, are six times more likely to secure funding than their female counterparts. How can we address and mitigate these inherent biases that currently favor males in an investment community that appears resistant to change? 

 

Duarte asserts that we need to be more deliberate. It starts with recognizing your own biases,  

“I recognize my own privilege. I recognize my privilege as a male. I recognize my privilege as growing up very much in white spaces. So, I’m going to use that privilege to try to break down those barriers and go in.” 

 He also points out that we need to scrutinize and challenge the numbers,  

 “In the Canada there are two key areas we need to focus on for change. The first is the Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC). They have recently released studies through Diversio that require anyone they invest in, or any funds they invest into, to disclose their diversity statistics. As a government organization, it’s crucial that we, the public, apply pressure to ensure these numbers are transparent and accessible. However, their recent reports are too generalized, particularly when it comes to minority groups. Instead of lumping all minority groups together, the data should be broken down to show specific numbers for Black, Indigenous, and Latino communities. This will give us a clearer picture of the actual representation. 

 

Duarte points we need to get down to the “nitty gritty numbers”.  Funds like Black Tech Capital, MATR Ventures are focused on overcoming these biases and will be the ones to challenge these numbers. He contends, “… it’s a process, it’s a long game, it’s not a short term. This is not going to change overnight.” 

Together, Duarte and Melo are not just fund managers, they are advocates for change, leveraging their personal experiences and leadership to dismantle longstanding barriers in venture capital funding towards a more equitable and innovative startup landscape.  

Challenging the "Pipeline Problem"

As both Melo and Duarte defy the “pipeline problem” narrative which assumes a scarcity of investable diverse founders, faces significant scrutiny and challenge. Both Melo and Duarte highlight that the actual impediment is not a lack of talented diverse founders but rather the restricted networks and systemic biases pervasive among those who control venture capital funds. These entrenched barriers often prevent a fair evaluation and recognition of diverse-led ventures, perpetuating a cycle of underrepresentation.   

As per Melo, “if people have decided there’s a pipeline problem it’s because they don’t have an interest or an intention at all to make that investment in women and underestimated founders”.  

Duarte agrees and adds, “there’s no lack of pipeline problem for me. My problem is that I have too many, right? I see a lot of overlooked, under-invested, underestimated founders that to me, are further along, and have more resilience, and more grit. So, instead, it’s a great investment opportunity”.   

Fund managers are now taking active steps to dismantle these barriers by broadening their investment scope and actively seeking out untapped potential within underrepresented communities. Through their efforts, both Mello and Duarte are not only revealing the fallacy of the “pipeline problem”, they are also demonstrating the immense innovation and opportunity that diverse founders bring to the table. This shift in approach is gradually changing the investment landscape, challenging the status quo, and promoting a more inclusive and equitable venture capital ecosystem.

The World Economic Forum highlights that addressing the VC gender gap transcends moral obligations, serving as a critical economic necessity. Venture Capital can tap into previously unexplored territories of innovation and growth. The systematic underinvestment in women and minority-owned businesses represents a significant economic shortfall and highlights a missed opportunity for economic and societal advancement.  

Gayatri Sarkar, of Advaita Capital Challenges Industry Norms

Gayatri Sarkar, the visionary behind Advaita Capital, stands as a pivotal figure challenging the norms of the traditionally white, male-dominated venture capital industry. With a background as a physicist, Sarkar’s transition to a leading figure in venture capital underscores the importance of diverse perspectives in driving technological advancement. At Advaita Capital, a woman-led, POC-led firm, the focus is on investing in transformative technologies such as generative AI and decarbonization solutions, highlighting the firm’s commitment to financial returns and societal impact. Advaita Capital invests in Series B or C companies, and is the only female-led, POC led growth stage venture capital company in the US. 

Sarkar’s philosophy extends beyond tokenism in diversity; it’s about redefining the criteria for excellence and inclusion in the VC world. She states, “It’s acceptable to acknowledge that their talent search fell short, particularly in identifying exceptional women. In contrast, my approach involves running a diverse firm where the entire team hails from prestigious educational backgrounds and possesses valuable experiences. I don’t need to explicitly target women or individuals of colour. Instead, I prioritize assembling a team of talented individuals, and it naturally includes women. Ideally, their response should have been more along the lines of admitting their shortcomings and expressing a commitment to finding additional exceptional talent. Claiming a lack of talent in their location isn’t the right answer”.   

Gayatri Sarkar’s journey and methodology in venture capital reflect a broader call for accountability and intentional action within the DEI space. By emphasizing talent and diversity as inherently linked, Sarkar’s leadership at Advaita Capital not only challenges but also inspires a new generation of venture capitalists to think beyond traditional paradigms and to recognize the value and necessity of diverse perspectives in shaping the future of technology and society.

Envisioning an Inclusive Future

Addressing the venture capital industry’s trillion-dollar blind spot is crucial for leveraging the untapped potential within diverse and underrepresented entrepreneurial sectors. This oversight represents not just a significant loss in economic value but also a missed opportunity for fostering innovation and inclusivity. The journey towards incorporating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) within venture capital, as per Sarker, emphasizes the importance of rethinking investment paradigms.   

In navigating this path, the venture capital community must confront and dismantle systemic barriers. By advocating for DEI, the industry can unlock a wealth of creativity and innovation, driving forward not just ethical progress but substantial economic gains. The gains are slow but these are noticeable changes. The collective push towards a more inclusive venture capital industry is about harnessing the full spectrum of human potential and creativity, essential for a stronger and more equitable future.   

Rectifying this blind spot within venture capital is not merely a journey of challenges but a path that is brimming with opportunities. Visionaries like Gayatri Sarkar, Bryan Duarte, Giselle Melo, alongside pioneers, Stephanie Lipp, Azar Azad, are leading the way towards a future where the venture capital industry is as diverse and vibrant as the world it seeks to innovate. As the sector evolves, the commitment to DEI will be pivotal in unlocking the full potential of diversity to drive sustainable growth and groundbreaking innovation, ensuring a more prosperous and equitable tomorrow.

Seeking to elevate your startup and carve out a strong personal brand? Altitude Accelerator is here to guide tech founders through its vast network of seasoned mentors and investors, pushing your venture to the forefront of innovation. Interested? We are now accepting applications for our Market Readiness and Investor Readiness Programs.

The post Empowering Change: Shaping the Future of Venture Capital through Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>
Building a Personal Brand as a Tech Leader https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/building-a-personal-brand-as-a-tech-leader/ Wed, 06 Mar 2024 20:21:56 +0000 https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/?p=134073 Transcript Hessie Jones So these days there has been this surge of people who are developing influence within their specific corner of the market. These are the digital craters who… Continue reading Building a Personal Brand as a Tech Leader

The post Building a Personal Brand as a Tech Leader appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>
Transcript

Hessie Jones

So these days there has been this surge of people who are developing influence within their specific corner of the market. These are the digital craters who specialize in a niche, and they begin to establish themselves as big experts in their field. There’s this rise of influence that these days has been less about celebrity, but now it’s also a strategic advantage for many entrepreneurs who want to build relation. Ships, but ultimately leverage their personal brand to build their business. Welcome to tech uncensored. Hi everyone. My name is Hessie Jones and here’s the scenario you’re building your business, you’re building your product, you’re getting some critical feedback, and now you’re you’re starting to get some traction, but you want to move faster. You want to start finding more customers? Get ready for potential investment, but you’re a small team and you have a very limited social media presence. So, but one thing you’re really good at is understanding. Let’s say the real estate industry, you’re a form of broker, and now you realize this sector needs major disruption. So, you’re passionate about solving this problem, but for the sake of your growth, you realize that to make a real impact, you need to establish yourself. As a thought leader within the real estate space, so how do you do it? Many startups don’t realize the value of establishing their own personal brands. With the rise of social media, there’s been this that there’s been a closing of this gap between. Between promotion and community and now there are endless opportunities to establish yourself as a tech leader that can help your company and yourself grow. So today I’m happy to speak to two founders who are doing just that and. Stephanie Clip, who is a Co founder and CEO of MyCo Futures North Atlantic and Staci LaToison, who is a founding partner of Dream Big Ventures. We’ll actually talk to them about what they’re doing, how they did it, understand the importance of authenticity, which is really, I guess. Important when it comes to defining your. Presence in social. Media and they’ll provide advice on how early stage founders can actually develop opportunities by building their personal brands and establishing themselves as tech leaders. So thank you, Stephanie and Stacy, for coming and talking to me about this today.

 

Stephanie Lipp

Thanks so much for having us. It’s always lovely to chat with you.

Hessie Jones

Absolutely. OK. So let’s start. Let’s start with Stephanie, because it’s probably easier to figure out how you got started by telling us a little bit about yourself and your company.

 

Stephanie Lipp

Sure. Yes. Stephanie Lipp, the CEO of MyCo Futures, I actually began my began my career in art and photography. I love fashion industry So I was a fashion photographer and worked with other brands. On their digital marketing, their branding and I really, really loved helping create a brand and doing visual communication because I think no matter how big your company is, the way you present yourself to the world is really valuable. But then I took a detour from the arts to manage nonprofit housing and that gave me a whole other lot of lessons about building a business and working with people. But it was really when my co-founder partner and I moved to Newfoundland to start a gourmet mushroom farm, which then pivoted into a startup, creating a next Gen. material made from my ceiling, which is the root system of fungi that we cultivate in vertical farm. That I really came back around to my roots in branding communications and I saw how useful that was to building my presence online. And then after the pandemic out in the real world.

 

Hessie Jones

So this came easy to you. It seems like is that that was.

 

Stephanie Lipp

That was the case.

 

Hessie Jones

Background. OK, Stacy, I’m going to turn to you. Tell us a little bit about yourself. You just seem to do so many things and obviously your presence has evolved online over time, so. Who are you and what do you do?

 

Staci LaToison

Oh, I have a lot of energy, so I I’m involved in several things that I’m really passionate about. I’m an award-winning investor, best selling author. I’m a consultant. I’m a podcast host of Her Money Moves podcast where I interview women. CEOs and influential business leaders who are making an impact on our economy and in our communities and I. Just all-aroundlove empowering women. I worked for Chevron for 22 years around the globe, managing billion dollar budgets and global teams. I was in China for five years. I was in Angola, Africa next that day or two and got to the point where it kind of during the pandemic. I decided that I’m going to put my fate in my own hands and decided that I was going to go out on my own and I’ve always had an entrepreneurial spirit. So it was time to give it a chance. Especially I’m a single mother and I’ve always told my children to go for their dreams. And I said, well, why am I not doing the same? So that’s how Dream Big Ventures was born. And you know, there’s a huge gap with equity and wealth and education on finances. You know, we don’t grow up talking about money. And so I’ve made it my mission to. Ensure that women are equipped with the tools because we make up half of the population and yet and so many facets, so many different industries, there is a huge gap. We’re not on boards, we’re not having equity, we’re not the CEO’s of Fortune 500 companies. I mean it’s just. Really ridiculous. So it’s time to make a change and takes people take action. And make bold moves if. We’re ever going to move the needle.

 

Hessie Jones

Exactly. And you just actually highlight something important because when I talk about people having specific expertise or or even I know something to say within a specific topic area, I think for both of you it’s important. This whole idea of equity, especially in the tech space and. And I think you both have loud critical voices when it comes to this lack of equity and how we can get it. So you know, I think we could talk about that a little bit later and how that actually moved the needle for both of you. But let me ask something really basic for both of you. First of all, what? Social platforms. Are you on Stephanie?

 

Stephanie Lipp

LinkedIn is my biggest one right now, and we have an Instagram that we’re going to be revamping this year.

 

Hessie Jones

And Staci?

 

Staci LaToison

I’m on LinkedIn, I’m on Instagram and I think the Instagram automatically updates on Facebook, but I’m also our podcast is on YouTube, Apple, Spotify. It’s on all the major platforms.

 

Hessie Jones

And do you two track the growth? Of your followers on your, on your respective channel steps.

 

Stephanie Lipp

Yes. Yeah, this year was it was one of the biggest jumps in, in followers and connections and and just a wide range of people. So it was really exciting to see all the different people that you know want to connect with me and the startup as well.

 

Hessie Jones

And Stephanie? Oh, sorry, Staci.

 

Staci LaToison

Yes, same here. It’s really important to track your analytics to know who is your community, who’s the audience that most resonates with you. So yeah, most of my community, it’s women between the ages of like 25 and 55. You know who are really thirsty for. For information. Who want to learn and continue to grow in their careers and in their personal journeys?

 

Hessie Jones

OK, so let’s, let’s, let’s start with you first, Stacy, because you’re, you’re doing this amazing job and in giving women the tools for this information, you’re a community builder. Your strategist, what was the moment that you actually thought that this is something that you wanted to do? Or was it? Was it something that just kind of happened? And leveraging your brand building, building it the way you have.

 

Staci LaToison

Yeah. So I have always, always been an advocate for equality. Since I was a little girl. I was always very independent and I think I had attended a conference during the pandemic and Serena Williams was a keynote speaker and that’s when I first learned that only 2% of VC funds go to women and underrepresented founders. So I mean, that was definite igniter for me to, you know, to do something about it, I figure. Well, I have thetoolso to do this. And more of us women need to, but also. I also attended a conference outside of my company, so I mean, you’re talking 22 years with a pension. I never even went to many career Expos externally because we do everything internally. And I saw that there was a Puerto Rican woman who was vice president at Pepsi. And it just like wow, really touched me because I had never seen that. And I still haven’t seen that to this day in oil and gas. Never ever was there a Latino woman who was at the. Top and in the C-Suite. And so, that made me realize there’s many others like me who are not seeing it. And so if you see me a lot on social media, it’s because I want to make sure that there is representation. So that others who are, you know, at these conferences and who are. You know, working in the corporations know that it is possible. You can do it too. So even though it might not look like it. Because you don’t. See that every day. But we are more than capable and anything is possible.

 

Hessie Jones

Thank you. So, Stephanie, I see you a lot also on LinkedIn and a lot of the stories that you tell like to me that there there’s a humbling effect that you have when you actually post the stuff that you do especially especially as. A biotech founder, you know? And in the clean tech space, where it’s incredibly hard. So did this come easy to you? Do it like I I understand that you you learn communications and you have been doing this before, but to actually leverage it for yourself. How how hard was that?

 

Stephanie Lipp

Yeah, it definitely wasn’t as easy to do it for myself. I always love to champion others, and I can always, you know, pick out the things that I want to share about other companies or people. But then I realize, oh, gosh, now I really have to do it for myself. And it wasn’t really until late 2021 when I won my first pitch competition, the 1st when I. Or did a couple weeks later I opened LinkedIn. There was so many connections and messages and people had shared things and I was like, oh, it just didn’t occur to me that anyone. Would you know care that much? It was. It was big for me, but I forgot how how much of A community there was out there and and I really realized that people actually like to support others. And so I wanted to. Be part of that. And it was just great that I could connect with a lot of different types of people from investors, ecosystem partners, other founders. That’s been a really great way to connect. And on the other side of that, as well as an early stage founder and startup, there’s a lot of value and pressure on making progress because that’s. A way to signal to investors and people that support you that you’re working hard, you’re making things happen and and so that was a great way to highlight. Like that? Yeah. It was a place to accumulate all my business activity and even just for myself to show that how far we’ve come. Sometimes it feels like we’re moving at a glacial pace, especially given the the conditions of the last year. But then I can look back. Or sometimes someone will like something for way back. I’m like, oh, yeah, we did that. And it just is. It’s a nice reminder that Rama was making progress and that there’s people out there who are cheering, so I always appreciate when Hussey. When you say, oh, I saw you do this and this because it reminds me that, yeah, there’s value in taking the time to to share the little wins and also, you know, talking about equality and representation. I never saw anyone that looked like me, you know, out there doing biotech, running company. And so if there’s someone else that happens along my my profile maybe. I look like them. They can resonate with me in some way and and. See that there’s all kinds of people that make a CEO. It’s not what we’ve just seen growing up. There’s like, yeah, so there’s possibility out there.

 

Hessie Jones

OK, now Staci has this become overtime. I think you guys both of you are starting to see a little bit of traction in in you actually just being out there and saying the things that you do and it is resonating with people. Are you starting or have you developed an actual strategy now to make this? Intentionally a channel that actually performs for you for your business, for your community.

 

Staci LaToison

Yes, I pretty much highlight what I’m going to post a little ahead of time, depending on what events are planned where I’m speaking, but it has helped to develop that thought leadership and as a result I’ve been reached, you know, reached out for speaking for judging pitch competitions. Co investments, you know, a little bit of everything. So, and mentorship.

 

Hessie Jones

But when you’re, so when you’re in, let’s say conferences and this goes to both of you. You know, everybody has to take a selfie or they have to. They take pictures and they say, oh, this is a great speaker, this is this is someone who’s doing something amazing, whatever. But sometimes it’s forced in a way because they have it’s almost like I’m at this conference. I hear some people that that that resonate with me is there. Can you balance out the need to actually post as opposed to, How do you know when? When it is a good post to post. You know what I mean? Let’s start with Stephanie. Do you understand my question?

 

Stephanie Lipp

Yeah. No, that’s a that’s a really good question because I mean especially my background photographer, the lesson I tend to do is ask anyone to take a photo of them or take a picture with me. It’s just, I don’t know, just weird. So I tried to. And I also like to have a variety of things. So I’ll take a picture, someone on stage or a poster, just to have a. Of of content. Because I think sometimes. Yeah, with the selfie it’s it’s great and interesting, but if you’re just have a whole carousel of these pictures, it it kind of almost becomes about you and it’s it’s about you know name dropping in a way that oh, I met this person, this person. But if you can actually you know take a variety of pictures kind of set the scene and and then that’s I guess it’s about bringing value to whoever is reading the post so that they can feel like they were there and they were. In it, rather than just seeing seeing you in a bunch of selfies because you know they’re hardly ever flattered. And then you don’t really get a sense of what the event was. So I think that’s why I kind of.

 

Hessie Jones

Thank you, Stacy. What about you?

 

Stephanie Lipp

Yes. Similarly, I’m very intentional with the messaging, you know, want to always empower and inspire. And for those who were unable to be there, maybe they couldn’t pay for that $500 ticket for that conference. They could feel like they were there and they could experience and get all the key takeaways. And bring that you know, back to them without having to, you know, pay that pricey ticket.

 

Hessie Jones

Well, so you also have a podcast I want to learn more about the podcast like. When did that start? And why and why did that start?

 

Staci LaToison

Yeah. So this is a groundbreaking podcast. I interview women across all industries who are CEO’s and influential business leaders. And, you know, oftentimes they are not the ones who are sought after for some of these major conferences. So I mean. That have all of this experience. They are like amazing outstanding powerhouses and. And so I just love being able to highlight them. There is no other podcast out there like this, for example. I interviewed a best selling. Author Liz Elting of Dream Big and Win, and I’ve seen her. Speak at a you know a different event, but they’ve really resonated with me since my company is called Dream Big Ventures. And I just. I asked her if she would be on the podcast and she said yes so, so, so exciting. And she sold her business for a billion dollars. So this show is all about providing tips and strategies. Or entrepreneurs for corporate professionals. For, you know, all women to be able to succeed in business and to learn more like it’s a safe space for because my guests are often they’re vulnerable and they tell like they’re they’re real, authentic stories because it’s not. Easy, getting to the top, you know, it is such a challenge, and a lot of times people only see the end. They don’t understand everything that you had to go through to get there and so on the show, they share all of the hard times and the hurdles. But also offer a lot of great advice and strategies so that others can succeed. So this show is about uplifting other women.

 

Hessie Jones

And it’s been resonating obviously with your audience.

 

Staci LaToison

Yes, yes. I mean, I’ve got VC’s who are GP’s that have raised $100 million funds to founders who are unicorns to, you know, women who started their own film and film studios. To you, I mean it across the board. A A woman who’s a Columbia law professor who is a huge advocate and investor in Women’s Health. So I mean, I. It’s just so exciting for me every single time I sit down with these women and interview them and, you know, learn about their stories. And I personally learn so much. And I know that the audience will, too. And they do.

 

Hessie Jones

So you said something that was really important. I want to turn this to Stephanie and you talked about authenticity and and so from Stephanie from your perspective, I mean this is this is almost like I would say the Holy Grail of social media, if you’re going to get people to connect with you in a way that. It’s not only profound, but from a relationship perspective, but also eventually, to help you build important connections. Tell me about how this has made a difference for you.

 

Stephanie Lipp

Oh yeah, this is. It’s been really, really great to build my presence online and yet again, as I mentioned bringing into in real life, you know, talking about clean tech and biotech and then you know, that really spilling over into the fashion side and being a female founder has brought me some really amazing opportunities to speak on panels. It’s a wide range of. Events you know on LinkedIn, you have time to make a draft and craft this message. But when you’re in a room with people and you know your your adrenaline’s going it, it’s a a really big challenge. So that’s something really been able to hone with these different experiences and it’s really brought me to the point of talking about the intersection of clean tech, our technology and solution in the fashion industry, which is exactly where my passion. Is and why? You know I’ve dedicated so much to to bringing this solution. Market. So it went from my first panel that was ever invited to was from the New York, Newfoundland Young Farmers Forum, which was in a small hotel in Gander, NL, talking to a room of, yeah, farmers who work really, really hard. So I was like, why, why am I selected to do this? You know, always with the a bit of imposter syndrome. But just last autumn, I was invited to speak at Elevate. Conference on the stage and then an event at Holt Renfrew for the H project anniversary. In the same week, so it just shows that I was just blown away that anyone want me to speak about farming in Newfoundland and then, you know, getting. These amazing panels in Toronto has been really cool to to see that progression.

 

Hessie Jones

So what do you think that is like when, when, when people see you like what? What do you think is the thing about Stephanie that wants people? What that that makes some of these organizations? Want to hear more or have or put you on stage to actually tell your story?

 

Stephanie Lipp

On the one hand, I hope it’s it’s positivity I by no means mean I believe in toxic positivity. I don’t sugarcoat things, but at the same time, I always remind myself it’s such an immense privilege to be able to pursue this. Fashion. Lots of people have to make choices with their lives and careers for survival. And so for me to be able to take this very untraveled path is is, is always a privilege. And so I always have to show gratitude along with any of the challenges. And I also try to be the type of person who always shows up, who’s prepared who, you know. Adds value and so that whenever someone puts my name out there, they can be confident that I’m going to perform and a little bit of a people pleaser, so I never want anyone to to, you know, not feel that I. I contributed to to whatever is going and they’re always for great reasons and purposes. And again, being someone up on the stage representing someone they haven’t seen before, I. Think that’s that’s. Always part of it. That’s really important and I do appreciate all the people giving me opportunities, not just because, you know, a founder of color because I’m a woman, but. I think it’s still. Acknowledge that there’s there’s a still a gap in the diversity of representation.

 

Hessie Jones

Yeah, I think that you know the one thing that I’m starting to realize is that there’s a lot of strength and vulnerability. And those who put themselves out there in ways that you know, it it it is hard, it’s hard to be able, as you say to, to tell the good, the bad and the ugly. But those are the things that resonate with people. So, Stacy, what about you, To be social. Naturally comes easier than doesfor for other people. For those people, for those founders just starting out right and who don’t come from the kind of background that both of you do, what do you say to them? Like, what? What kind of pieces of advice would you give them to? If they’re just.

 

Staci LaToison

Well, I think first of all, you don’t ever grow unless you step out of your comfort zone. So why not give it a try and you could do it your way. You know, even if you are more of an introvert, you don’t necessarily have to at least be in the forefront. You could put your product in the forefront. You could know what is some of those emoji and what do you call, you know, Jeff, that are funny, you know, and different. You know charts, I think female quotient does a lot of that where they don’t necessarily see, I don’t even know who the CEO is, but you always see them put different animations and different graphics. So yeah, you could do it your way and just be creative and to reach audiences. Also wanted to share that. One of the best compliments I’ve ever received was someone telling me Stacy, you’re a master in authenticity. You know. I am proud, you know, to to share that. No, my journey was not like the the spoon wasn’t silver spoon wasn’t, you know, handed to me. I was a teenage mother at 17. And you know, nobody would ever know that. But, I mean, I share it. Like and then I’ve had other women. It was like I the same thing happened to me. And they’ll come up afterwards and give me a hug. And like, just thank you for sharing that because looking at you and never would have never would have known. And then I I have one testimonial where she said, Oh my God, Stacy, I saw you speak in LA last year and, you know, I was so excited to see you and tell you and give you an update on what’s been going on in my life, she said. You know, based on what you said, I took action and I left that job, and now I’m making 50% more and I just bought my first home for my baby. I mean that is powerful. And so I feel like I am doing exactly what I’m. Supposed to be. Doing and living out my purpose in life to help others, and that’s something that when I was working my corporate job, I didn’t have that kind of reach. Yeah.

 

Hessie Jones

To keep going on that theme because Stephanie, can you tell me maybe some stories? Of people that you’ve met along the way where you’ve impacted them much like what Staci was talking about, how has your journey made an impact on on people as they start to progress?

 

Staci LaToison

Sure. Yeah, there’s this one really favorable moment in Elevate conference last autumn where this young woman came up to me, like, very gingerly. She’s like, hi, I was like, hi, how are you? And she’s like, are you Stephanie? I’m like, yes. She’s like, oh my gosh, I am so excited to meet you. I follow like that. I was just like, I could not believe this. This was just so she was so sweet and sincere. And I literally could not fathom it. Anyway, who I was out on like the Internet. And she was excited to see her purse, our prototype, talk to me. And that was like, a really good reminder that you really don’t know who’s out there. And if I. And, you know, make someone excited about material science and clean tech, and being, you know, a woman and running a company that was just really cool and sweet and so and. And yeah, people are constantly like, oh, I saw you on this and that and it’s. Yeah, it’s humbling and exciting that there is a wider world out there. Inside of my little bubble of clean tech and and the, you know, fundraising blows where it’s always positive, no one’s come up to me and said anything negative about what I do. They’re just happy to support. And I think that’s one of the nicest things about, yeah, the the community that I found and the people that follow is that they’re so incredibly supportive. You everyone can be united in trying to make the planet better and and preserve it for future generations. So I think there’s really powerful energy in that where, you know, there’s lots of great innovations. I think particularly in in clean tech. Yeah, everyone, it’s like really uniting and and positive.

 

Hessie Jones

I agree. I agree with that. I mean, I think with clean tech is because it’s one of the hardest sectors to actually evolve because it has to go through testing. It must go through validation that it’s not a SAS product you can put in the market within a year. It has to work right and. You know your purses. They have to be rock solid and you can’t have anything falling out of those purses, right? Especially if you’re developing an alternative material. So kudos to you for, for, for doing that. And I think the important thing for founders. Is that when you relay your stories, you know it’s important that you’re you’re telling, you’re telling, you know, the hard truth of being an entrepreneur. And I think for both of you, I think that that that’s very important. So for like Stacy, would you say there are challenges? With being with putting yourself out there. The way you do, whether or not it you know, is it is it a constraint on you? Is it a constraint on your your business? Is it is it? Is there weakness in being too authentic?

 

Staci LaToison

I don’t think there is. If anything, I think. It builds trust. With the community, because you’re being genuine and. No, I don’t think that. There’s, I haven’t seen any disadvantages yet, but are there? And what about? What about just?

 

Hessie Jones

With respect to time and effort. Because this is now integrated into your business, you have to do this every day. You have to continue to build a presence. It’s not like it’s probably equivalent to, let’s say, buying ads every day, but this time it’s really just about making sure that Stacy has to get out there specific time, every day or every other day. Etcetera. And so it it has to be baked into the stuff that you do, is that right?

 

Staci LaToison

Know what my biggest challenge? My biggest challenge is raising capital. And my other big challenge is, yeah, it’s time when when I talk about time, it’s more like because when you have meetings and then then the follow up. So but this part of it I I don’t think is. That challenging?

 

Hessie Jones

It’s the fun part, right? Yeah. So, how can you like, what? What kind of impact has this had? Do you think overall, let’s say now you say you you need to raise money, the connections that you’ve made to get to that specific goal, how has that impacted it?

 

Staci LaToison

Now there’s where I do see that there’s an advantage because of building. I mean, I have built a brand and a professional reputation for dream big ventures and for her money moves. And for Stacey Littleton, so. So yeah, people can go out and and they see what I’m doing. And oftentimes people in the community are like, Stacy, I see you’re killing it. We’re so proud of you. You know, what can I do to help and support you? And they want to partner with you. So you know, there’s been a lot of benefits from it.

 

Hessie Jones

So if I were to ask both of you if you were to Google your name today. Versus let’s say 10 years ago, what would? What would Google say about who is Stephanie versus who is Stacy? So I’ll start with Stephanie.

 

Stephanie Lipp

Sure. Yeah. I don’t think I had much of AA footprint 10 years ago or even three years ago. It was really in the last, yeah, 2-3 years that I started going out there actually told something. I’m like, I’m not. I’m not anonymous anymore. People can definitely Google me and they know exactly what I do, which is fine. I’m always proud about that. But yeah, there’s. I’ve had so many opportunities to speak and be interviewed. So I think it’s it’s cool that I have a footprint out there now, and no matter what happens, at least for this time in the Internet history, I could say that I was doing something and I was going for it and and and again, knowing that I do try to always, yeah, interject my values and and what is really important to me in terms of representation. Responsible consumption production to those things. So it’s it’s really consistent and I think that’s important in general to have that distance the online versus in person, you wouldn’t want me to talk a certain way in, in my post. And then you meet me and then I’m not really as pleasant that’s that’s not a nice surprise. You try to avoid surprise like that. So yeah, remembering what what people will read out there and then. Remembering to to carry that on into in my day-to-day actions and behavior.

 

Staci LaToison

Yeah, I don’t think I didn’t even create a LinkedIn account until maybe two years ago. So, yeah, 10 years ago I was in China, living my best life as an expat with Chevron and had no idea that I would be an entrepreneur one day, but definitely now when you look me up, I mean, you’ll see the podcast episodes. You’ll see me speaking at the rice women and Leadership Conference. You’ll see that I’ve won some awards. You’ll see the book. So you have made a lot of progress and a lot of momentum in the the last two years.

 

Hessie Jones

So if I were to ask both of you because it still feels like you both have a certain amount of advantage over a lot of startup founders. OK, so we have a startup founder who who’s building something, but they absolutely have like 0 social media presence. Maybe except for GitHub, let’s just say. All the developers know that person. What are some, let’s say no brainers to get them started? Like how? How do they start doing this on LinkedIn, especially among a community where they’re they’re trying to find out, get more customers or potentially find investment? Stephanie.

 

Stephanie Lipp

The two things I was thinking about are one that no one is too small, so don’t let your impostor syndrome in the way, which is easier said than done. But if. If you. Just participate in an event even if you didn’t win right about it. If you even read an article that’s a win for your your industry, that’s something to share. But to go along with that, which is the the key part is to reciprocate so. You know, liking, commenting and sharing in other peoples wins, however big or small, is really important because it means just as much to them as it does to you. When people do that for you and it just shows to everyone that you’re showing up for others, and I think that’s a really nice way to show that you’re committed because. It’s easy just to take all the likes and the shares, but to to to put it back out there in the world, I think will will really show on a human level and on a thought leadership level that you’re you’re in it for the right reasons and that you’re someone that other people want to amplify. And then those small wins will definitely turn into medium sized wins to bigger wins and huge. And then you’ll you’ll bring people along that journey with you. And I think at the beginning. Yeah, it really seems like, oh, just one, one thing people are gonna come. They just. I just one little pitch competition. But then, you know, in a couple of months it’ll be the second pitch competition. Then an article and and they’ll snowball that way. And as long as you’ve cultivated the the simple things like liking and commenting and sharing at the beginning you’re going to you know see that. Come back to.

 

Hessie Jones

You OK, Stacy?

 

Staci LaToison

Yes, I don’t know that I have much to add from Stephanie’s response.

 

Hessie Jones

But on the but on social media, so for let me see. I’m just trying to think, oh, maybe maybe the the question is where do you draw the line between between being someone who’s authentic, who’s sharing things and then being, let’s say, a spammer. Because some people can do it. Really some people can be really good at putting stuff out there all the time, but then for somebody that’s just starting out and they’re putting out. Content they they’re trying to get to the right audience and but they don’t want to be annoying. They don’t know the definition of authentic yet. Right? Because like I said, it comes easier to some people than others. How did they? How did they find that for social media post?

 

Stacie LaToison

Yeah, I think if you read a really great book, you know you could do a book review and share that. You could, you know, that’s relative to your industry and to what your to your company, you could, let’s say you attended a conference and maybe highlight some speakers. That really resonated with you and in your industry. Umm. Maybe you host kind of a webinar like what we’re doing. You know, it’s a good way to to highlight your product and and your business. That’s actually that’s a good thing in a way. I was just thinking about that because.

 

Hessie Jones

If you don’t. Know how to do social media as well. Then do something like a podcast where you’re the one asking questions and the experts are the ones giving their opinions, and so vicariously what you’re doing is you’re creating the content for those, for, for yourself, in a way, because you’re the one that needs a lot of those answers, right? So I mean it’s hard. And I completely get it and that these are the questions, the questions I’m asking you are the questions that many founders are asking me because they it’s it’s not easy for them and they don’t want to buy ads. They want to be relevant. They want to start connecting with the right audiences, but they don’t know how. So OK, so any closing thoughts for either of you, Staci, I’ll start with you.

 

Staci LaToison

Yeah, I mean, do your research, if there’s certain people that you follow and you really like what they’re doing, don’t be afraid to even reach out to them. And maybe that’s they can be your first interview. I am. And yeah, don’t feel like. Your you know, just don’t be afraid to put yourself out there and say, I mean, especially if you want your businesses to succeed, then it’s kind of part of the it’s part of it. You know, if you look. At a lot of very successful businesses, I mean. They have commercials, they have their name out there in the public. So especially if you’re going to be the CEO of this company and you’re representing it, then you’re going to have to learn how to get. Comfortable doing that, Stephanie?

 

Stephanie Lipp

I would say be as willing to take advice as you feel like you’re in a place to give it, and on the flip side, be as willing to give help as much as you’re willing to ask for it. Definitely be kind and show gratitude because that will show that will shine through anything that you do and. And I always ask how you’re bringing value, because I think that intent to bring other people value is how, again, you’ll get that returned many times over just by having it putting a good intent out there. Into the world.

 

Hessie Jones

Very nice. Thank you that that’s on that note. That’s all we have time for today and I thank you so much, Stephanie and and Staci for joining me. I know that I know I was grilling you, but I I’m thinking there must be an easy way for to be by who you two are. And I think there are a lot of people who continue to struggle. But I think the advice you gave today is great because now now founders who are just starting out will have at least some basic tools. And I would say be natural. Get out there and just try. Right. Nobody’s going to slam you for trying, and you’ll get better every day. That’s what I believe, anyway. So thank you both for coming for our audience. If you have topics, you want us to cover, please e-mail us at communications@altitudeaccelerator.ca and until next time, everyone please have fun and stay safe.

Host Information
Hessie Jones

Hessie Jones is an Author, Strategist, Investor and Data Privacy Practitioner, advocating for human-centred AI, education and the ethical distribution of AI in this era of transformation. 

She currently serves as the Innovations Manager at Altitude Accelerator. She provides the necessary support for Altitude Accelerator’s programs including Incubator and Investor Readiness. She will be the liaison among key stakeholders to provide operational support and ultimately drive founder success. 

LinkedIn

You can also listen to this podcast on Spotify.

Please subscribe to our weekly LinkedIn Live newsletters.

The post Building a Personal Brand as a Tech Leader appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>
Startup Resilience Navigating Relationships for Early-Stage Founders https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/startup-resilience-navigating-relationships-for-early-stage-founders/ Tue, 27 Feb 2024 16:34:48 +0000 https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/?p=133939 Growth Hackers determined that the greatest indicator of startup success is resilience: “You might feel that things are moving slow in your company – that is natural. You may make… Continue reading Startup Resilience Navigating Relationships for Early-Stage Founders

The post Startup Resilience Navigating Relationships for Early-Stage Founders appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>

Growth Hackers determined that the greatest indicator of startup success is resilience:

“You might feel that things are moving slow in your company – that is natural. You may make decisions, that, in retrospect may lead to undesired consequences, or perceived setbacks in your goal to reach critical milestones. If you are an entrepreneur building a brand new startup, you probably have trouble seeing any light at the end of the tunnel from time to time.”

It’s how far startup success is defined by how far an entrepreneur is willing to go and wait to see its startup succeed.

One often overlooked reality about startups is that launching and sustaining one is not as straightforward as successful entrepreneurs might lead you to believe. Even with the current resources available to aid the growth and development of startups, persistent challenges remain. As a budding startup entrepreneur, be prepared to navigate numerous obstacles and endure difficulties.

Startups face many challenges in their journey to scale.  An entrepreneur’s ability to effectively manage these issues as they surface is a sign of your character as you grow.

Many of these challenges are dependent on the relationships you create and cultivate along the way. What stories never get told are the failures that transpire because of these relationships. They could come from opportunistic clients unwilling to pay for services rendered, or from toxic employees or cofounders. They could come from once-enthusiastic partners willing to drive more value through their own relationships, but ultimately default on this promise. For many founders, these failures are hard lessons they take to the new set of relationships they encounter.

  • Developing the right team
  • Finding the right partners and vendors
  • Selecting the right VC
  • Personally as a CEO, determining your limitations and making the decisions you think are right for the company, in those moments

We were excited to host Devin Ramphal, Sector Manager for Innovation and Technology at the City of Brampton’s Economic Development Office and formerly CEO/Cofounder of Clean AIR which was acquired in 2023 and Jennifer Cameron, Co-founder and CEO of INVRS and formerly the founder of hyperWALLET, which was acquired by PayPal in 2018 for $400 million USD.

Both had important stories as founders who have navigated relationships in their startup journeys and provided some great insight from their own experiences to help founders build resilience.

Transcript

Hessie Jones

Hi everyone we’re talking navigating relationships for early stage founders and I read this article a few days ago on growth hackers that determined that the greatest indicator of startup success is resilience. They say you might feel that things are moving slowly in your company and that’s totally natural. You actually may make decisions that, in retrospect, may actually lead to some undesired consequences or perceived setbacks in the goals that you’re trying to reach. If you are an entrepreneur that is building a brand new startup, you probably have trouble seeing any light at the end of the tunnel. From time to time. So it’s how far startup success is defined by how far an entrepreneur is actually willing to go and wait to see its startup succeed. Hi everyone. My name is Jesse Jones and I’m and welcome to Tech Uncensored one often overlooked reality about startups is is that launching and sustaining a startup is not as straightforward as any successful entrepreneur might lead you to believe. Even with all the current resources that are available. Through accelerators like altitude or through investor funding. There are persistent challenges that that always remain. And as a budding startup entrepreneur, you have to be prepared to navigate a lot of those obstacles and endure a lot of those difficulties. Many startups face challenges in their journey to actually scale and your ability to actually manage a lot of these. Issues as they surface is a sign of your character as you actually grow and develop as an entrepreneur and as a CEO. Lot of these challenges are mainly dependent on the relationships you cultivate and you create along the way and what stories I find that never get told are that failures that transpire. Because of these relationships, they could. The from opportunistic clients who are unwilling to pay for their services rendered or you may find that once you’re developing your team, there will be that one toxic co-founder or employee that you end up hiring there. They they could be partners. Or people in your network who are willing to drive enormous value through their own networks to help you succeed. But they ultimately default on their promise. So for many found. These failures are hard lessons they take to a new set of relationships that they encounter, whether or not they develop a new team, whether or not they find the right partners or vendors, and even when they select the VC. But even you personally, as a CEO. It’s determining your limitations and making the right decisions that you think are right for the company in that moment. So today, I’m excited to welcome a few people who are going to talk about this topic with me. Devin Ramphal, who is the sector manager for Innovation and technology at the City of Brampton’s Economic Development Office and former CEO and Co founder of Clean Air. Which was acquired last year, 2023. I’m also pleased to welcome Jennifer Cameron, who is the Co founder and CEO of Inverse and formerly the founder of Hyper Wallet, which was acquired by PayPal in 2018 for 400 million. Both have some really important stories as founders who have navigated relationships in their startup journeys, and they’re going to provide some amazing insights from their own experience to help founders build resilience. So welcome, Devin and Jennifer.

Jennifer Cameron

Thank you, Hessie.

 

Hessie Jones

OK, so let’s start from the beginning when for both of you and I’ll start with Devin, tell us, tell me about your early startup experience. You developed this amazing idea. You want to see it grow. What made you become an entrepreneur?

 

Devin Ramphal

Yeah. Good question, Hessie. Thank you. I think in the beginning, the first real entrepreneurial journey I had was after university, right? So it was actually a totally different company. It was in clean air. dot AI was a. Company called DRAM. Innovations where we invented a fuel nozzle that doesn’t drip when you pump gas at the gas station, so you know you pump gas. And now you take your nozzle out. It drips all over the floor. That was the first venture that was featured on the CBC’s Dragons den. That was a special energy innovation episode. Our technology actually came second place across the entire country for sustainable innovation. Unfortunately, 2nd place didn’t get anything from Dragon so we but we got a lot of publicity and within a month our company was like like hurled into this media frenzy and people were emailing us from all over the world. We had, you know, six weeks to put a business together and A and a website together and manage all of these inquiries which was really. Cool. So that was the first venture. We took that pretty far. We have a patent for it. We have we received an offer to purchase the technology a few years ago from one of the largest OEM’s in the market. So we didn’t take the offer at the time. We didn’t feel the offer reflected the value, but that was that was venture #1. And then we kind of morphed into venture #2, which was clean air dot AI, but really to answer your question why it started off, it sounds kind of cliche to say, but it sounded it. It started off almost like altruistic. Like we wanted to help make the world a better place, right, with like. With, you know, stopping these unnecessary drops and saving gasoline when you look at it on a grand scale, it was 300 million liters of fuel every year around the world that was being wasted. But really at the crux of it. A feeling entrepreneurship. It’s just it’s it’s internal and it’s a drive to to do something bigger and kind of leave a legacy, right? Something that will last, you know, beyond beyond you as a person. Right. Like when when I’m gone from this planet, you know what’s what’s what’s remaining? I think for me, that’s that’s really what it is. It’s just leaving something behind. So yeah, I don’t know. That’s that’s why it’s morph. I don’t think it’s altruistic anymore by any means, but that’s kind of how we started being fresh out of school and out of university.

 

Hessie Jones

So thanks. Thanks, Devin. Jennifer, what was your catalyst?


Jennifer Cameron

I don’t think my catalyst, like Devin, said there is an altruistic element to it. When I look at both Hyper Wallet and inverse, I know that I have an underlying passion and belief. And prosperity with hyperwallet making. The ability for people to transact easier was a motivator and to to to stimulate. Business growth was a motivator, and with INVRS, there’s a desire to see sort of wealth unleashed. I mean, if people learn how to invest properly from an early age, that has tremendous consequences of how you know, like a generation of people who grow up being far richer than anyone ever. Else has been, so there is an an altruistic element absolutely for sure, and as far as the legacy absolutely, I’m definitely motivated by successful outcomes and. You know making value, but when my true motivator, the thing that really gets me going is. I really like to be creative. I really like to see an idea come to fruition and just as importantly for people to enjoy it and like it so. Sometimes I say. I’m an artist. This is when I’m being a little bit silly, but sometimes I say I’m an artist and entrepreneurship is my canvas, but I know it’s a little bit silly, but that is sort of how I feel very passionate about creation.

 

Hessie Jones

Yeah, yeah. You’re the type of people that live. That draw outside of the boxes, right, you you would like to think out-of-the-box. You don’t want to be constrained, correct?

 

Devin Ramphal

Jen gave me a thought as. Well, I think. That those are really, really good words, Jen. For what? What? That made me think about is one word which is building right. Like, for me, it’s what gets me excited, is building something. Right? So. And, you know, in Brampton, we’re building this Brampton Innovation district. And in the tech startup, you’re building a cool technology and and and new market need for it. So I think really. To add to what I said before, the crux of it for me is building something.

 

Hessie Jones

So so, Devin, you started your company with your friends and this is a commitment that you all decided this is what we’re going to do. We’re going to be here for a while. So now your friends become your business partners and your Co founders. What was that transition like? For you.

 

Devin Ramphal

It was. It was a long transition. So we actually stayed in business for almost a decade and give or take, you know, so some people came and some people left, and then they came back. So but for the more or less it was about a decade of of, of, of, of Friendship and business together. The transition was, was it. It was easy. In the beginning and it got harder as the business grew and got more serious and especially when you bring in other stakeholders, investors, customers, it could be VC’s. It could be, you know, family and friends or angels, it doesn’t matter. But when when you had others. With expectations and that’s when. I would say friction started could build with your friends, right? So that’s when that’s when things really started to transition and started to change. But in in the beginning, when you’re still developing your product you you know you don’t have many customers yet. You don’t have many investors you know on your board of directors. It’s just your group of friends and maybe some family members. It’s I don’t want to say it’s a funny games, but it’s a lot. It’s a lot smoother, right? But again, these external stakeholders when they come in, things get a lot more serious and that’s when friction would start to.

Hessie Jones

So we’ll get into the external stakeholders then in the future question. But Jen, I wanted to to ask your experience. You raised, you raised money in two economically difficult time periods. So in the early 2000s with Hyper Wallet and now in 2020. We were, we were seeing high interest rates. What was similar and? What was different between the two and what happened in the the early odds that help you navigate what’s happening today?

 

Jennifer Cameron

Right. So. I guess you could say that we had the misfortune of starting hyperwallet justasthe.com bust was starting. I remember BC saying to us when we were at fundraising, he said there was a cold wind blowing up from San Francisco and then, you know, it really did hit. So I mean that was, you know that was like 2 decades ago, but it was. So, Devin, you probably don’t have experience with it, but it was not good. And then when we started. Inverse, we were just starting to do the fundraising and then inflation hit and interest rates hit and the stock market was crashing. And it’s, you know, if you’re talking about. And like an investment research platform and in the investing environments, not so good. You know, people aren’t as interested because they’re losing money, so. On the Surface 2. Scenarios of bad timing. However, I don’t hold to that notion of bad timing. It may look like bad timing on the surface, but time passes and then that bad timing turns out to be good timing. So it’s a bit of a wait and see. I will say that I haven’t gotten serious about fundraising for inverse because of what’s happened in the marketplace. We went back to bootstrapping and I’m very, very focused on revenue. Laying the ground for fundraising but not being active at it at this stage. So I guess what’s different is back in the couple of days like we just. Kind of kept. We, you know, we knocked maybe for longer than we should have because it just was not the the right time. And this time, at least I have the experience of going through a bad. Time to raise money. Realizing that it can be negotiated and just keeping my focus more on the business rather than at knocking on doors.

 

Hessie Jones

So let me ask when you were raising with Hyper Wallet to talk to me about the dynamics between you and the Co founders in your company, what was what was that like like would you consider best friends, I guess because you started the company together that you had worked in previous companies. Together, what was your relationship like with? Your Co founders.

 

Jennifer Cameron

Well, I very much admired my co-founder. I thought that she was brilliant and I still do. I still admire her. I still think she’s brilliant. I think we went through a big honeymoon phase at the beginning. There was so much enthusiasm about what we were doing and we did raise some some early financing, roughly about half, $1,000,000 before, you know things got too too bad. So there’s all this energy that we’re pouring into it and. And then sort of, you know, reality started to hit as money started to dwindle out of the bank account and, you know, fundraising was becoming increasingly different. Difficult and we. Didn’t have. Proper business model at the time, like a way to make money.

 

Hessie Jones

So let me turn to Devin. Because as you grow your company and you realize that, OK. These are my business partners and my friends, but at the same time, now that we’re growing up, we have to actually start thinking about how we protect the business and how do we protect our individual interest in the company. What does that? Look like when when you get to that stage.

 

Devin Ramphal

Takes a lot of foresight, right, and I guess. Being so fresh like we’re we’re a first-time entrepreneurs, we didn’t really have companies before. Some of us had some professional experience in industry, but so the start-upup start a game as you know is a totally different game going through it a second time. I would do things very, very differently and I think Jen, Jen had a really good point where times. Age, right? And as an entrepreneur and when you’re working, you know, with your Co-founders and you’re raising this money, it’s it’s important to recognize the time frame that you’re in. And think to think about how that time frame could change in the future. For example, we raised money with with the venture capital firm in 2021, right. And at the time, you know, funding was fairly high, interest rates were low. It was relatively easy to raise funds. Just 12 months later. The tide starts to change, right? Like, as Jen said, like a cold wind was blowing from from California. So. The reins of the VC started to tighten up and we started to get squeezed a bit. And whereas in right in a regular time frame, VC would have said, yeah, we’ll give, we’ll extend your convertible note by, you know, X amount of months. That didn’t necessarily happen with us. It was really like, hey, you know, you got to. You gotta step it up. And by the way, we’re going to do X&Y to your company and add them. The other conditions and into your notes. So there’s I think having the foresight of of knowing what what time frame you’re in and how things could get worse or how things could get better is really important for an entrepreneur to know. And so much of the time as entrepreneurs, we’re just happy to raise money. Someone’s going to write us a check. Oh my God. Like, yeah, I’ll, I’ll take that. But if you don’t, if you have a good product and good business, someone will come and give you money. You don’t have to take this check today, right? And. I think that. Part is really. Important for us with with my Co founders and I we we we got super excited with the first check and then. We were even. More excited with the second check, right and. And ultimately, you know, you founders could end up digging themselves a hole for their startup company, right? If if, if you if you get too excited and carried away with being in that moment with with with that you know that funding, does that answer the question?

 

Hessie Jones

It it does, it does. So I wanna. I wanna actually talk about the relationship with your investors because you you have made a point of saying that, you know, people go with the money. Is, but that shouldn’t always be the case, because when people when companies go into relationships with investors like Sorry, financial relationship with investors, it’s really a marriage that’s going to last the length of the time that you know the the where the money keeps flowing so. For for you, maybe I’ll start with with, with Jennifer. What was it like when you were when you were raising? When you’re raising money? What kind of investors did you go after in the beginning?

 

Jennifer Cameron

I guess you’re talking about hyperbolic phase. When we were raising them, because we have.

 

Hessie Jones

Yes. Yeah. Or or and and. And yeah, and how did that change your criteria in for inverse too?

 

Jennifer Cameron

I think the the environment was different than it is now, so I don’t know if what I have to share is going to be entirely relevant for. For new investors for excuse me for new founders. It was a lot less structured than it is now. There weren’t accelerators, incubators, and that sort of thing. And all of the sort of was well, wisdom best practices? Maybe it’s the better word that have grown up around. He raised around testing and failing fast and all these sorts of things that just wasn’t there. So yeah, so I guess, I guess I just wanna, I just want. To be clear about that. I still I. I guess my strategy at this stage going forward is to. I want to when I start speaking with investors, I want to. I want to have as much power as I can and I believe that will come from having a strong company and strength comes from having product market fit which is. Just a, you know, 50 Cent way of saying there are people willing to pay for what you have so. That’s. I’m just I’m. I’m just more focused on business rather than fundraising at this stage for now for the moment.

 

Hessie Jones

But but you you also talked about coming from a position of strength. So I’m going to ask Devin, this is that so when you look for investors? What? What would you look for differently than you did in the beginning? Like what? What are the things that resonated with you?

 

Devin Ramphal

Yeah, yeah. For the company that we were building. So we were in the clean air dot AI was in the HVAC air filtration space. We had an an HVAC filter that produced hypocras air quality, but also reduce the energy consumption in the building. And we had sensors building to it. So you can know exactly when to change your filter and you can gather intelligence on on the air quality. The air quality in the building. So looking for an investor, what was important for us was someone that was connected in that space. It was that we weren’t just looking for and just for money, you know, we we were looking for someone that could make those strategic connections with customers. So the industry was property technology, our prop tech for short. We were looking for Proptech specific. And we found some, right. We found some we we started off the journey by joining a prop tech accelerator and this accelerator actually put some funds into the company. So that was really helpful. And through that prop tech accelerator, we actually and that was like our first round and then through this prop tech accelerator we actually met the more of like a larger. Prop Tech VC, who ended up putting some funds. In their round. So we were when we were identifying potential funders, I think we did a fairly a fairly good job like we were very. Tensional, we did have some funding that was offered to us from angels, but we again wanted to be very careful of like our CAP table. We’re trying to keep it as clean as possible, so we didn’t end up going with the funding from from, from the Angels. We stuck with the VC’s. But you also need the other part of this is you need to be careful. The strings that come with the funding right, we were offered funding from a few other sources and some of those other sources we didn’t want to, we didn’t want to go and attach yourself to those strings, right. You know, one of them would have made us relocate our company entirely. Which you know wasn’t. Uh, wasn’t really possible for us. And that’s just an example of some of the strings. That can come with the money.

 

Hessie Jones

Is there like from both your perspectives, knowing what you’ve lived through, especially with investor relationships from your perspective, was is there an? Inordinate amount of power imbalance when it comes to this, like Jen did you experience a power imbalance when when you, when you eventually got funding from from the investor side like how much that the kind of pressure that they would put on you as a company and a founder?

 

Jennifer Cameron

Well, I mean, as it turns out that first money that we raised was. Well, no, it it wasn’t too onerous or anything like that. It was just the person who happened to invest. He was. Just I guess. Bit of a. Different sort of guy. And no, it wasn’t. It wasn’t like your typical BC. I mean, he was a professional investor, but it was just different. It was just different time, right than it is now.

 

Hessie Jones

Why is that? Why? Like maybe, maybe. Devin, you can. You can answer that like, it just seems to be maybe the early 2000s were a different time when technology was starting to peak and then everything was like, Oh my God, I got to get into all this New stuff and now like there is I think because there there’s a reticence in in what’s happening in the market that investors too have put more pressure on founders to meet specific milestones and to the point that they’re they’re hovering, right, I mean what? Devin, what do you think?

 

Devin Ramphal

Yeah. Yeah. I think for me, it really depends on the, the the type of the investor and the type of the BC, right. So I’ve seen the smaller the investor, I I found that you have. More and more. Pressure, right? If you have a much bigger institutional investor, you have a little bit more flexibility and the founders have typically. Like a little bit more saying the company right, the smaller VCs, maybe they’re not as well known, they tend to exercise their strength and the power over over the founders and try to. A lot of them. It’s it’s it’s, it’s kind of weird because they some of them get the get the inclination that they could. Run the company better than the. Founders. But we’re seeing in the market that that’s not actually the case. So like a lot of these VC’s that take over a tech company and try to run it, they end up running it downwards instead of upwards, right? So it’s. And I I’m seeing that’s more common with the smaller, lesser known VC’s rather than the bigger VC’s. If, if I could give advice to a startup, I would say try to go to a bigger more well known VC and raise funds there. I think that would be a better experience than a smaller V. And that’s just. My personal opinion.

 

Hessie Jones

So let me let me pivot a little bit and and talk about a different type of relationship. So these are partners and suppliers. And so a lot of. Startups. They begin by not by trying to do everything themselves right, so they may not necessarily seek out potential partners or vendors early at the early stages where they could actually get some competitive advantage. So I’ll ask Jennifer this because first of all, in either through hyperwallet or or through inverse, do you rely on certain partnerships or or suppliers? And if if based on those two experiences? What are the things that you that you look for in defining a good partner or vendor relationship?

 

Jennifer Cameron

It’s certainly more relevant to talk about suppliers with respect to Invrs. So when we were creating inverse or sort we are, it’s still active creation, but. When we were first. And the idea was first there we needed data suppliers, but we weren’t sure what our business model was going to be and there was but a disconnect between how the supplier would price out their their data. Versus how we were going to be consuming it. And then, you know, earning money from it down the road so. But we needed that data in order to start building, and there are other. Tools and that sort of thing. So that was tricky. That was a tricky negotiation to try and. Create a contract that was flexible enough to support. You know where we thought we were going to go, but like I said, it was just where we think we’re going to go, so contracts, OK, it’s tolerable knowing what I know now, I would probably want to tweak it. They are receptive and good partners. And we have been able to make. Some changes to, like we reinterpreted what a customer was, which was, you know. Very good. My favorite and help. Us having to start paying additional money so so that was great. I guess what I would say the the piece of advice I would give to nascent entrepreneurs is to really read those contracts carefully. It’s so difficult because they can be so dry and they. They just. But if you can try and put yourself into different frames of mind under different scenarios, you may. It may be it may help to enlighten. What you’re signing on to and then give you some latitude to negotiate.

 

Hessie Jones

OK.

 

Jennifer Cameron

Things that would be more in your favor. But I think.

 

Hessie Jones

Yeah, go ahead Jen.

 

Jennifer Cameron

I think working with contracts and that sort of thing, I definitely think it’s something you get better at you. You need to have experience doing it and practice doing it.

 

Hessie Jones

I think so. The other thing about contracts is that I guess when you’re when like very, very early on, people don’t put as much importance in contracts because they think that hey, my friends doing something over here, let’s collaborate and then they failed to even put a good contract together to to make each other accountable for the things that they said that they would do, right. So I’m going to turn to to Devin because like. Choosing the right partner is going to be important, especially in the beginning when let’s say. You need to establish a certain level of trust, especially when you’re bootstrapping, and you don’t. You can’t necessarily afford to pay the supplier for the things that they that they are are providing you. So tell me what like what these negotiations or agreements? Like to to make sure that there’s some mutually beneficial thing that happens between the the both of you without one actually having a a stronger upper hand than the other.

 

Devin Ramphal

Yeah, yeah, no, it’s a good question. I would almost come back a little bit to what Jen was saying earlier and kind of watching how the winds are blowing, right and. A lot of the time when the start up signs a contract with someone, they’re very excited about it, right? And it’s it’s in a happy time and you know, hey, we have a new partner on board. All we got our first supplier locked in, there’s a lot of excitement. And UM and startups can. Caught in that right and not realizing that there’s going to be dozens of contracts down the road and more suppliers, right, that that you can secure. But I think it’s important to say, you know like from like different viewpoints like which ends at how can this go South? How can this relationship go South? How can this partnership go South? How can this supplier go South, right and. One of the key things that we learned. Is especially specifically to suppliers, multiple sources of supply always right. Never rely on a single source of supply. So we were a hardware company and we had to visit by these physical filters that we were selling to customers and. And it would have derisked our company greatly had we had a second source of supply, right. But so exclusivity is one thing to look for in these contracts, payment terms, right, net 30, net 60, net 90, ideally from a startup perspective, you want to push out your payment term as long as you can. The the supplier would want to squeeze it down as much as you can. Right. So working with that supplier to find that ballot. UM, keep an eye out for how the contract could be changed, right? You don’t want someone to make a unilateral change. These change. Like, if there’s a suggested change to the contract, you’d want it to be a mutual change. So those are a few of the things I’ve seen with supplier relationships. But coming back to partnerships in general. Hey guys. Can you repeat that part of the question? Has the partnership part?

 

Hessie Jones

Yeah, OK. So what did I say here? So what would it? What would the negotiation agreement look like so that there is equal benefit to both of you without one having the upper hand?

 

Devin Ramphal

Yeah, yeah, I would. I think there’s creative ways to do this with partnerships, right. One thing I would advise against is going in, going rushing into like any sort of joint venture or a 5050 partnership, 5050 partnerships, they, they there’s a lot of challenges with them, a lot of the time. They don’t work out as. Well, and essentially what happens with these 5050 partnerships is you can end up in a deadlock right between shareholders. Your board of directors, all of that. So avoid fifty 50s and try to find other ways that you can make that partnership equally even you don’t necessarily have to give equity for partnership. But if you’re in that situation. Where you know you found. We found a strategic partner that’s willing to put some money in and or give you X for a certain piece of equity. Don’t give a ton of your company away. Try try to hold as much as you can and try to find another way. Think from your partner. This potential partner shoes. What do they want, right? What’s in it for me with them? Right and. And try to see if you can give them something else other than equity or or control in your company. Keep your company the operations, the board as much internally as you can. I’ve been trying not to give. Too much of that out.

 

Hessie Jones

OK, perfect. So let’s go to the last topic where we’re going to talk to you and talk about you as the CEO and and what makes you tick. So Jennifer, as a two time founder, what do you think has kept you going despite the hurdles that you’ve experienced? And what do you think? What do you see in yourself that may not have been evident at the time of, let’s say, your first company?

 

Jennifer Cameron

So what keeps me going? I guess a desire to see my vision manifest. To put it simply. And what do I see in myself that I? Maybe didn’t have before. Well, I was pretty wet around the ears when. I co-founded Hyper wallets so you know I’ve added a lot of experience to that. One of the things that I heard back in the day was no credibility. So I did a lot of work to close that credibility gap again, like. Nobody’s going to say that to me again. And then there’s a lot of soft skills. I mean, business is about. You know. Improving your skills around empathetic listening. Trying to find. Win win scenarios. I mean, I just there’s a lot I would say that I’ve added since over the 20 years.

 

Hessie Jones

So this is something that you said you said being a leader is tough. You have to give courage when you feel none. I don’t find any of that easy. You have to be curious and you have to have faith in yourself. But I do know I’m improving as a leader. I know I’m better than I was when I started paper wallet. I can evaluate my decisions objectively. So what do you think? How you changed as a leader over time?

 

Jennifer Cameron

So that quote. That’s still true from where I sit right now, it is tough to be a leader. You do have to show you do have to encourage other people. You have to be curious asking those questions. It’s really a skill of art. Rather than just, you know, maybe jumping to a conclusion.

 

Hessie Jones

Is there a now? Would you say that you did anything differently and and back then I don’t even know if there is a thing called mental health back in the but now it like it seems to be a way for a lot of founders to actually find strength if they have the time to meditate.

If they have time to take care of themselves, like their mental health or their physical health is, that is that something that has changed with you as well?

 

Jennifer Cameron

I you know, in a way, I think life has even gotten more difficult than it was. I mean, now I have a family I have any and, you know, a parent is dying. It’s really gotten more difficult. And the demands on my mental health have grown. So yeah, I meditate. I do a lot of a lot of internal work. I really try to keep my I find if I focus on what I don’t want, it’s not helpful at all. I have to keep, you know, quote UN quote eyes on the prize. The vision of where I want it to get to and how that’s going to feel. So you have to, yeah, you have to be intentional about your emotional state, absolutely.

Hessie Jones

Thank you. So, Devin, let’s turn in to to turn to you about the topic of asking for help, because you, you, you are all for it. I know, I know you you have relied on mentors to help you while you were dealing with some some. Issues with with your company. Tell me about the importance of mentorship and and seeking advice and how what that has meant to you during that time.

 

Devin Ramphal

Yeah, it’s a. It’s a good question. I think you know, as the co-founder, CEO of a company, it’s especially the CEO role like it’s very lonely at the top, right. There’s not a lot of people that you can turn to, especially around you like it in your executive circle, in your coping circle and your director circle. You can’t necessarily turn and speak to these people openly about about some of the issues that are the companies having, or even you’re having personally. So very lonely at the top as the CEO, but having external advisors was one of the most powerful things for for us at clean air and all through my entrepreneurial journey. I I I had an EIR multiple IR like one at at altitude accelerator. I had one all the way in Guelph. I had another one that was a professor at at Rotman where I would. And I would routinely and especially as you know, we’re going through the acquisition phases as we’re raising funds as we’re negotiating with the suppliers and building this partner relationship. I would be on on the phone with these advisors and really just using these advisors as sounding importance, right. That’s all it really is. It’s you’re you’re asking some questions and you’re getting some feedback. And as the CEO, it’s your job to take that feedback and just you make the decision on it whether you want to take it or not, take it or take action on it or do the the total opposite. It’s entirely up to you. But as as long as you’re gathering as many of these qualified opinions as you can. And and then I find that you’re essentially collecting this data, and that allows you to navigate a little bit better as as the CEO. So advisors very critical, multiple advisors, very critical because there’s times when my advisors were saying the total opposite, right and that would help me calibrate in terms of the next steps. So yeah, I would highly recommend having multiple diverse advisors for for anybody growing your company.

 

Hessie Jones

OK so I have one more question to to ask both of you as you look. Yeah, and you, let’s say, reconcile your vision of entrepreneurship based on what’s real and based on what you envision, what was the most telling lesson for you, Jennifer, like regrets, anything that you would do differently? What do you think?

 

Jennifer Cameron

I think. Having faith. Is really important. Because when it’s dark and leak, which it certainly will be from time to time. Have to have faith and I think that goes circles back to what you started this podcast with resilience and how much you’re going to hang on. To make your vision a reality. Because it’s not about, it’s not about the honeymoon stage. It’s not about, you know. When things are great, the the the. When the rubber hits the road is when things are really dark. And that’s what you must get through.

 

Hessie Jones

Thank you. That’s powerful. Devin, what do you think?

 

Devin Ramphal

Yeah, regrets. I don’t. I don’t have any regrets. I would do it all over again if I could. The amount of learning that came out of it was unbelievable, right? It was just like the the things that we were put through as a company, the challenges we faced, I can’t put a value on that education that it that, that it taught me. Would I do things differently 100%? But but that doesn’t mean I regret it, right? Just looking back, there’s a million mistakes that we’ve made, but that’s, that’s again how we learn, right? That’s how we grow. So I wouldn’t go back and change anything. It is, it is what it is. But for the next time I know way, way better, I won’t make the same mistakes twice, right. So definitely happy. Happy with the experience of going through it and. And no regrets.

 

Hessie Jones

Thank you. So I think that’s going to be our last word and and that’s all we have time for today and I thank both Jennifer and Devin for lending the wisdom to this important. Topic and sharing your journeys about a topic that not many people talk about. So thank you again for coming. If you and our audience have any topics that you do want us to cover, please drop us the line at communications@altitudeaccelerator.ca in the meantime. Have fun and stay safe.

Host Information
Hessie Jones

Hessie Jones is an Author, Strategist, Investor and Data Privacy Practitioner, advocating for human-centred AI, education and the ethical distribution of AI in this era of transformation. 

She currently serves as the Innovations Manager at Altitude Accelerator. She provides the necessary support for Altitude Accelerator’s programs including Incubator and Investor Readiness. She will be the liaison among key stakeholders to provide operational support and ultimately drive founder success. 

LinkedIn

You can also listen to this podcast on Spotify.

Please subscribe to our weekly LinkedIn Live newsletters.

The post Startup Resilience Navigating Relationships for Early-Stage Founders appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>
Hero AI Seeks to Transform Mindsets in the Lagging Healthcare Sector https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/hero-ai-seeks-to-transform-mindsets-in-the-lagging-healthcare-sector-2/ Fri, 16 Feb 2024 21:16:34 +0000 https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/?p=128745 The resistance to change is emblematic in a sector that has idealized practices and the legacy systems that have been working for decades. One founder seeks to disrupt this. AI… Continue reading Hero AI Seeks to Transform Mindsets in the Lagging Healthcare Sector

The post Hero AI Seeks to Transform Mindsets in the Lagging Healthcare Sector appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>

The resistance to change is emblematic in a sector that has idealized practices and the legacy systems that have been working for decades. One founder seeks to disrupt this.

AI adoption continues to lag in the healthcare sector. The complexity and sensitivity of patient data, how they’re governed and communicated within systems and between institutions requires significant time and investment. The last decade saw health information data slowly becoming digitized however strict privacy regulations, security requirements, and liability concerns–have all made AI challenging to fully integrate into the industry.

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare holds immense potential for transforming patient care and outcomes. Navigating the ethical landscape of healthcare data usage is a crucial consideration.

I met with Devin Singh, the founder and CEO of Hero AI, an early-stage health tech company, to delve into the challenges surrounding healthcare data usage, the need for advocacy as he pushes for significant change within a highly regulated sector.

Transcript

Hessie Jones

Hi everyone. I’m Hessie Jones and welcome back to Tech Uncensored. We are here at collision 2023 and here I am speaking today to Devin Singh who is the founder and CEO of Hero AI. I welcome Devin.

 

Devin Singh

That’s right. Oh, it’s a pleasure to be here. And what an incredible conference this is. Being able to meet folks like you and to talk about all things tech, AI, ethics, responsibility, super interested in this conversation we are going to have.

 

Hessie Jones

OK, awesome. So, let’s talk about, first of all, hero AI tell us the barebones. What is it about? What are you attempting to solve?

 

Devin Singh

Well, you know what I’m going to do is I’ll tell you a story that is actually the catalyst point that caused us to create Hero AI and it’s a bit of a Side Story, to be honest. So, I’m also an emergency doctor at SickKids Hospital. Many years ago, when I was a junior doctor, we had a young patient die, a preventable death, partially because they were waiting too long and it was really difficult, right? I remember doing CPR. The team came together, provided outstanding care. But many aspects of this case, whether it was presenting too late to hospital, prolonged wait times, different resources contributed to this terrible outcome. And I just remember being so angry that this could happen. And it drove me to think through, well, how do we really think in a dramatically different way on solving meaningful problems in healthcare? And so that’s what led me to go from doctor to computer scientists in AI. So, I did a Masters in Computer Science and artificial intelligence, and we started to realize that we needed to find a way to empower hospitals. To do more with less and we needed to find a way to empower hospitals to liberate their electronic health record data so that they could solve problems like this in a really agile way. So that’s what here what it does. So, we essentially, we take real time streaming health record data, we feed them into decision logic or machine learning algorithms and then we output to highly customizable front end user faces which is a web app, a patient app, a provider app and figuring out how do you do that in a way where it literally takes hours to customize and deploy rather than weeks to months, is the innovation that here I sought for.  So, what that means is that we can actually be in a meeting, discover that there’s a problem, like a real clinical problem in a hospital and rapidly spin up solutions and get to testing and deployment at a speed that’s really never been seen before in Healthcare.

Hessie Jones

OK, so you said something interesting there liberate patient data, which is scary, especially for if you talk to the Privacy Commissioner, you talk to anybody. Even in the healthcare space, because as you know, patient data is considered one of the most sensitive information out there. So how do you do something like that within the guise of compliance without putting risk to the information especially? From an app perspective, that probably will have to go through an equivalent of like a Health Canada or an FDA approval.

 

Devin Singh

It’s a really great question because we must remember that at the core of healthcare and providing outstanding care to a patient is the trust that you have between a health system and a patient or it’s that trust that you have between a physician and that person you’re caring for. So that trust is critical. And so one of the things that we’ve done is we’ve done obsessive stakeholder engagement to interview not only just parents and families. It’s like it’s but the kids themselves, right? Like, how do you feel about the way your data might be used? And so there is that point of understanding that the user really well and trying to gather what do they want to see happen to their data and what are their concerns about their data. But then there’s also that point around like legislation, privacy law. You know, we’re working with a set of laws that really wasn’t built, to think about big data and so how do you then take these opinions that are really important from those patients? How do you harmonize that with? What are the boundaries of the law? And then how do you add layers of cybersecurity? How do you add layers of patient safety and be really obsessed about delivering a product that checks all those boxes? That was really difficult. Like it took us years to go through a really authentic engagement with both lawmakers with Health Canada and with our patients and and even like privacy commissioners and experts to figure out how do we harmonize those things together in a way that’s really genuine and authentic. And that’s what. Is there a single clear path right now in Canada to go from creating an AI innovation like what we’ve done to then getting it deployed safely and in a way that respects privacy? There isn’t, because the laws weren’t written for AI specifically, but that’s part of the advocacy that our group does as well. So I have my AI researcher hat at Sickkids as well, and part of the research I do is around regulatory reform, privacy reform. How do we think through creating streamlined pathways that can ensure we can deliver AI solutions to patients, but do it in a way that is obsessed with privacy? Obsessed with equity, right? Obsessed with fairness to make sure that these solutions are actually closing health gaps rather than widening them.

 

Hessie Jones

So, we’ll unpack that a little bit because from your, my perspective when I think of systemic racism, it’s included within the hospital system, there’s only limited amounts of data that we have that can treat patients based on a limited set of circumstances. And so, what you’re advocating for is aggregation of data from almost anywhere within the healthcare system that allows you to surface some insights about a certain disease and to be able to have it be inputted from all from all areas, from, all from, from, genders, from different ethnicities. So, you can understand the impacts and also potential solutions that that actually impact some of those different groups.

 

 

Devin Singh

And so well, what we do is rather than thinking of such big picture because that could be scary, even hearing you describe that I’m a little bit scared about privacy and technology. And I think that patients and the public get scared. About these big sweeping ideas that we’re trying to absorb all the data and we’re trying to build these, these all-knowing AI solutions, that’s not necessarily it at all. So, what we’re really thinking about is what might be a very specific clinical problem that an emergency department might be struggling with. So, let’s say wait times for getting an abdominal ultrasound, right? Let’s say you might have appendicitis. For you to get that surgery, you’re going to arrive at the emergency department. You’re going to get that ultrasound done, and then that’s going to give the diagnosis. To get that surgical intervention you really need, right? So, we want that time to be really short. So we will discover that here’s a problem in healthcare, and then we will figure out what is the specific data that we need around that problem to build an AI model that might then be able to diagnose that you likely have an appendicitis, and then while you’re waiting those four hours, why don’t we just order the ultrasound, right? Why don’t we get the test done while you’re waiting? That’s research that we do. As kids right now, as we’re thinking through, how can we use AI and automated ordering potentially in a really precise way to advance care moving faster. But then you raised some really interesting. We could deploy that, and we’ve got really great perspective trial data that shows that this works really, really well, right. But here’s a really interesting point. How do we know that that model is going to perform equally depending on your language preference or depending on your gender or depending on your race? From my perspective as an emergency clinician, as an AI researcher at SickKids and as an innovator in the industry space. We must stand tall and proud and say to the public, here’s a solution that we’re deploying. Yes, you’re going to get that ultrasound way faster now. But it’s going to be fair regardless of what you look like, regardless of how old you are, what your gender is. And let’s say that there are areas where the performance slightly differs. We have to be transparent about that. So how do you do that? You need that data we can build the models off of the clinical data like the triage notes, the symptoms that people have, and we can build high performing models. But if I don’t know in that data set what your ethnicity is, I could never do the audit on the model to be able to say that. Yes, it truly is equitable. And so that’s a really key point of advocacy here is that if we just say ignore collecting that data, let’s just not even look at it. Let’s assume care is equal for everyone. Well, your initial premise was that care isn’t necessarily equal for everyone. We need that data to demonstrate where those deficiencies might lie for certain groups of people. And we also need that data to then really challenge the model and demonstrate that it is fair, or it isn’t fair, right? That transparency is needed. So that’s the thing that I advocate for deeply is around how do you create a regulatory landscape that promotes doing that, but then you can’t regulate something if there’s no data to then expect the innovator to be able to have access to do it right. And so it’s trying to merge these worlds together. And really this comes from like the patient perspective, we have to do this for our patients.

 

Hessie Jones

It just seems like an uphill battle like I know the way that the Canadian data landscape works. I know about health information custodians, who will die protecting that data. It’s not supposed to be shared. I mean that’s under the law. So how are you dealing with HIPAA Compliance and how are you trying to make them think differently from the perspective of patient outcomes? Are they receptive to rewriting or augmenting laws to be able to do that?

 

Devin Singh

Well, you know, it’s so powerful about healthcare is that when you drill down to that initial story that I told you about. Right. That’s really touching. Like this isn’t about circumventing laws and trying to figure out how do we just get something to market really fast this is. Think about trying to genuinely improve the way we provide care to patients and literally save lives like it’s written on their shirt here, transform, care, save lives. So, when you go into these meetings with privacy experts, regulatory experts, and you really galvanized support around like, this is why we were doing this. Yes, it’s an uphill battle. And it’s going to be an upper bound. I start off with these meetings. This is going to be challenging to work through, but remind ourselves why we’re doing it, right. We’re genuinely trying to improve the lives of Canadians in the healthcare system, right? A system that’s in crisis and overrun, and so that as a starting point, you’d be surprised, is incredibly powerful. Everything we do, it’s the kids, everything we do at hero AI all falls under the banner of being HIPAA compliant. It has to be right or else you’re breaking the law like it has to be. But you’d be surprised how people can help you navigate that complicated space when they’re genuinely motivated about trying to save a kid’s life because that’s really what this is all for, right? I never thought I would become a computer scientist by any means. Nor did I thought I would be at Collision trying to launch a new health tech company. But the real mode of is that case when that case happened, a fire ignited in me, and I said can’t be how healthcare in Canada is right now. It just can’t. And so, I am running up that hill really fast and we’re making the change to see these things happen.

 

Hessie Jones

OK, so what is your goal this year and what kind of hurdles have you run into and or have you kind of exceeded some of those hurdles?

 

Devin Singh

So all of those uphill battles that you were talking about around privacy, exploring like, what are the regulatory boundaries access to the data? Thankfully, we’ve run up that hill and we were now sort of at the top, being able to take a breath because we’ve got really great foundations in place. Like I said, we’ve done that patient stakeholder engagement to really, genuinely understand what their concerns are so that we respect that and now this year is all about deployment and impact. So, we’ve got models, for example, where if you’re a high-risk patient, I’m coming into sick, it’s the emergency department, whether it be a transplant. Or a cardiac issue. Our model will see if you’re waiting too long and flag that and send an alert to an app to make sure. You don’t wait too long, right? Something that someone said to me just earlier today was, you know, wait times are inconvenient for most people, but that’s often all it is. But for some people, wait, wait times is life and death. So, our algorithm is really detecting those people who really can’t wait and elevating them so that they get seen faster, right? We’re deploying that and the impact that we’re going to see from that is just incredible, right. We’ve also got a use case that we’re looking to deploy. It’s in beta testing right now around automating the advocacy for people with mental health issues. So now when a kiddo in a mental health crisis comes to our emergency department very soon. What will happen is, and if they’re in a real crisis, an automated alert will get sent to the psychiatry team. And that’s just the way technology saying, hey, there’s someone who needs your help. They haven’t yet seen the doctor, but why don’t you come down and begin providing that care? Think of how powerful that is with automation. Children with autism come into our emergency department. It can be really challenging to wait in a highly stimulating environment like the ED . We automate an alert to a child life specialist so that they can come and support that family during the process. Learning all through process automation all through that template of streaming health record data, decision logic, Rai algorithm and then output to a front end user interface right that that template allows us to just unlock the creativity and a lot of it you’ll see is like we’re just advocating for patients like using AI to advocate for patients’ need at massive scale, but that’s what’s so rewarding about all this.

 

Hessie Jones

That’s amazing. So I just want to tell you a really. Quick story before we wrap up my son. He was diagnosed with tonsillitis back in 2014. He was a little bit old to actually get the surgery because it would take much longer for him to recover, so we went through three specialists who all did not agree, one said make him get the surgery, the other one said. He’ll get over it. We took a third shot at a doctor at sick kids. And he said, yeah, just give him amoxicillin. It should be fine. So, seven years later, my son still has breathing problems. His tonsils are covering his airwaves. We finally gave him the surgery and it’s not only about the wait time. It’s about trying to make sure that the diagnosis is consistent, but also the remediation has to be consistent because if he had that, you know 7-8 years ago, it would have stopped a lot of the headaches that we. Experience today and his recovery time would been faster and he’d be able to breathe. And that’s the big, big part of it so.

 

Devin Singh

And and I know that those symptoms are so bothersome to kiddos, adults. I mean, imagine you as an adult, let alone a little kiddo. Right, so bothersome. But here’s where I’m hopeful in that exact story. Is that probably for 9 out of the 10 kids. Maybe it would have gotten better, and maybe that’s the experience that these clinicians encounter. But is there something unique about your son in this case where you’re right, maybe that decision should have been to do surgery faster. This is where this concept of precision medicine starts to come into play, right? How can we leverage AI? How can we leverage data and a precision medicine type framework to, you know what, actually, you should probably get the surgery earlier because it seems like according to this prediction, you might not respond in the way that everyone else typically does, right? That’s the promise of AI and healthcare right now, it’s definitely a major focus for the hospital. People at the kids and for a lot of these big research institutes around the world is pivoting from this one-size-fits-all type of medicine to a precision medicine framework is going to be incredibly revolutionary. And I’m so proud that Hero AI is trying to, like, bring that to the bedside and is contributing to that advancement in care.

 

Hessie Jones

Yeah, I I’m really happy that you’re here and I’m happy you’re contributing at a time when we have an aging population and our hospitals are probably going to be overfilled with those types of patients, so. Thank you for coming up today and I wish you luck, OK.

 

Devin Singh

Thank you so much for the time. Appreciate it.

Host Information
Hessie Jones

Hessie Jones is an Author, Strategist, Investor and Data Privacy Practitioner, advocating for human-centred AI, education and the ethical distribution of AI in this era of transformation. 

She currently serves as the Innovations Manager at Altitude Accelerator. She provides the necessary support for Altitude Accelerator’s programs including Incubator and Investor Readiness. She will be the liaison among key stakeholders to provide operational support and ultimately drive founder success. 

LinkedIn

You can also listen to this podcast on Spotify.

Please subscribe to our weekly LinkedIn Live newsletters.

The post Hero AI Seeks to Transform Mindsets in the Lagging Healthcare Sector appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>
Is 2024 the Year of Investor Restraint and Startup Resilience? https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/is-2024-the-year-of-investor-restraint-and-startup-resilience/ Fri, 16 Feb 2024 19:00:52 +0000 https://altitudeaccelerator.ca/?p=128735 Will 2024 will be another challenging year for startup founders? The world bank came out with the following prediction for 2024: “Global growth is projected to slow for the third… Continue reading Is 2024 the Year of Investor Restraint and Startup Resilience?

The post Is 2024 the Year of Investor Restraint and Startup Resilience? appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>

Will 2024 will be another challenging year for startup founders?

The world bank came out with the following prediction for 2024:

“Global growth is projected to slow for the third year in a row—from 2.6% last year to 2.4% in 2024, almost three-quarters of a percentage point below the average of the 2010s. Developing economies are projected to grow just 3.9%, more than one percentage point below the average of the previous decade.”

They are dubbing it the “Weakest Half-Decade Performance in 30 Years”.

This is a so-called recession that never really came (because of low unemployment, despite higher interest rates) there are indications similar to what we’ve seen at the start of the Ukraine/Russia war (2 years ago) that set off an economic fallout that saw the steep fall of Crypto and NFT and, in parallel massive investment pullout from overvalued startups that received millions in funding during the pandemic.

This time while the global economy is in a better place, mounting geopolitical tensions. Innovation will take a hit as we’ve already witnessed at the end of 2023 with rising tech layoffs.

“Amazon saw the most workers laid off in 2023 (27,410 workers) followed by Meta (21,000), Google (12,115) and Microsoft (11,158)”. This continued as we ventured into the new year with more layoffs from Big Tech.

In the fall of 2023 David Wright, Investment Analyst remarked, “Investor returns in the VC industry have not always paid up for the risks involved in private investments.”

Wright noted that in the last 4 decades, VC fund performance had its ebbs and flows with the mid-to late nineties being the standout period. “The average returns from VC investments have consistently hovered around 9%, comparable to public markets,” but Wright highlights that the more telling metric is the “1.8% returns indicating that there is a disproportionate performance that favors a handful of VCs while the “majority have largely underperformed.”

Will investors be more measured and discriminating in their search for promising ventures this year? For founders, what is in store for them as the year unfolds and how should they be managing their businesses to improve growth, increase their visibility to investors, and to essentially weather this uncertainty?

We were pleased to host three seasoned startup advisors and investors:

  • Bryan Duarte – Bryan Duarte is a Social Venturist, Serial Entrepreneur, a Professional Engineer and has over 30 years of experience in the Energy Industry. He is the Managing Partner at BlackTech Capital and our newest EIR at Altitude Accelerator.
  • Glenn Nishimura – Glenn Nishimura is the Principal and Chief People Strategist at Nishimura Consulting, based in Toronto, Canada. As an experienced advisor, consultant, and mentor, he helps early and growth stage startups and scale-ups across North America, Asia, and Europe to build and optimize their teams, culture, and people operations.
  • Olga Cruz – Olga Cruz is a Senior Associate at impact investing firm Good & Well. She leads the impact management practice and sources, analyzes, and invests in early-stage Canadian businesses. Her prior roles involved investing in healthcare and agricultural innovations. She also dedicated her efforts to supporting entrepreneurs in conflict-affected regions, guiding them towards investor readiness.
Transcript

Hessie Jones

Well, 2024 would be another challenging year for startups. Well, the World Bank actually came out with the following prediction for this year. They said that global growth is projected to slow for the third year. In a row. From 2.6% last year to 2.4% this year, almost 3/4 of a percentage point below the average in the 2000 and. 10s. They’re also saying that developing economies are projected to grow just 3.9%, which is 1 percentage point below the average of the previous decade. They are dubbing this the weakest half decade performance in 30 years.

Hi everyone. My name is Hessie Jones and welcome to Tech Uncensored. This is the so-called recession that never really came, and the reason I say that is that we’ve had in in the last little while low unemployment, despite the fact that we’ve had high interest rates. But there are indications similar to what we’ve seen. At the start of the Ukraine-Russia War Two years ago that set off this economic fallout where we saw a fall of both crypto and NFT’s at the same time. There was this massive investment pullout from overvalued startups that received millions in funding during the pandemic. So this time, while the economy is in a better place, we still see mounting geopolitical tensions that will actually weigh in and influence what what happens with investment this year.

What we’ve seen in 2023 is something that we we continue to see at the turn of the the, the new Year with the rising tech. Layoffs. It was amazing to me how many workers were laid off last year. Amazon saw the most with over 27,000 workers Meta 21,000. Google and Microsoft, respectively around 12,000. So in the fall of last year, I spoke to David Wright, who’s an investment analyst, and he said, and I quote, investor returns in the VC industry, have not always paid up for the risks involved in private investments. So he noted that in the last four decades BC performance. Added as the ads and flows with the 90s being the standout period, but the average returns from VC’s have always consistently hovered around 9% compared to many of the public markets. But he highlights that the most telling metric is 1.8. Percent returns, indicating that there is this disproportionate performance that favors only a handful of BC’s, while the majority of them have actually underperformed.

So the question is, will investors be more measured and discriminating in their search for promising new ventures this year? For founders, what’s actually in store for them as the year? And how should they be managing their businesses, not only to improve growth but increase their visibility to investors and essentially weather this storm of uncertainty. So thank you everyone for joining. I’m pleased to.

I’m pleased to be joined today by three seasoned startup advisors and investors. And I will add them to the stage.

Welcome. Brian Duarte, who is a social venturist he is a serial entrepreneur, a professional engineer, and has over 30 years experience in the energy sector. He is a managing partner at Black Tech Capital and our newest EIR at Altitude Accelerator. Welcome, Brian.

And Glenn Nishimura is the principal and chief people strategist at Nishimura Consulting, which is based here in Toronto. He’s an experienced advisor, consultant and mentor and helps many early and growth stage startups and scale ups across North America, Asia, Europe, builder and optimizer, teams, culture and people operations.

And finally, last but not least, Olga Cruz, who is a senior associate. That impact investing firm good and well, and she leaves the impact management practice and sources analyzes, invests in early stage Canadian business. Her prior roles involved investing in healthcare and agriculture innovations, and she has dedicated her efforts to actually supporting entrepreneurs in conflict affected regions, guiding guiding them towards investment readiness.

So welcome everyone. Thank you. OK, so we have a full group today and I’m sure you all have your opinions on what’s happening with the economy and how this affects boundaries.

So let me start with Brian. Is David Wright correct? Investor returns in the VC industry have not always paid up to the risk of in private investment investments and more importantly, he says that there is this disproportionate performance that favors only a few VC’s.

Bryan Duarte

So yes, he is right, I mean. People, I think we exist in this myth that all VC’s, you know, overall it’s performing well, it’s doing well. But if you go and dig into the numbers, what he’s saying is absolutely correct and it’s borne out. If you look at 2121, twenty 20/20/2022, there was a lot of money thrown in by. VC funds VC. Firms into startups without, in some cases doing a lot of diligence, and I think the number I saw this morning, if you discount for large investments into companies like open AI, it’s $88 billion in write downs that has happened over over the last year. So yes, overall. The the industry hasn’t performed that well and it’s it’s. Favoring the seller. Few and that’s why I think going into 2024, you’re going to see a lot more investor diligence, right, not only from investors themselves in, in the funds, but investors looking at who to invest into. So where you look at that from the startup perspective, it’s going to take longer. Before they get money put into. Because investors are going to hopefully be doing more diligence, I mean, I could speak for myself. One of the things. That we do. We actually start working with founders well before we’re ready to make an investment to understand who they are, what they’re doing, what they’re building, and can we help them? Can we help them be successful? We’re not one of those venture funds. Just put the money in and hope the company is going to be successful. I think the smarter investors are going to be working closely with the founders, whether it’s connecting them or their networks, providing them different expertise that they’re going to need along the way as their companies grow. But it’s going to take a lot more diligence from investors to to break that. Cycle, but it’s still probably will be those funds that are doing those sort of things that are going to be successful and from the startup perspective, it’s going to take time as I just said.

 

Hessie Jones

OK, so I assume that you’re the same way like you build relationships with founders earlier on, before you actually start investing, right? And I know this is this is one way to to minimize risk in the future because you you know that they have something there they you like their team. You’ve built your relationship with them overtime, but you you also say that and I want you to respond to that. But you also talked about the fact that 2023, despite it being a tough year for startups. Is that the fear induced by the overall decrease in in funding led to this natural selection process that you call entrepreneurial Darwinism? So can you expand on that?

 

Olga Cruz

Yes, of course, has its soul. First the dress. What the brand was saying 100%. We want to meet the founders even before they are starting to raise and develop that relationship. I think that even the process of building an investment memo, it’s a chance to see if you can trust this person to understand if you can work with them so. Definitely is a key part of the due diligence and the and how we build. Friendships and then back to your question about entrepreneurial Darwinism. So 2023 was certainly a year that impacted investor confidence. And I mean, you’ve probably seen that overall global funding decreased by 30%. Six year low, so definitely funders are paying way more conservative and valuations have been recalibrated. And I think that here what is really exciting now is that we get to see who are the founders that survive. So I don’t mean that it’s the law of the jungle and that everything can be justified, even going beyond business. Bit but what I’m trying to say is that it’s really exciting to see now who are the founders that survived based on the creativity they were. And and these are usually qualities that we see blended in the. For social entrepreneurs, because for them it’s about admission is not just something that they’re doing to get some money. For these founders, it’s about it’s part of their DNA. So you see that this. And you see how they’re actually building long term value and more sustainable business models. So I think that’s probably what we will see a bit more in 2024. In fact, I would say that January has been a month in which the founders that we’re meeting are actually not just providing the milestones and showing the traction, but also showing how they have been managing their cash flows, how. They’re going to reach break even, so those are some of the key differences that we’re seeing right now.

 

Hessie Jones

OK, thank you. And so Glenn, I’ve gone, I’ve gone gone on this panel because you you look at things a little bit differently from the founders perspective and so you you see how a lot of these outside forces are actually impacting companies internally within their teams. And within the organization so. What did 2023 look like for a lot of these founders and and you know, what do you see in terms of, you know, how how maybe some of them are fortunate than others? And did they behave differently and in in the last year or so?

 

Glenn Nishimura

Yeah. What a year it was. I can definitely tell you from a people perspective, the general mood was was similar to how most of us feel just before we go to the dentist, and that’s to say fear and worry. I saw a lot of team anxiety last year. It was definitely higher than usual. Not surprising. Given the fact that we had, as you mentioned before, layoff news on an almost daily basis, not just one or two key executives, but 50 people, one day, 100 people the next day, 200 the day after that entire companies folding. So it left a lot of people wondering, Oh my God, am I next. When’s the hammer going to fall? If I do stay, am I going to take on more work? I don’t get paid enough. Maybe I should brush up my resume just in case, you know. So that leads, it leads to a lot of sleepless nights for a lot of people. And I think culturally it. It soured what was otherwise a fun and very enjoyable place to work. I think the only people who probably who weren’t worried at all were the senior engineers and working in AI. You know, we’ve seen our salaries jump about 12% just in the last three months alone. So they’re sitting pretty. But yes, Founders definitely had it roughest, especially first time founders who hadn’t gone through this kind of thing before. 1 client of mine in Europe, he was contemplating with his Co founders, a third round of layoffs last year. And another client of mine in Singapore, they were they were pretty much choking up when we were talking about who was potentially on the chopping block and how they were going to actually break the news and handle all of those layoffs. So yeah, it was. It was a year that was very stressful and I think it’s a year that a lot of startup founders. Would rather soon forget.

 

Hessie Jones

Yeah, I don’t know it. It seems to be rolling over this year and I I think the one thing that I I want to point out and I I just listening to the news and then just watching the stuff that’s happening on Wall Street.

It it seems like there’s the layoffs happen and then because of a bottom line thing, they did meet specific goals. And then what we end up seeing probably in the next. Few months is that there are going to be people that will be rehired and.

 

Glenn Nishimura

Yeah, that’s. That’s unfortunately the ebbs and flows of the way this industry works, you know, so you know, not, not surprisingly, the fortunate ones who actually fared a little bit better than others. They were probably among the smartest. Because they were the ones who didn’t massively or needlessly over hire during the boom time. So they didn’t have to lay off as many people or go through as many rounds of layoffs as. Other people, and if they did lay people off, they managed to get away with doing it only once, even if it was an exceptionally large number, they only had to do it once, you know? They followed the old adage we have of cut once cut deep. Because if you have repeated layoffs, and especially if they’re very close together, it’s usually a good indication that the initial cuts weren’t. Deep enough.

 

Hessie Jones

Right, right. And and that’s the unfortunate thing is everything’s tied to certain metrics. And if you don’t hit those metrics then you know a fallout happens. So Brian, let me let me ask you this. You yourself see that maybe this could be a pivotal pivotal maybe year for generative? AI, or AI in general, we’re starting to see parts of it after, after last year, making slides within, like across industries for productivity, for content management. And now it’s starting to. To make its way like across organizations, how do you think in General AI will play out?

 

Bryan Duarte

In general. For one thing, it’s become a general buzzword. So everyone, everyone is following AI. Almost every single tech company I talked to has AI involved, so you part of it’s going to be. If I look at the investor perspective or even the consumer perspective. Doing a deep dive into truly what is AI for that particular company? Is it just some simple machine learning where they’re able to analyze a large data set or is there more depth to it? What is the data sets? What’s the model? So there’s a lot of components to AI, but it is definitely something that’s. Even when it is exploiting, I mean you’ve got companies out there that are using it for reasons to either lay off or not hire. Certain people, and we know that it can make better decisions you look at, say, doctors for example and the amount of times that they’re wrong, you know, but yet they don’t have exposure and individual doctor doesn’t have exposure to the latest techniques happening all the way around the world from in the space-time sustainability and clean tech. What’s the latest? What’s going on? So being able to use AI to analyze what’s happening in the different areas to be able to do predictions off of that analysis to fill in the gap? It’s going to be a crucial component and so the successful companies this year are going to be those that are able to exploit an AI’s capabilities, but also combine it with their own own own knowledge and their own way of putting it. Because I know you may have mentioned that, you know, general intelligence. You know or general is is on its way. I think that’s a long way away. I don’t see that as coming anytime soon. However, being able to be creative and that’s what we as human beings are good at. So being able to take that creativity and utilize the tools AI to me is just another tool. It’s no different than you know, when the Internet came to our capabilities. How can you use it? Those that can utilize use it, utilize it and make the best. Utilize are going to be doing the best, so definitely a key thing and understanding how to use it is going to be critical.

 

Hessie Jones

Thank you. So Olga, when we talk about, you know how perspective ventures make themselves a little bit more visible to investors, you talked about the importance of alignment. So what does what does this mean for you?

 

Olga Cruz

So as he when everything is going right, usually there is, there is very little friction between the cofounders. The relationship between the founders and the investors or the syndicate as a whole. But in the. Area of entrepreneurship. That’s not always the case, and they’re going to be ups and downs. And then when things start becoming a bit more challenging, that’s when you realize the need of having people. That are truly aligned with your goals with your long term vision. So at that point, you really want people by your side that agree with your values and that actually care about you. So, you know, founders need to truly understand what the strategy of their investors, what are their expected. Patients. If, for example, they’re expecting an exit in a couple of years and they just want to prioritize short term. Gains or if they can be more flexible because of that commitment to that long term goal. Also I think that sometimes founders don’t realize that they might get pushed in a certain direction. They might have to compromise some things that. Really matter to them, that’s just because that’s what investors want. So from the beginning, knowing how you’re gonna build a cup table and who you’re going to bring in is definitely key for the success of any venture. And the same thing applies within the same. Great. So one of the things that I have certainly learned over my career has been that bringing other investors that are also aligned to participate in the early stages of the venture. Definitely the risks, the investment, and one way you’re a little bit more. Yeah, you know that you have other people that can contribute with with following investments, but at the same time to what Brian was saying, if you know that they’re going to support the founders in different ways, they’re going to also introduce them to other people in their network. Then you can definitely. Expect better returns and better performance when you are bringing other people into the table that can contribute and that have that same vision. So that’s that’s one thing and then you were asking how to make the founders a bit more visible. I think that that’s when accelerators such as altitude play a key role. I actually participate in over the summer over several workshops and. Yeah, several cohorts that are supporting entrepreneurs. So that’s a key way how we can get to learn a little bit more about them. Usually it’s even better when you get to meet them through a process in which you are just like supporting them with their strategy with their your teams for example, and you get to know and build that relationship, you get to know them. Better and yeah, definitely later when they start racing then you can even accelerate the process and you have already learned a lot about them. And yeah that’s that’s one of the key things that.

 

Hessie Jones

I want to turn to to Glenn on this one, because Olga, you talked about, you know, ways that they can. Be more visible to investors and maybe things that they need to learn or or need to improve on. For programs, let’s say for accelerators, there’s so many of them out there, and we’ve actually noticed that we even within the accelerators. Case there is, there is a softening in the market in terms of the number of companies that are that are actually applying there are there are accelerators that are saying that we we’re not seeing the number of startups coming in for help like we used to. Do you see this as something? Off the list this year, the number of of they start up boundaries that might become a little bit more insular in 2024.

 

Glenn Nishimura

I I think that’s likely to continue. Yes, I think this is going to be a a year of conservatism still despite the fact that everyone is hoping for a better and brighter back half of this year. I think a lot of my startup founder clients, they’re hunkering down, they’re playing it, they’re playing it safe right now, so. I think this is still a good time to still get in touch with accelerators then and and have them help you, but I think a lot of them are still kind of taking a cautious optimism sort of perspective on on this year, but. I’m encouraging startup founders to just reach out and talk to people for for this year and see how they can maintain that momentum and still stay agile without necessarily going gangbusters and then finding themselves in trouble again.

 

Hessie Jones

Right. OK. Thank you, Brian. So clean tech is, is is actually growing a lot I think probably because we have so many problems we need to solve and we have to solve them pretty fast, right? Otherwise Mother Nature’s going to have to get us. But what do you think is in store for this sector? In 2024, especially with the potential softening in the investment.

 

Bryan Duarte

I mean there there’s a couple of aspects of that. The the good news for the clean tech sector is that governments still continue to put money towards them, you know, here in here in Canada, we’ve got, we’ve got different things. Hopefully the whole SDTC debacle. That’s all sorted out soon, and because that was a great source of funding for clean tech sustainability. Companies. However, there’s other initiatives that are out there. There’s a lot of different initiatives in the US and a lot of different foundations. So when you start talking about what else is available going out for foundation. So what I advise clean tech companies is put a plan in place, put a plan in place of where you want to go. And look towards what you’re solving. And where there may be a match, one of the best companies that we have, they’ve already mapped out well five years into the future, OK, we know we need VC type funding to cover off our operational costs. But because of the space we’re involved in, it’s going to take massive project costs to meet them. So what foundations? Institutions can can back them, so start mapping out of a plan and go looking what grants may be available to see there. So that is an exercise onto itself. And again, going back to what you’re Glenn was saying. Bringing in and it’s not, you know, yes, be conservative of what you’re doing, but do not ignore accelerators. Look to see what accelerators could be aligned that can help you with that mission. And I would say a lot of accelerators, there’s a lot of similar content. So really look and spend some time digging in when you’re looking at the seller who the people are in there. That can help you with that and and connect you to whether these grants and so on. Another big untapped area for clean tech. Is corporate funding a lot of corporations are looking to either decarbonize what they’re doing or to beef up their environmental initiatives. And So what corporations may align with what you’re doing, and that may be the source of funding, may be a source of customers. The best problem to solve is a problem that somebody already has. I mean, we know in this industry you’re either solving for product. Market fit you’re solving for team or you’re solving for scale and I for me, when I look at companies in the clean tech space, I want to make sure the team is the right to. So that’s the same thing that Olga was talking about. We were talking about before. There’s the teams, the values aligned or they have the right mentality. Framework. Are they coachable? So great that one’s in place, so that’s a definite thing for any type of company, including clean tech. Companies making sure that and now when you look at product market fit, if they’re looking at corporations and seeing what are corporations problems, what are the things out there that we can solve or how does that align with something. And our solution they can be a great source of funding as well as a great source for customers. So then the only thing you should be solving. Or is how to scale up and how do we reach the sizes that are needed to make that big impact that they’re looking for in the clean tech space? So a huge opportunity. To me it’s the. It’s a great space to be in and so much is going to be changing and coming and will be changing rapidly because yeah, mother nature’s not going to sit back and say, oh, that’s OK, we won’t worry about forest fires this year or floods or, you know, massive environmental disruption. And we we’ve caused it and it’s going to come at a faster pace so. Getting to those solutions quicker is what we need, OK?

 

Hessie Jones

Thank you, Olga. What do you think like what do you are there other opportunities within the clean tech space for founders this year?

 

Olga Cruz

Fascinating space and definitely we’re hoping that will come back, but you can already see that there are many older foundations that have committed to use their capital for clean tech. And I would say that maybe something that is improving is that before we would see more capital for like serious. The investments and I think that that’s changing a little bit and now it’s a bit more available for early stage founders. So it’s it’s definitely a great time for founders to start building in this space. It’s urgent. It’s where also more capital is coming in. We’re also seeing the well 2024 is going to be the first year in which the Social Finance Fund that is backed by the Government of Canada will start reaching the entrepreneurs as the fund the fund managers have started deploying their capital. So definitely it’s a space that it’s picking up. I was reading this morning the CDC report of 2023 and one of the things that they mentioned. Was that the top performing companies were actually the companies that were in the fintech space and space related to sustainability. So yeah, it’s a it’s a good place to be investing in.

 

Hessie Jones

Thank you. So, Glenn, I’m just going to touch on something that you said in an article you said with cheap money and high valuations, came the boundless optimism that the good times would never end. So what are the implications of this and the lessons that like boundaries this year can take with them?

 

Glenn Nishimura

I think in some cases the the biggest implication and arguably the most dangerous is simply the development of hubris. You know when you have easy access to capital and all of your friends and your family. Are are, you know. Saying that your company is worth some insane and unrealistic valuation, it’s very easy to start believing that you’re invincible, and that can start creating some very serious blind spots. So in terms of lessons, what I’m encouraging my founder clients to do this year are three things on the people. Point #1 don’t just work on your PMF, as Brian was saying. Work on your PCF, your people and culture fit because this is going to be foundational. To your growth, absolutely. #2 take care of your existing team. You know, especially if you’ve laid people off recently, you will find that morale is extremely fragile right now. So you have to stabilize and control any bleeding before you completely hemorrhage out. And if you’ve never done a stay interview before in your life, now is a great time to start. And once things do start to improve and we’re starting to get a sense of that right now. Don’t stop. Don’t stop caring. Don’t stop investing in your people because ideally you should be checking on the pulse of your people and how your culture is doing as frequently and as intently as you would your financials. I would love to see it have that same degree of emphasis and. Focus and 3rd don’t stop recruiting. You know, you don’t necessarily have to hire right now, but you have to keep looking. You have to keep talking to people. It’s absolutely imperative that you keep that talent pipeline full at all times because the worst time to start looking for people is when the economy turns around and everyone is fishing from the same. Pond as you. Are you know that’s way too late? You have to get your hooks in early.

 

Hessie Jones

Thank you. That’s actually a good segue into the. The next question because Olga had this this interesting quote about it being more important than ever to bring our humanity to work. And so this is what you said. Like you said, whether you call it stakeholder capitalism, conscious capitalism. Or some variation. This approach simply flows from bringing our whole selves to work, and organizations make better decisions when they make full full that they make room. Sorry for the full scope of people’s values, concerns and capacities. Can you expand a little bit on that? I want each of you to to kind of. Respond to what this means to you. Olga first.

 

Olga Cruz

So we’re often thought that we need to park or he wanted to work to our humanity. The door to the business but. What we’re hoping we can see this year is more people, more investors, more founders, bringing that humanity to work. You know, we have seen that individuals, businesses, society is where way more resilient that we thrive when we can operate from that place. From that place of, just like being kind, thinking about the people that is around us, that is working with us and expanding our sense of belongingness. You know when you do that, that’s when you’re actually empowered. When you’re taking more responsibility and on one hand it brings fulfilling. Sense to life, but at the same time, if you want to see it just from like a very rational perspective, it actually improves long term value as you’re improving all of your environmental, social and governance aspects. So regardless if you have an impact focus or. Not you still want to have at least a minimum threshold of these practices, and they’re very easy ways. How you can check on how you’re doing. One tool that I highly recommend is ESV. We see. So it’s a very simple assessment to just like check on how are you doing what’s happening with your team. Are you actually prioritizing their well-being? How is the diversity of the team? What’s happening with the oversight of the company? So it’s? Definitely something that just can’t be. Forgotten. And it’s something that is definitely gonna help us in this year to thrive US society.

 

Hessie Jones

Thank you. That’s very well said, Bryan. What do you think?

 

Bryan Duarte

I mean, what all they said was great. I mean it it it’s so key and so important I tell people all the time solving the climate crisis is not really a technological challenge. I mean, we have technological things to develop, but it’s a people. Knowledge. It’s about culture changing behavior. So all that starts inside of a company. You know, if you’re bringing your humanity, as Ola said, if you’re bringing yourself to work and you’re looking, how do you feel about this? How do you feel about why you’re solving this problem that will come across in how you solve the problem? So it it’s a, it’s a very critical component for me. You know, we go back to talking about values. One of the values that’s important to me. Is it is love and people, it’s not love in the romantic sense. You know, if you have love for the people you work with, if you have love for your customers, if you have love for the planet, you’re gonna make better decisions than if you are just chasing a dollar. So and and again in to me where we’re looking at having this big impact. Have an impact on the climate. All that has to come into play. Otherwise, if it’s just about the dollar or if you’re in a company about the next fundraise and not where the company is going for the. Future or or. Or the that big mission that you started off with? You’re you’re bound to fail in the end. You you may get a payoff as an individual, but why? You set out to do it will not carry forward if you don’t pay attention to all those humanity aspects of it. I mean all the couldn’t. Have said it better.

 

Glenn Nishimura

Yeah. Kudos to to Olga as well. I think she captured this perfectly because I’m really happy we’re talking about this essay, because this really is the backbone of the kind of culture that I want every startup to have. You know this level of vulnerability, empathy, open communication. This is what attracts the brightest minds to join your company over another company, right? It has nothing to do with gobs of equity or getting company T-shirts or unlimited cans of Red Bull. You know, this is really what attracts the brightest minds and. At particularly in this type of environment and atmosphere, it’s also what keeps those brightest minds from jumping ship when the going gets tough, it’s what keeps them in the game. But that said, you know, creating an environment like this is not easy. It takes a lot of work, it takes a lot of focus. And I think a lot of startup founders. Just assume that it’s going to happen organically. It’s just going to happen by default. It’s going to happen overnight. I’ll just cross my fingers it. It can’t be. It doesn’t work that way. It has to be part of a deliberate plan that the entire company is committed to. And as I tell my startup founders, it has to be embedded in every practice and system that you have, particularly as it evolves around people. So stop hiring people based on experience and skills. Stop assuming that someone with 10 years of experience must be twice as fast, twice as smart, twice as skilled as someone with five years of experience. It doesn’t work that way. This is what we should be leading with. This is the kind of foot that we should be leading all of our hiring and interview questions and then everything else is just a nice add-on because if you don’t have this, you don’t have.

 

Hessie Jones

Thank you that that was amazing from all of you. I feel like we’ve covered so much. I’m going to ask one last question, but I I don’t know if there’s any more add to this. I’m going to ask it anyway. So from all your perspective, what should startups do this year differently? Given the economic outlook, and if you do have advice to to aspiring new founders, what would that be? So I’ll start with Olga.

 

Olga Cruz

So Brian was saying earlier that you feel the startups are solving for the same issues. So when we go through the lists of the the hundreds of companies that we have evaluated in the previous years and we see the reasons why we have passed, usually it comes to the same. One scale, so there are many. There are many advantages of building companies in Canada, but also even if you just think about the size of the population, that also results in sometimes limitations. To scale so one of the things that we usually encourage founders to do is to think beyond the Canadian borders and think when it’s possible. To, you know, like venture into the US to think about North America as a whole and to like from the very beginning, think how can they be, how can they build defensibility? Let’s one then the second one would be usually product market fit and I mean one, we know that resources might be limiting right now, but that’s when you have to be very resourceful about how you’re going to prove that traction. How you’re going to demonstrate that there is an appetite for your product, for your service and some of these things that I usually recommend is building wait lists, creating distribution agreements. Even like just making sure that you’re speaking to your customers, that you’re like Co developing the products and services with them, that’s already something that demonstrates that you are on the right way. So that’s something else. And then finally, back to your question. But what would we recommend to aspiring entrepreneurs? I would say that again. You know, like there has never been a better time to build a company that. That is mission driven. I would say that overall when it’s it’s urgent, we know that summer will come soon and we don’t want to see this forest fires. There are many challenges that we have right now. So there are many problems to solve. There but also. There is an increasing appetite from investors and yeah, we we definitely want to see the ecosystem growing and we have many advisors around willing to support these entrepreneurs. So certainly I would say take 2024 as a call to action and start building also from your heart on what are the things that can improve people’s lives that can truly improve environment.

 

Hessie Jones

Thank you and Bryan.

 

Bryan Duarte

Yes, there’s a a couple of things that I say startups should do in 2024. To me, one of them is diversify your team. You know, we we’re supporting underrepresented founders in the climate, tech, clean tech space and it’s not. Just because those are the ones that have been passed over haven’t got the investment, but we also see they tend to be more resilient if you’re not founder from anyone under underrepresented groups, you usually have to do more with less. So going into 2024, you know, or coming even going through 2023, those founders are the ones that I saw. You helped to stretch out the capital that was given for that. I think Glenn had said, you know, it’s not about going and looking what’s the next big capital raise, right? It’s how can you work with what you’ve had, make that stretch longer. So if you know, if you’re a small team, OK, maybe going and getting another team member is not necessarily the easiest, but you can diversify by looking at who do you reach out to as advisors. Who do you bring in and in the team that way? Because if they all either went to the same schools that you did or or or look like you did, they aren’t going to have one sort of perspective. So the more you can diversify your perspective and diversify your. Thought to me that that is one thing you should be looking at going into 2024. The other thing for aspiring founders is I love what Olga said leading from your heart and leading to solve a big problem that you’re passionate about or or passionate future, but also go and talk to customers. About it, before you build anything, I still remember one of the entrepreneurs I was mentoring her before. She had this great idea and what she wanted to do, but I just kept encouraging go out, talk to people, go talk to the potential customers for this product and relies as much as what she thought thought she was solving. It’s great there wasn’t a demand for it out there, so she pivoted and changed into something where there’s the demand. So even before you build anything as an aspiring founder, make sure you first talk to customers or potential customers and it’s easier than you think and see are people really willing to get this by it, you know, and it’s a. And it’s a bit of a challenge when you’re looking to disrupt something or disrupt an industry, but getting that good understanding before you go out and put a lot of time and effort into building something is key. And again, you know, speaking to, you know, accelerators like altitude can be really great and helping you get that.

 

Hessie Jones

Thank you. I like what you said thought about the the diversity angle because as you know, I’m sure you all know that there is a war on DEI right now, especially in big tech because. From their perspective, it’s the thing that’s slowing down progress and if they have to get, you know, representation and different perspectives. People, the people that normally make the decisions, it just frustrates them to to all hell. So let’s keep pushing for diversity in not in teams and as well as perspectives. OK. Finally, Glenn, what do? You think?

 

Glenn Nishimura

Agree totally. What everybody is saying. Thank you very much like groupthink is, is very dangerous, particularly for a growing startup. Yeah. First of all, I think when the economy and and all of its associated parts starts to improve, I would tell start up founders to not. Step on the gas and start hiring like crazy to make up for lost time. I believe it’s a misnomer that growth and success and the size of your team have a proportional relationship. They don’t. Small teams can accomplish some very big things and yet we are conditioned. Many startup founders are conditioned to think the larger the better. As you all know, a lot of startups bulked up over the last few years. They thought that they could execute better and execute faster if they had more people. But a lot of them were in for a nasty surprise when they realized that it was exactly the opposite. That these larger teams actually added friction, they actually added complexity, and the Founders realized that they didn’t have the leadership skills or the structure or the systems or the people and communication strategies that are necessary to underpin all of that growth. So and my last piece of advice for startup founders, regardless of whether it’s one person or two people or even an independent contract. Doctor, if you find yourself in the unenviable position of having to lay people off this year, and as we’ve been saying throughout this show for the you know, we’re two months in and we’re still seeing it continue. I would only ask that you please do it compassionately. I can. I can tell you horror stories of of some very impersonal and cold ways that people were laid off last year. And that’s not the way we should be doing it. That’s not the way we should be developing our our company brands and it’s not the way that we should be doing things as as human beings. So if you do have to lay people off, please do it respectfully. Please do it compassionately and also don’t just consider you know how much somebody earns or what their job performance is like or what their job title is when you’re deciding who to let go. Right. Think very carefully about each individual’s future potential. Think about who lives your vision and your values, and who actually contributes to the type of culture that you ultimately want to build. Because when all of this negativity and all of this economic downside begins to improve and we’re starting to see signs of that already. You need to have the very best people. Standing with you in order to rebuild.

 

Hessie Jones

Thank you. That on on that beautiful closing note. Thank you, Glenn. That’s all we have time for today. So I thank Brian, Glenn and Olga for joining us. If you want more details on on this topic, we actually wrote a beautiful article about is 2024. The Year of Investor Restraint. And startup resilience. It’s on our website, altitudeaccelerator.ca. I invite you to check it out. Also in in our audience. If you have any topics that you want us to cover, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us by e-mail communications@altitudeaccelerator.ca. Thank you again for joining us. And in the meantime, have fun. And stay safe.

Host Information
Hessie Jones

Hessie Jones is an Author, Strategist, Investor and Data Privacy Practitioner, advocating for human-centred AI, education and the ethical distribution of AI in this era of transformation. 

She currently serves as the Innovations Manager at Altitude Accelerator. She provides the necessary support for Altitude Accelerator’s programs including Incubator and Investor Readiness. She will be the liaison among key stakeholders to provide operational support and ultimately drive founder success. 

LinkedIn

You can also listen to this podcast on Spotify.

Please subscribe to our weekly LinkedIn Live newsletters.

The post Is 2024 the Year of Investor Restraint and Startup Resilience? appeared first on Altitude Accelerator.

]]>